Skip to main content

Why AI Is the Differentiator for Operationally Resilient Organizations

Eric Johnson
PagerDuty

In the world of digital-first business, there is no tolerance for service outages. Businesses know that outages are the quickest way to lose money and customers. For smaller organizations, unplanned downtime could even force the business to close.

That's why having "good enough" operational resilience is no longer enough, and minimizing downtime is now a business imperative. In a bid to optimize resilience, many businesses have adopted AI to solve their operations headaches, and this mentality has propelled AI from a tool for early tech adopters to an indispensable part of the operations team's suite.

A new study from PagerDuty, The State of AI-First Operations, reveals that companies actively incorporating AI into operations now view operational resilience as a growth driver rather than a cost center. But how are they achieving it?

Downtime Costs Money and Reputation

The financial stakes couldn't be higher. More than two-thirds (68%) of organizations lose more than $300,000 per hour during IT incidents, and a third lose at least $500,000. For nearly a tenth of organizations, the figure can top $1m per hour. These high costs place intense pressure on organizations to preserve customer trust, investor confidence and the bottom line.

But it doesn't stop there. Incidents also create more pervasive problems around reduced staff productivity and an increase in developer burnout. The latter can be particularly insidious when organizations are already struggling to retain their top engineering talent. If staff are continuously dragged out of bed in the middle of the night or pulled away from their work to handle alert pings, they're more likely to leave for a competitor that can offer a better work-life balance. Those left guarding the fort will be even more stretched and demotivated.

AI is part of the problem, as well as the solution. As more companies roll out customer service chatbots, coding assistants and business process agents, they also expose themselves to more outage risks. More than four in five business report experiencing at least one AI-related outage.

This all creates a clear mandate for the C-suite: reduce the number of incidents and accelerate recovery times, and you will turn resilience into a competitive advantage. Almost all (95%) of survey respondents say their leadership understands this.

The AI Difference

Business and technology leaders are not just understanding the need for operational resilience. They're also taking action.

The "AI pioneers" are more likely (75%) to say they are operationally mature than the organizations that are discussing, but not deploying, the technology (66%). The difference is that mature organizations can recognize the value of AI at every stage of the incident resolution pipeline.

AI-first operations management tools reduce noise and streamline triage by grouping alerts into a single incident, and auto-pausing notifications for transient issues that are often resolved on their own. AI agents can also run auto-diagnostics via one-click runbooks, establishing contributing factors before humans are brought in. Alerts are then directed to the most appropriate subject matter expert (SME) based on expertise, workload and past response times. Together, these features save time and reduce alert fatigue for responders.

For more common and recurring incident types, AI agents can take on remediation and recovery autonomously, reducing the need for manual intervention. Their value in digital operations lies in the ability to operate through a continuous cycle of perceiving, reasoning, acting and learning independent of human teams. That's not just useful for remediation, but also tasks like capturing information for post-incident reviews and coordinating on-call schedules for SMEs.

Generative AI (GenAI) also plays a complementary role. It can support SMEs as a chatbot-based assistant, helping them query and investigate incidents in real-time, while also enabling proactive and automated customer-facing status updates.

The real differentiation comes from AI that operates across the entire technology stack to anticipate and prevent incidents before they ever impact customers. This shifts digital operations towards a proactive model, freeing SMEs to focus on innovation stepping in only during the most challenging incidents.

Beyond Resilience

Organizations are keen to embrace this future, seeing benefits that go beyond operational resilience to broader improvements in how operations teams work. More than two-fifths of organizations surveyed expect AI-first digital operations to improve competitiveness by allowing them more time for innovation and experimentation.

The shift to AI-first operations can also help to mitigate current talent shortages by appealing to existing employees and prospective hires. A growing number of engineers recognize that AI could liberate them from repetitive and manual toil, rather than serve as a potential rival.

Trust in the Future

Not all operations leaders are fully sold on AI. Confidence is higher for tasks like incident analysis than for activities with direct customer impact, which is why many organizations stop short of granting full autonomy in some situations. Keeping a human in the loop remains a sensible way for organizations to strike the right balance between efficiency and control.

