Skip to main content

JVM Monitoring Challenges: What to Watch Out for in 2025

Sujitha Paduchuri
ManageEngine

JVM monitoring is crucial for java-based environments, to gain visibility into the performance and operations of VMs. It helps them understand the behavior of KPIs like memory and CPU utilization, threads, and garbage collection. These insights help administrators identify performance anomalies, locate erroneous corners in JVM environments, and fix ailments that cause issues like application downtime, unavailable services, data request saturation, and slow servers.

But JVM monitoring is not as simple and straightforward as it seems. Without an efficient JVM monitoring strategy and a dedicated tool, admins are left with numerous interdependent metrics to track and large chunks of historical data to analyze. In this article, we talk about common challenges encountered by ITOps and DevOps teams while monitoring JVM ecosystems and how to tackle them with an efficient JVM performance monitoring solution.

Top 5 Challenges in JVM Monitoring

1. Blind-spots in garbage collection

Garbage collection is crucial for seamless JVM operations. While traditional JVM monitoring tech can track GC activity, teams fail at correlating GC pauses and anomalies with the rest of the JVM performance metrics. Delays in Garbage Collection are only discovered when there is a spike in latency or response time, after it is too late to prevent the effect on end user experience. This affects the overall efficiency of the servers and potentially impacts the performance of applications based on the servers.

2. Hidden memory leaks

Due to the low-level memory management among JVMs, memory leaks are not easy to detect at times. There is a risk of heap memory accumulating unused objects and over-consuming memory than that is allocated by the admin. This makes locating leaks challenging, and fixing the memory leak before it affects overall server performance becomes close to impossible.

3. Thread contention and deadlocks

Thread contention, starvation, and deadlocks can slow your java application down. Troubleshooting these issues usually involves monitoring and analyzing thread dumps in real-time, which is tedious and close to impossible with short-lived JVMS instances. Such critical observations are not scalable for applications that operate for a diverse user base, especially during production incidents. In these cases, minor overlooks can escalate to severe application downtime.

4. Overwhelming metrics and labels

Java applications come with numerous key performance indicators that generate large chunks of performance data across user sessions, transactions, and services. These metrics are dynamic and come with unique behavior that depends on the size of the user base and the enterprise. Such volumes of data can overload monitoring tools, affecting aggregation and precision in performance analysis and anomaly prediction. This can blind your visibility into the performance of your applications and services.

5. Excessive alert noise

JVM KPIs fluctuate depending on load, peak hours, and background tasks. Traditional thresholds can’t keep up with their dynamic behavior. This causes alert noise; an avalanche of unimportant alarms that overshadow critical issues that might need immediate attention. Alert noise and false alarms lead to inefficient issue resolution and overlooked incidents that affect overall performance and user experience severely.

Overcoming JVM Monitoring Challenges

"Overcoming JVM monitoring challenges" might sound like a herculean task, but with the right strategies and monitoring solutions, you can master it like a pro. Here are the key techniques that can strengthen your JVM monitoring approach:

  • Real-time KPI tracking: Track KPIs like thread pools, garbage collection activity, memory, latency, and throughput in real time to understand JVM performance.
  • JMX metric support: Use JMX (Java Management Extensions) to gain deeper insights into Java-based services like Tomcat or JBoss. Monitor connection pools, thread usage, and service-specific behaviors as you go.
  • Historical performance data: Leverage historical analysis to detect recurring patterns, slow-building issues, and root causes that hide behind real-time snapshots.
  • Smart alerting systems: Assign severity-based alerts and streamline communication across Slack, email, or SMS. Trigger responsive actions and automate escalation to ensure quicker fixes.
  • Adaptive thresholds: Configure adaptive thresholds that scale-up with dynamic application loads to reduce false alarms and enhance alert reliability.
  • Scalability: Make sure your monitoring solution grows with your infrastructure; whether it is a small production environment or an enterprise-wide deployment.
  • Unified platform: Adopt a centralized console that draws JVM, application, infrastructure, and user experience metrics under one roof. This helps in enhancing correlation and dependency mapping; speeding up root cause analysis and thereby issue resolution.

ManageEngine Applications Manager is one of the widely recommended monitoring solutions in the market. It brings together all the above capabilities into one console. It offers in-depth visibility into JVM environments and Java applications while also supporting over 150 technologies including databases, servers, cloud services, containers, middleware, and more. Whether you’re optimizing garbage collection or investigating thread deadlocks, Applications Manager helps you do it all from a unified, scalable platform. Try the 30-day free trial or schedule a demo to explore its capabilities.

