Skip to main content

JVM Monitoring Challenges: What to Watch Out for in 2025

Sujitha Paduchuri
ManageEngine

JVM monitoring is crucial for java-based environments, to gain visibility into the performance and operations of VMs. It helps them understand the behavior of KPIs like memory and CPU utilization, threads, and garbage collection. These insights help administrators identify performance anomalies, locate erroneous corners in JVM environments, and fix ailments that cause issues like application downtime, unavailable services, data request saturation, and slow servers.

But JVM monitoring is not as simple and straightforward as it seems. Without an efficient JVM monitoring strategy and a dedicated tool, admins are left with numerous interdependent metrics to track and large chunks of historical data to analyze. In this article, we talk about common challenges encountered by ITOps and DevOps teams while monitoring JVM ecosystems and how to tackle them with an efficient JVM performance monitoring solution.

Top 5 Challenges in JVM Monitoring

1. Blind-spots in garbage collection

Garbage collection is crucial for seamless JVM operations. While traditional JVM monitoring tech can track GC activity, teams fail at correlating GC pauses and anomalies with the rest of the JVM performance metrics. Delays in Garbage Collection are only discovered when there is a spike in latency or response time, after it is too late to prevent the effect on end user experience. This affects the overall efficiency of the servers and potentially impacts the performance of applications based on the servers.

2. Hidden memory leaks

Due to the low-level memory management among JVMs, memory leaks are not easy to detect at times. There is a risk of heap memory accumulating unused objects and over-consuming memory than that is allocated by the admin. This makes locating leaks challenging, and fixing the memory leak before it affects overall server performance becomes close to impossible.

3. Thread contention and deadlocks

Thread contention, starvation, and deadlocks can slow your java application down. Troubleshooting these issues usually involves monitoring and analyzing thread dumps in real-time, which is tedious and close to impossible with short-lived JVMS instances. Such critical observations are not scalable for applications that operate for a diverse user base, especially during production incidents. In these cases, minor overlooks can escalate to severe application downtime.

4. Overwhelming metrics and labels

Java applications come with numerous key performance indicators that generate large chunks of performance data across user sessions, transactions, and services. These metrics are dynamic and come with unique behavior that depends on the size of the user base and the enterprise. Such volumes of data can overload monitoring tools, affecting aggregation and precision in performance analysis and anomaly prediction. This can blind your visibility into the performance of your applications and services.

5. Excessive alert noise

JVM KPIs fluctuate depending on load, peak hours, and background tasks. Traditional thresholds can’t keep up with their dynamic behavior. This causes alert noise; an avalanche of unimportant alarms that overshadow critical issues that might need immediate attention. Alert noise and false alarms lead to inefficient issue resolution and overlooked incidents that affect overall performance and user experience severely.

Overcoming JVM Monitoring Challenges

"Overcoming JVM monitoring challenges" might sound like a herculean task, but with the right strategies and monitoring solutions, you can master it like a pro. Here are the key techniques that can strengthen your JVM monitoring approach:

  • Real-time KPI tracking: Track KPIs like thread pools, garbage collection activity, memory, latency, and throughput in real time to understand JVM performance.
  • JMX metric support: Use JMX (Java Management Extensions) to gain deeper insights into Java-based services like Tomcat or JBoss. Monitor connection pools, thread usage, and service-specific behaviors as you go.
  • Historical performance data: Leverage historical analysis to detect recurring patterns, slow-building issues, and root causes that hide behind real-time snapshots.
  • Smart alerting systems: Assign severity-based alerts and streamline communication across Slack, email, or SMS. Trigger responsive actions and automate escalation to ensure quicker fixes.
  • Adaptive thresholds: Configure adaptive thresholds that scale-up with dynamic application loads to reduce false alarms and enhance alert reliability.
  • Scalability: Make sure your monitoring solution grows with your infrastructure; whether it is a small production environment or an enterprise-wide deployment.
  • Unified platform: Adopt a centralized console that draws JVM, application, infrastructure, and user experience metrics under one roof. This helps in enhancing correlation and dependency mapping; speeding up root cause analysis and thereby issue resolution.

ManageEngine Applications Manager is one of the widely recommended monitoring solutions in the market. It brings together all the above capabilities into one console. It offers in-depth visibility into JVM environments and Java applications while also supporting over 150 technologies including databases, servers, cloud services, containers, middleware, and more. Whether you’re optimizing garbage collection or investigating thread deadlocks, Applications Manager helps you do it all from a unified, scalable platform. Try the 30-day free trial or schedule a demo to explore its capabilities.

