Skip to main content

JVM Monitoring Challenges: What to Watch Out for in 2025

Sujitha Paduchuri
ManageEngine

JVM monitoring is crucial for java-based environments, to gain visibility into the performance and operations of VMs. It helps them understand the behavior of KPIs like memory and CPU utilization, threads, and garbage collection. These insights help administrators identify performance anomalies, locate erroneous corners in JVM environments, and fix ailments that cause issues like application downtime, unavailable services, data request saturation, and slow servers.

But JVM monitoring is not as simple and straightforward as it seems. Without an efficient JVM monitoring strategy and a dedicated tool, admins are left with numerous interdependent metrics to track and large chunks of historical data to analyze. In this article, we talk about common challenges encountered by ITOps and DevOps teams while monitoring JVM ecosystems and how to tackle them with an efficient JVM performance monitoring solution.

Top 5 Challenges in JVM Monitoring

1. Blind-spots in garbage collection

Garbage collection is crucial for seamless JVM operations. While traditional JVM monitoring tech can track GC activity, teams fail at correlating GC pauses and anomalies with the rest of the JVM performance metrics. Delays in Garbage Collection are only discovered when there is a spike in latency or response time, after it is too late to prevent the effect on end user experience. This affects the overall efficiency of the servers and potentially impacts the performance of applications based on the servers.

2. Hidden memory leaks

Due to the low-level memory management among JVMs, memory leaks are not easy to detect at times. There is a risk of heap memory accumulating unused objects and over-consuming memory than that is allocated by the admin. This makes locating leaks challenging, and fixing the memory leak before it affects overall server performance becomes close to impossible.

3. Thread contention and deadlocks

Thread contention, starvation, and deadlocks can slow your java application down. Troubleshooting these issues usually involves monitoring and analyzing thread dumps in real-time, which is tedious and close to impossible with short-lived JVMS instances. Such critical observations are not scalable for applications that operate for a diverse user base, especially during production incidents. In these cases, minor overlooks can escalate to severe application downtime.

4. Overwhelming metrics and labels

Java applications come with numerous key performance indicators that generate large chunks of performance data across user sessions, transactions, and services. These metrics are dynamic and come with unique behavior that depends on the size of the user base and the enterprise. Such volumes of data can overload monitoring tools, affecting aggregation and precision in performance analysis and anomaly prediction. This can blind your visibility into the performance of your applications and services.

5. Excessive alert noise

JVM KPIs fluctuate depending on load, peak hours, and background tasks. Traditional thresholds can’t keep up with their dynamic behavior. This causes alert noise; an avalanche of unimportant alarms that overshadow critical issues that might need immediate attention. Alert noise and false alarms lead to inefficient issue resolution and overlooked incidents that affect overall performance and user experience severely.

Overcoming JVM Monitoring Challenges

"Overcoming JVM monitoring challenges" might sound like a herculean task, but with the right strategies and monitoring solutions, you can master it like a pro. Here are the key techniques that can strengthen your JVM monitoring approach:

  • Real-time KPI tracking: Track KPIs like thread pools, garbage collection activity, memory, latency, and throughput in real time to understand JVM performance.
  • JMX metric support: Use JMX (Java Management Extensions) to gain deeper insights into Java-based services like Tomcat or JBoss. Monitor connection pools, thread usage, and service-specific behaviors as you go.
  • Historical performance data: Leverage historical analysis to detect recurring patterns, slow-building issues, and root causes that hide behind real-time snapshots.
  • Smart alerting systems: Assign severity-based alerts and streamline communication across Slack, email, or SMS. Trigger responsive actions and automate escalation to ensure quicker fixes.
  • Adaptive thresholds: Configure adaptive thresholds that scale-up with dynamic application loads to reduce false alarms and enhance alert reliability.
  • Scalability: Make sure your monitoring solution grows with your infrastructure; whether it is a small production environment or an enterprise-wide deployment.
  • Unified platform: Adopt a centralized console that draws JVM, application, infrastructure, and user experience metrics under one roof. This helps in enhancing correlation and dependency mapping; speeding up root cause analysis and thereby issue resolution.

