Skip to main content

JVM Monitoring Challenges: What to Watch Out for in 2025

Sujitha Paduchuri
ManageEngine

JVM monitoring is crucial for java-based environments, to gain visibility into the performance and operations of VMs. It helps them understand the behavior of KPIs like memory and CPU utilization, threads, and garbage collection. These insights help administrators identify performance anomalies, locate erroneous corners in JVM environments, and fix ailments that cause issues like application downtime, unavailable services, data request saturation, and slow servers.

But JVM monitoring is not as simple and straightforward as it seems. Without an efficient JVM monitoring strategy and a dedicated tool, admins are left with numerous interdependent metrics to track and large chunks of historical data to analyze. In this article, we talk about common challenges encountered by ITOps and DevOps teams while monitoring JVM ecosystems and how to tackle them with an efficient JVM performance monitoring solution.

Top 5 Challenges in JVM Monitoring

1. Blind-spots in garbage collection

Garbage collection is crucial for seamless JVM operations. While traditional JVM monitoring tech can track GC activity, teams fail at correlating GC pauses and anomalies with the rest of the JVM performance metrics. Delays in Garbage Collection are only discovered when there is a spike in latency or response time, after it is too late to prevent the effect on end user experience. This affects the overall efficiency of the servers and potentially impacts the performance of applications based on the servers.

2. Hidden memory leaks

Due to the low-level memory management among JVMs, memory leaks are not easy to detect at times. There is a risk of heap memory accumulating unused objects and over-consuming memory than that is allocated by the admin. This makes locating leaks challenging, and fixing the memory leak before it affects overall server performance becomes close to impossible.

3. Thread contention and deadlocks

Thread contention, starvation, and deadlocks can slow your java application down. Troubleshooting these issues usually involves monitoring and analyzing thread dumps in real-time, which is tedious and close to impossible with short-lived JVMS instances. Such critical observations are not scalable for applications that operate for a diverse user base, especially during production incidents. In these cases, minor overlooks can escalate to severe application downtime.

4. Overwhelming metrics and labels

Java applications come with numerous key performance indicators that generate large chunks of performance data across user sessions, transactions, and services. These metrics are dynamic and come with unique behavior that depends on the size of the user base and the enterprise. Such volumes of data can overload monitoring tools, affecting aggregation and precision in performance analysis and anomaly prediction. This can blind your visibility into the performance of your applications and services.

5. Excessive alert noise

JVM KPIs fluctuate depending on load, peak hours, and background tasks. Traditional thresholds can’t keep up with their dynamic behavior. This causes alert noise; an avalanche of unimportant alarms that overshadow critical issues that might need immediate attention. Alert noise and false alarms lead to inefficient issue resolution and overlooked incidents that affect overall performance and user experience severely.

Overcoming JVM Monitoring Challenges

"Overcoming JVM monitoring challenges" might sound like a herculean task, but with the right strategies and monitoring solutions, you can master it like a pro. Here are the key techniques that can strengthen your JVM monitoring approach:

  • Real-time KPI tracking: Track KPIs like thread pools, garbage collection activity, memory, latency, and throughput in real time to understand JVM performance.
  • JMX metric support: Use JMX (Java Management Extensions) to gain deeper insights into Java-based services like Tomcat or JBoss. Monitor connection pools, thread usage, and service-specific behaviors as you go.
  • Historical performance data: Leverage historical analysis to detect recurring patterns, slow-building issues, and root causes that hide behind real-time snapshots.
  • Smart alerting systems: Assign severity-based alerts and streamline communication across Slack, email, or SMS. Trigger responsive actions and automate escalation to ensure quicker fixes.
  • Adaptive thresholds: Configure adaptive thresholds that scale-up with dynamic application loads to reduce false alarms and enhance alert reliability.
  • Scalability: Make sure your monitoring solution grows with your infrastructure; whether it is a small production environment or an enterprise-wide deployment.
  • Unified platform: Adopt a centralized console that draws JVM, application, infrastructure, and user experience metrics under one roof. This helps in enhancing correlation and dependency mapping; speeding up root cause analysis and thereby issue resolution.

ManageEngine Applications Manager is one of the widely recommended monitoring solutions in the market. It brings together all the above capabilities into one console. It offers in-depth visibility into JVM environments and Java applications while also supporting over 150 technologies including databases, servers, cloud services, containers, middleware, and more. Whether you’re optimizing garbage collection or investigating thread deadlocks, Applications Manager helps you do it all from a unified, scalable platform. Try the 30-day free trial or schedule a demo to explore its capabilities.