Sujitha Paduchuri is a Content Writer at ManageEngine, a division of Zohocorp

Hot Topics

The Latest

Many organizations describe AI as strategic, but they do not manage it strategically. When AI plans are disconnected from strategy, detached from organizational learning, and protected from serious assumptions testing, the problem is no longer technical immaturity; it is a failure of management discipline ... Executives too often tell organizations to "use AI" before they define what AI is supposed to change. The problem deepens in organizations where strategy isn't well articulated in the first place ...

Across the enterprise technology landscape, a quiet crisis is playing out. Organizations have run hundreds, sometimes thousands, of generative AI pilots. Leadership has celebrated the proof of concept (POCs) ... Industry experience points to a sobering reality: only 5-10% of AI POCs that progress to the pilot stage successfully reach scaled production. The remaining 90% fail because the enterprise environment around them was never ready to absorb them, not the AI models ...

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...

Technology leaders across the federal landscape are facing, and will continue to face, an uphill battle when it comes to fortifying their digital environments against hostile and persistent threat actors. On one hand, they are being asked to push digital transformation ... On the other hand, they are facing the fiscal uncertainty of continuing resolutions (CR) and government shutdowns looming near and far. In the face of these challenges, CIOs, CTOs, and CISOs must figure out how to modernize legacy systems and infrastructure while doing more with less and still defending against external and internal threats ...

Reliability is no longer proven by uptime alone, according to the The SRE Report 2026 from LogicMonitor. In the AI era, it is experienced through speed, consistency, and user trust, and increasingly judged by business impact. As digital services grow more complex and AI systems move into production, traditional monitoring approaches are struggling to keep pace, increasing the need for AI-first observability that spans applications, infrastructure, and the Internet ...

If AI is the engine of a modern organization, then data engineering is the road system beneath it. You can build the most powerful engine in the world, but without paved roads, traffic signals, and bridges that can support its weight, it will stall. In many enterprises, the engine is ready. The roads are not ...

In the world of digital-first business, there is no tolerance for service outages. Businesses know that outages are the quickest way to lose money and customers. For smaller organizations, unplanned downtime could even force the business to close ... A new study from PagerDuty, The State of AI-First Operations, reveals that companies actively incorporating AI into operations now view operational resilience as a growth driver rather than a cost center. But how are they achieving it? ...

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

JVM Monitoring Challenges: What to Watch Out for in 2025

Sujitha Paduchuri
ManageEngine

JVM monitoring is crucial for java-based environments, to gain visibility into the performance and operations of VMs. It helps them understand the behavior of KPIs like memory and CPU utilization, threads, and garbage collection. These insights help administrators identify performance anomalies, locate erroneous corners in JVM environments, and fix ailments that cause issues like application downtime, unavailable services, data request saturation, and slow servers.

But JVM monitoring is not as simple and straightforward as it seems. Without an efficient JVM monitoring strategy and a dedicated tool, admins are left with numerous interdependent metrics to track and large chunks of historical data to analyze. In this article, we talk about common challenges encountered by ITOps and DevOps teams while monitoring JVM ecosystems and how to tackle them with an efficient JVM performance monitoring solution.

Top 5 Challenges in JVM Monitoring

1. Blind-spots in garbage collection

Garbage collection is crucial for seamless JVM operations. While traditional JVM monitoring tech can track GC activity, teams fail at correlating GC pauses and anomalies with the rest of the JVM performance metrics. Delays in Garbage Collection are only discovered when there is a spike in latency or response time, after it is too late to prevent the effect on end user experience. This affects the overall efficiency of the servers and potentially impacts the performance of applications based on the servers.

2. Hidden memory leaks

Due to the low-level memory management among JVMs, memory leaks are not easy to detect at times. There is a risk of heap memory accumulating unused objects and over-consuming memory than that is allocated by the admin. This makes locating leaks challenging, and fixing the memory leak before it affects overall server performance becomes close to impossible.

3. Thread contention and deadlocks

Thread contention, starvation, and deadlocks can slow your java application down. Troubleshooting these issues usually involves monitoring and analyzing thread dumps in real-time, which is tedious and close to impossible with short-lived JVMS instances. Such critical observations are not scalable for applications that operate for a diverse user base, especially during production incidents. In these cases, minor overlooks can escalate to severe application downtime.

4. Overwhelming metrics and labels

Java applications come with numerous key performance indicators that generate large chunks of performance data across user sessions, transactions, and services. These metrics are dynamic and come with unique behavior that depends on the size of the user base and the enterprise. Such volumes of data can overload monitoring tools, affecting aggregation and precision in performance analysis and anomaly prediction. This can blind your visibility into the performance of your applications and services.