ManageEngine Applications Manager is one of the widely recommended monitoring solutions in the market. It brings together all the above capabilities into one console. It offers in-depth visibility into JVM environments and Java applications while also supporting over 150 technologies including databases, servers, cloud services, containers, middleware, and more. Whether you’re optimizing garbage collection or investigating thread deadlocks, Applications Manager helps you do it all from a unified, scalable platform. Try the 30-day free trial or schedule a demo to explore its capabilities.

Sujitha Paduchuri is a Content Writer at ManageEngine, a division of Zohocorp

Hot Topics

The Latest

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

40% of organizations deploying AI will implement dedicated AI observability tools by 2028 to monitor model performance, bias and outputs, according to Gartner ...

Until AI-powered engineering tools have live visibility of how code behaves at runtime, they cannot be trusted to autonomously ensure reliable systems, according to the State of AI-Powered Engineering Report 2026 report from Lightrun. The report reveals that a major volume of manual work is required when AI-generated code is deployed: 43% of AI-generated code requires manual debugging in production, even after passing QA or staging tests. Furthermore, an average of three manual redeploy cycles are required to verify a single AI-suggested code fix in production ...

Many organizations describe AI as strategic, but they do not manage it strategically. When AI plans are disconnected from strategy, detached from organizational learning, and protected from serious assumptions testing, the problem is no longer technical immaturity; it is a failure of management discipline ... Executives too often tell organizations to "use AI" before they define what AI is supposed to change. The problem deepens in organizations where strategy isn't well articulated in the first place ...

Across the enterprise technology landscape, a quiet crisis is playing out. Organizations have run hundreds, sometimes thousands, of generative AI pilots. Leadership has celebrated the proof of concept (POCs) ... Industry experience points to a sobering reality: only 5-10% of AI POCs that progress to the pilot stage successfully reach scaled production. The remaining 90% fail because the enterprise environment around them was never ready to absorb them, not the AI models ...

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...

JVM Monitoring Challenges: What to Watch Out for in 2025

Sujitha Paduchuri
ManageEngine

JVM monitoring is crucial for java-based environments, to gain visibility into the performance and operations of VMs. It helps them understand the behavior of KPIs like memory and CPU utilization, threads, and garbage collection. These insights help administrators identify performance anomalies, locate erroneous corners in JVM environments, and fix ailments that cause issues like application downtime, unavailable services, data request saturation, and slow servers.

But JVM monitoring is not as simple and straightforward as it seems. Without an efficient JVM monitoring strategy and a dedicated tool, admins are left with numerous interdependent metrics to track and large chunks of historical data to analyze. In this article, we talk about common challenges encountered by ITOps and DevOps teams while monitoring JVM ecosystems and how to tackle them with an efficient JVM performance monitoring solution.

Top 5 Challenges in JVM Monitoring

1. Blind-spots in garbage collection

Garbage collection is crucial for seamless JVM operations. While traditional JVM monitoring tech can track GC activity, teams fail at correlating GC pauses and anomalies with the rest of the JVM performance metrics. Delays in Garbage Collection are only discovered when there is a spike in latency or response time, after it is too late to prevent the effect on end user experience. This affects the overall efficiency of the servers and potentially impacts the performance of applications based on the servers.

2. Hidden memory leaks

Due to the low-level memory management among JVMs, memory leaks are not easy to detect at times. There is a risk of heap memory accumulating unused objects and over-consuming memory than that is allocated by the admin. This makes locating leaks challenging, and fixing the memory leak before it affects overall server performance becomes close to impossible.

3. Thread contention and deadlocks

Thread contention, starvation, and deadlocks can slow your java application down. Troubleshooting these issues usually involves monitoring and analyzing thread dumps in real-time, which is tedious and close to impossible with short-lived JVMS instances. Such critical observations are not scalable for applications that operate for a diverse user base, especially during production incidents. In these cases, minor overlooks can escalate to severe application downtime.