Sujitha Paduchuri is a Content Writer at ManageEngine, a division of Zohocorp

Hot Topics

The Latest

AI observability serves several roles across an organization. AI engineers use it to build, evaluate, and improve AI systems. SREs use it to operate those systems reliably and efficiently in production, including managing their cost. Leaders need it to connect AI behavior and operational performance to business outcomes. The common need is a clear understanding of whether AI systems are delivering the intended result ...

Part 4 outlines the challenges enterprise face when adopting AI observability. The main challenge is that AI complexity compounds at every stage of maturity. LLM-based applications introduce new behavior, dependencies, and quality considerations, while Agentic AI adds further failure modes as systems make decisions and take actions ...

Part 3 reports on the current state of AI observability. Most experts agree: enterprises are moving faster with AI than they are with the operational discipline needed to run it safely ...

When discussing AI Observability, one of the first questions that arises: Is this just an extension of traditional observability or is this a whole new type of tool? Part 2 compares traditional observability with AI observability ...

In this extensive 14-part series that will post over the next three weeks, experts across observability and AI will provide insight and opinions on the need for AI Observability, the challenges, the benefits, the current state, and predictions for the future ...

Amid rising complexity, organizations are moving quickly toward agent-driven operations: AgenticOps, according to The Impact of Agentic AI on Network Operations, a new report from Cisco ...

AI, automation, and enterprise software give organizations an extraordinary amount of leverage. Work that once required hours can happen in minutes. Information buried across systems can be analyzed almost instantly. Complex workflows can be coordinated across teams with far less manual intervention. That leverage creates a temptation to start with the technology ...

Everyone wants to talk about models. Compute clusters. Benchmark scores that climb a fraction of a point and make headlines anyway. It's an easy conversation to have because it's measurable. But it's also increasingly beside the point ...

For more than a decade, the default infrastructure play has been simple. Move more workloads to the cloud, retire on-premises gear and treat the data center as a cost to shrink. That logic held while public cloud offered near-limitless capacity at predictable prices, and AI demand is now testing both halves of that assumption ...

Most enterprise IT leaders can tell you exactly how many applications are running across their organization. They can surface a dashboard showing telecom spend by region, pull a report on SaaS license utilization, or call up a real-time view of mobile device inventory. The data is there, and IT leaders have largely delivered on the promise of visibility. Yet, in most organizations, that visibility has not translated into business value ...

JVM Monitoring Challenges: What to Watch Out for in 2025

Sujitha Paduchuri
ManageEngine

JVM monitoring is crucial for java-based environments, to gain visibility into the performance and operations of VMs. It helps them understand the behavior of KPIs like memory and CPU utilization, threads, and garbage collection. These insights help administrators identify performance anomalies, locate erroneous corners in JVM environments, and fix ailments that cause issues like application downtime, unavailable services, data request saturation, and slow servers.

But JVM monitoring is not as simple and straightforward as it seems. Without an efficient JVM monitoring strategy and a dedicated tool, admins are left with numerous interdependent metrics to track and large chunks of historical data to analyze. In this article, we talk about common challenges encountered by ITOps and DevOps teams while monitoring JVM ecosystems and how to tackle them with an efficient JVM performance monitoring solution.

Top 5 Challenges in JVM Monitoring

1. Blind-spots in garbage collection

Garbage collection is crucial for seamless JVM operations. While traditional JVM monitoring tech can track GC activity, teams fail at correlating GC pauses and anomalies with the rest of the JVM performance metrics. Delays in Garbage Collection are only discovered when there is a spike in latency or response time, after it is too late to prevent the effect on end user experience. This affects the overall efficiency of the servers and potentially impacts the performance of applications based on the servers.

2. Hidden memory leaks

Due to the low-level memory management among JVMs, memory leaks are not easy to detect at times. There is a risk of heap memory accumulating unused objects and over-consuming memory than that is allocated by the admin. This makes locating leaks challenging, and fixing the memory leak before it affects overall server performance becomes close to impossible.

3. Thread contention and deadlocks

Thread contention, starvation, and deadlocks can slow your java application down. Troubleshooting these issues usually involves monitoring and analyzing thread dumps in real-time, which is tedious and close to impossible with short-lived JVMS instances. Such critical observations are not scalable for applications that operate for a diverse user base, especially during production incidents. In these cases, minor overlooks can escalate to severe application downtime.

4. Overwhelming metrics and labels

Java applications come with numerous key performance indicators that generate large chunks of performance data across user sessions, transactions, and services. These metrics are dynamic and come with unique behavior that depends on the size of the user base and the enterprise. Such volumes of data can overload monitoring tools, affecting aggregation and precision in performance analysis and anomaly prediction. This can blind your visibility into the performance of your applications and services.