5. Excessive alert noise

JVM KPIs fluctuate depending on load, peak hours, and background tasks. Traditional thresholds can’t keep up with their dynamic behavior. This causes alert noise; an avalanche of unimportant alarms that overshadow critical issues that might need immediate attention. Alert noise and false alarms lead to inefficient issue resolution and overlooked incidents that affect overall performance and user experience severely.

Overcoming JVM Monitoring Challenges

"Overcoming JVM monitoring challenges" might sound like a herculean task, but with the right strategies and monitoring solutions, you can master it like a pro. Here are the key techniques that can strengthen your JVM monitoring approach:

  • Real-time KPI tracking: Track KPIs like thread pools, garbage collection activity, memory, latency, and throughput in real time to understand JVM performance.
  • JMX metric support: Use JMX (Java Management Extensions) to gain deeper insights into Java-based services like Tomcat or JBoss. Monitor connection pools, thread usage, and service-specific behaviors as you go.
  • Historical performance data: Leverage historical analysis to detect recurring patterns, slow-building issues, and root causes that hide behind real-time snapshots.
  • Smart alerting systems: Assign severity-based alerts and streamline communication across Slack, email, or SMS. Trigger responsive actions and automate escalation to ensure quicker fixes.
  • Adaptive thresholds: Configure adaptive thresholds that scale-up with dynamic application loads to reduce false alarms and enhance alert reliability.
  • Scalability: Make sure your monitoring solution grows with your infrastructure; whether it is a small production environment or an enterprise-wide deployment.
  • Unified platform: Adopt a centralized console that draws JVM, application, infrastructure, and user experience metrics under one roof. This helps in enhancing correlation and dependency mapping; speeding up root cause analysis and thereby issue resolution.

ManageEngine Applications Manager is one of the widely recommended monitoring solutions in the market. It brings together all the above capabilities into one console. It offers in-depth visibility into JVM environments and Java applications while also supporting over 150 technologies including databases, servers, cloud services, containers, middleware, and more. Whether you’re optimizing garbage collection or investigating thread deadlocks, Applications Manager helps you do it all from a unified, scalable platform. Try the 30-day free trial or schedule a demo to explore its capabilities.

Sujitha Paduchuri is a Content Writer at ManageEngine, a division of Zohocorp

Hot Topics

The Latest

Many organizations describe AI as strategic, but they do not manage it strategically. When AI plans are disconnected from strategy, detached from organizational learning, and protected from serious assumptions testing, the problem is no longer technical immaturity; it is a failure of management discipline ... Executives too often tell organizations to "use AI" before they define what AI is supposed to change. The problem deepens in organizations where strategy isn't well articulated in the first place ...

Across the enterprise technology landscape, a quiet crisis is playing out. Organizations have run hundreds, sometimes thousands, of generative AI pilots. Leadership has celebrated the proof of concept (POCs) ... Industry experience points to a sobering reality: only 5-10% of AI POCs that progress to the pilot stage successfully reach scaled production. The remaining 90% fail because the enterprise environment around them was never ready to absorb them, not the AI models ...

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...

Technology leaders across the federal landscape are facing, and will continue to face, an uphill battle when it comes to fortifying their digital environments against hostile and persistent threat actors. On one hand, they are being asked to push digital transformation ... On the other hand, they are facing the fiscal uncertainty of continuing resolutions (CR) and government shutdowns looming near and far. In the face of these challenges, CIOs, CTOs, and CISOs must figure out how to modernize legacy systems and infrastructure while doing more with less and still defending against external and internal threats ...

Reliability is no longer proven by uptime alone, according to the The SRE Report 2026 from LogicMonitor. In the AI era, it is experienced through speed, consistency, and user trust, and increasingly judged by business impact. As digital services grow more complex and AI systems move into production, traditional monitoring approaches are struggling to keep pace, increasing the need for AI-first observability that spans applications, infrastructure, and the Internet ...

If AI is the engine of a modern organization, then data engineering is the road system beneath it. You can build the most powerful engine in the world, but without paved roads, traffic signals, and bridges that can support its weight, it will stall. In many enterprises, the engine is ready. The roads are not ...

In the world of digital-first business, there is no tolerance for service outages. Businesses know that outages are the quickest way to lose money and customers. For smaller organizations, unplanned downtime could even force the business to close ... A new study from PagerDuty, The State of AI-First Operations, reveals that companies actively incorporating AI into operations now view operational resilience as a growth driver rather than a cost center. But how are they achieving it? ...

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...