4. Overwhelming metrics and labels

Java applications come with numerous key performance indicators that generate large chunks of performance data across user sessions, transactions, and services. These metrics are dynamic and come with unique behavior that depends on the size of the user base and the enterprise. Such volumes of data can overload monitoring tools, affecting aggregation and precision in performance analysis and anomaly prediction. This can blind your visibility into the performance of your applications and services.

5. Excessive alert noise

JVM KPIs fluctuate depending on load, peak hours, and background tasks. Traditional thresholds can’t keep up with their dynamic behavior. This causes alert noise; an avalanche of unimportant alarms that overshadow critical issues that might need immediate attention. Alert noise and false alarms lead to inefficient issue resolution and overlooked incidents that affect overall performance and user experience severely.

Overcoming JVM Monitoring Challenges

"Overcoming JVM monitoring challenges" might sound like a herculean task, but with the right strategies and monitoring solutions, you can master it like a pro. Here are the key techniques that can strengthen your JVM monitoring approach:

  • Real-time KPI tracking: Track KPIs like thread pools, garbage collection activity, memory, latency, and throughput in real time to understand JVM performance.
  • JMX metric support: Use JMX (Java Management Extensions) to gain deeper insights into Java-based services like Tomcat or JBoss. Monitor connection pools, thread usage, and service-specific behaviors as you go.
  • Historical performance data: Leverage historical analysis to detect recurring patterns, slow-building issues, and root causes that hide behind real-time snapshots.
  • Smart alerting systems: Assign severity-based alerts and streamline communication across Slack, email, or SMS. Trigger responsive actions and automate escalation to ensure quicker fixes.
  • Adaptive thresholds: Configure adaptive thresholds that scale-up with dynamic application loads to reduce false alarms and enhance alert reliability.
  • Scalability: Make sure your monitoring solution grows with your infrastructure; whether it is a small production environment or an enterprise-wide deployment.
  • Unified platform: Adopt a centralized console that draws JVM, application, infrastructure, and user experience metrics under one roof. This helps in enhancing correlation and dependency mapping; speeding up root cause analysis and thereby issue resolution.

ManageEngine Applications Manager is one of the widely recommended monitoring solutions in the market. It brings together all the above capabilities into one console. It offers in-depth visibility into JVM environments and Java applications while also supporting over 150 technologies including databases, servers, cloud services, containers, middleware, and more. Whether you’re optimizing garbage collection or investigating thread deadlocks, Applications Manager helps you do it all from a unified, scalable platform. Try the 30-day free trial or schedule a demo to explore its capabilities.

Sujitha Paduchuri is a Content Writer at ManageEngine, a division of Zohocorp

Hot Topics

The Latest

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

40% of organizations deploying AI will implement dedicated AI observability tools by 2028 to monitor model performance, bias and outputs, according to Gartner ...

Until AI-powered engineering tools have live visibility of how code behaves at runtime, they cannot be trusted to autonomously ensure reliable systems, according to the State of AI-Powered Engineering Report 2026 report from Lightrun. The report reveals that a major volume of manual work is required when AI-generated code is deployed: 43% of AI-generated code requires manual debugging in production, even after passing QA or staging tests. Furthermore, an average of three manual redeploy cycles are required to verify a single AI-suggested code fix in production ...

Many organizations describe AI as strategic, but they do not manage it strategically. When AI plans are disconnected from strategy, detached from organizational learning, and protected from serious assumptions testing, the problem is no longer technical immaturity; it is a failure of management discipline ... Executives too often tell organizations to "use AI" before they define what AI is supposed to change. The problem deepens in organizations where strategy isn't well articulated in the first place ...

Across the enterprise technology landscape, a quiet crisis is playing out. Organizations have run hundreds, sometimes thousands, of generative AI pilots. Leadership has celebrated the proof of concept (POCs) ... Industry experience points to a sobering reality: only 5-10% of AI POCs that progress to the pilot stage successfully reach scaled production. The remaining 90% fail because the enterprise environment around them was never ready to absorb them, not the AI models ...

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...