Sujitha Paduchuri is a Content Writer at ManageEngine, a division of Zohocorp

Hot Topics

The Latest

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

JVM Monitoring Challenges: What to Watch Out for in 2025

Sujitha Paduchuri
ManageEngine

JVM monitoring is crucial for java-based environments, to gain visibility into the performance and operations of VMs. It helps them understand the behavior of KPIs like memory and CPU utilization, threads, and garbage collection. These insights help administrators identify performance anomalies, locate erroneous corners in JVM environments, and fix ailments that cause issues like application downtime, unavailable services, data request saturation, and slow servers.

But JVM monitoring is not as simple and straightforward as it seems. Without an efficient JVM monitoring strategy and a dedicated tool, admins are left with numerous interdependent metrics to track and large chunks of historical data to analyze. In this article, we talk about common challenges encountered by ITOps and DevOps teams while monitoring JVM ecosystems and how to tackle them with an efficient JVM performance monitoring solution.

Top 5 Challenges in JVM Monitoring

1. Blind-spots in garbage collection

Garbage collection is crucial for seamless JVM operations. While traditional JVM monitoring tech can track GC activity, teams fail at correlating GC pauses and anomalies with the rest of the JVM performance metrics. Delays in Garbage Collection are only discovered when there is a spike in latency or response time, after it is too late to prevent the effect on end user experience. This affects the overall efficiency of the servers and potentially impacts the performance of applications based on the servers.

2. Hidden memory leaks

Due to the low-level memory management among JVMs, memory leaks are not easy to detect at times. There is a risk of heap memory accumulating unused objects and over-consuming memory than that is allocated by the admin. This makes locating leaks challenging, and fixing the memory leak before it affects overall server performance becomes close to impossible.

3. Thread contention and deadlocks

Thread contention, starvation, and deadlocks can slow your java application down. Troubleshooting these issues usually involves monitoring and analyzing thread dumps in real-time, which is tedious and close to impossible with short-lived JVMS instances. Such critical observations are not scalable for applications that operate for a diverse user base, especially during production incidents. In these cases, minor overlooks can escalate to severe application downtime.

4. Overwhelming metrics and labels

Java applications come with numerous key performance indicators that generate large chunks of performance data across user sessions, transactions, and services. These metrics are dynamic and come with unique behavior that depends on the size of the user base and the enterprise. Such volumes of data can overload monitoring tools, affecting aggregation and precision in performance analysis and anomaly prediction. This can blind your visibility into the performance of your applications and services.

5. Excessive alert noise

JVM KPIs fluctuate depending on load, peak hours, and background tasks. Traditional thresholds can’t keep up with their dynamic behavior. This causes alert noise; an avalanche of unimportant alarms that overshadow critical issues that might need immediate attention. Alert noise and false alarms lead to inefficient issue resolution and overlooked incidents that affect overall performance and user experience severely.

Overcoming JVM Monitoring Challenges

"Overcoming JVM monitoring challenges" might sound like a herculean task, but with the right strategies and monitoring solutions, you can master it like a pro. Here are the key techniques that can strengthen your JVM monitoring approach:

  • Real-time KPI tracking: Track KPIs like thread pools, garbage collection activity, memory, latency, and throughput in real time to understand JVM performance.
  • JMX metric support: Use JMX (Java Management Extensions) to gain deeper insights into Java-based services like Tomcat or JBoss. Monitor connection pools, thread usage, and service-specific behaviors as you go.
  • Historical performance data: Leverage historical analysis to detect recurring patterns, slow-building issues, and root causes that hide behind real-time snapshots.
  • Smart alerting systems: Assign severity-based alerts and streamline communication across Slack, email, or SMS. Trigger responsive actions and automate escalation to ensure quicker fixes.
  • Adaptive thresholds: Configure adaptive thresholds that scale-up with dynamic application loads to reduce false alarms and enhance alert reliability.
  • Scalability: Make sure your monitoring solution grows with your infrastructure; whether it is a small production environment or an enterprise-wide deployment.
  • Unified platform: Adopt a centralized console that draws JVM, application, infrastructure, and user experience metrics under one roof. This helps in enhancing correlation and dependency mapping; speeding up root cause analysis and thereby issue resolution.

ManageEngine Applications Manager is one of the widely recommended monitoring solutions in the market. It brings together all the above capabilities into one console. It offers in-depth visibility into JVM environments and Java applications while also supporting over 150 technologies including databases, servers, cloud services, containers, middleware, and more. Whether you’re optimizing garbage collection or investigating thread deadlocks, Applications Manager helps you do it all from a unified, scalable platform. Try the 30-day free trial or schedule a demo to explore its capabilities.

Sujitha Paduchuri is a Content Writer at ManageEngine, a division of Zohocorp

Hot Topics

The Latest

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...