5. Excessive alert noise

JVM KPIs fluctuate depending on load, peak hours, and background tasks. Traditional thresholds can’t keep up with their dynamic behavior. This causes alert noise; an avalanche of unimportant alarms that overshadow critical issues that might need immediate attention. Alert noise and false alarms lead to inefficient issue resolution and overlooked incidents that affect overall performance and user experience severely.

Overcoming JVM Monitoring Challenges

"Overcoming JVM monitoring challenges" might sound like a herculean task, but with the right strategies and monitoring solutions, you can master it like a pro. Here are the key techniques that can strengthen your JVM monitoring approach:

  • Real-time KPI tracking: Track KPIs like thread pools, garbage collection activity, memory, latency, and throughput in real time to understand JVM performance.
  • JMX metric support: Use JMX (Java Management Extensions) to gain deeper insights into Java-based services like Tomcat or JBoss. Monitor connection pools, thread usage, and service-specific behaviors as you go.
  • Historical performance data: Leverage historical analysis to detect recurring patterns, slow-building issues, and root causes that hide behind real-time snapshots.
  • Smart alerting systems: Assign severity-based alerts and streamline communication across Slack, email, or SMS. Trigger responsive actions and automate escalation to ensure quicker fixes.
  • Adaptive thresholds: Configure adaptive thresholds that scale-up with dynamic application loads to reduce false alarms and enhance alert reliability.
  • Scalability: Make sure your monitoring solution grows with your infrastructure; whether it is a small production environment or an enterprise-wide deployment.
  • Unified platform: Adopt a centralized console that draws JVM, application, infrastructure, and user experience metrics under one roof. This helps in enhancing correlation and dependency mapping; speeding up root cause analysis and thereby issue resolution.

ManageEngine Applications Manager is one of the widely recommended monitoring solutions in the market. It brings together all the above capabilities into one console. It offers in-depth visibility into JVM environments and Java applications while also supporting over 150 technologies including databases, servers, cloud services, containers, middleware, and more. Whether you’re optimizing garbage collection or investigating thread deadlocks, Applications Manager helps you do it all from a unified, scalable platform. Try the 30-day free trial or schedule a demo to explore its capabilities.

Sujitha Paduchuri is a Content Writer at ManageEngine, a division of Zohocorp

Hot Topics

The Latest

AI observability serves several roles across an organization. AI engineers use it to build, evaluate, and improve AI systems. SREs use it to operate those systems reliably and efficiently in production, including managing their cost. Leaders need it to connect AI behavior and operational performance to business outcomes. The common need is a clear understanding of whether AI systems are delivering the intended result ...

Part 4 outlines the challenges enterprise face when adopting AI observability. The main challenge is that AI complexity compounds at every stage of maturity. LLM-based applications introduce new behavior, dependencies, and quality considerations, while Agentic AI adds further failure modes as systems make decisions and take actions ...

Part 3 reports on the current state of AI observability. Most experts agree: enterprises are moving faster with AI than they are with the operational discipline needed to run it safely ...

When discussing AI Observability, one of the first questions that arises: Is this just an extension of traditional observability or is this a whole new type of tool? Part 2 compares traditional observability with AI observability ...

In this extensive 14-part series that will post over the next three weeks, experts across observability and AI will provide insight and opinions on the need for AI Observability, the challenges, the benefits, the current state, and predictions for the future ...

Amid rising complexity, organizations are moving quickly toward agent-driven operations: AgenticOps, according to The Impact of Agentic AI on Network Operations, a new report from Cisco ...

AI, automation, and enterprise software give organizations an extraordinary amount of leverage. Work that once required hours can happen in minutes. Information buried across systems can be analyzed almost instantly. Complex workflows can be coordinated across teams with far less manual intervention. That leverage creates a temptation to start with the technology ...

Everyone wants to talk about models. Compute clusters. Benchmark scores that climb a fraction of a point and make headlines anyway. It's an easy conversation to have because it's measurable. But it's also increasingly beside the point ...

For more than a decade, the default infrastructure play has been simple. Move more workloads to the cloud, retire on-premises gear and treat the data center as a cost to shrink. That logic held while public cloud offered near-limitless capacity at predictable prices, and AI demand is now testing both halves of that assumption ...

Most enterprise IT leaders can tell you exactly how many applications are running across their organization. They can surface a dashboard showing telecom spend by region, pull a report on SaaS license utilization, or call up a real-time view of mobile device inventory. The data is there, and IT leaders have largely delivered on the promise of visibility. Yet, in most organizations, that visibility has not translated into business value ...