These concerns, however, should not slow the pace of adoption. Boards that commit to AI-driven operations are starting to pull away from their competitors, demonstrating how the function can evolve from reactive response to proactive prevention.

The direction is clear, and the gap will widen for those that delay.

Eric Johnson is Chief Information Officer at PagerDuty

Hot Topics

The Latest

In the world of digital-first business, there is no tolerance for service outages. Businesses know that outages are the quickest way to lose money and customers. For smaller organizations, unplanned downtime could even force the business to close ... A new study from PagerDuty, The State of AI-First Operations, reveals that companies actively incorporating AI into operations now view operational resilience as a growth driver rather than a cost center. But how are they achieving it? ...

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

Why AI Is the Differentiator for Operationally Resilient Organizations

Eric Johnson
PagerDuty

In the world of digital-first business, there is no tolerance for service outages. Businesses know that outages are the quickest way to lose money and customers. For smaller organizations, unplanned downtime could even force the business to close.

That's why having "good enough" operational resilience is no longer enough, and minimizing downtime is now a business imperative. In a bid to optimize resilience, many businesses have adopted AI to solve their operations headaches, and this mentality has propelled AI from a tool for early tech adopters to an indispensable part of the operations team's suite.

A new study from PagerDuty, The State of AI-First Operations, reveals that companies actively incorporating AI into operations now view operational resilience as a growth driver rather than a cost center. But how are they achieving it?

Downtime Costs Money and Reputation

The financial stakes couldn't be higher. More than two-thirds (68%) of organizations lose more than $300,000 per hour during IT incidents, and a third lose at least $500,000. For nearly a tenth of organizations, the figure can top $1m per hour. These high costs place intense pressure on organizations to preserve customer trust, investor confidence and the bottom line.

But it doesn't stop there. Incidents also create more pervasive problems around reduced staff productivity and an increase in developer burnout. The latter can be particularly insidious when organizations are already struggling to retain their top engineering talent. If staff are continuously dragged out of bed in the middle of the night or pulled away from their work to handle alert pings, they're more likely to leave for a competitor that can offer a better work-life balance. Those left guarding the fort will be even more stretched and demotivated.

AI is part of the problem, as well as the solution. As more companies roll out customer service chatbots, coding assistants and business process agents, they also expose themselves to more outage risks. More than four in five business report experiencing at least one AI-related outage.

This all creates a clear mandate for the C-suite: reduce the number of incidents and accelerate recovery times, and you will turn resilience into a competitive advantage. Almost all (95%) of survey respondents say their leadership understands this.

The AI Difference

Business and technology leaders are not just understanding the need for operational resilience. They're also taking action.

The "AI pioneers" are more likely (75%) to say they are operationally mature than the organizations that are discussing, but not deploying, the technology (66%). The difference is that mature organizations can recognize the value of AI at every stage of the incident resolution pipeline.

AI-first operations management tools reduce noise and streamline triage by grouping alerts into a single incident, and auto-pausing notifications for transient issues that are often resolved on their own. AI agents can also run auto-diagnostics via one-click runbooks, establishing contributing factors before humans are brought in. Alerts are then directed to the most appropriate subject matter expert (SME) based on expertise, workload and past response times. Together, these features save time and reduce alert fatigue for responders.

For more common and recurring incident types, AI agents can take on remediation and recovery autonomously, reducing the need for manual intervention. Their value in digital operations lies in the ability to operate through a continuous cycle of perceiving, reasoning, acting and learning independent of human teams. That's not just useful for remediation, but also tasks like capturing information for post-incident reviews and coordinating on-call schedules for SMEs.

Generative AI (GenAI) also plays a complementary role. It can support SMEs as a chatbot-based assistant, helping them query and investigate incidents in real-time, while also enabling proactive and automated customer-facing status updates.

The real differentiation comes from AI that operates across the entire technology stack to anticipate and prevent incidents before they ever impact customers. This shifts digital operations towards a proactive model, freeing SMEs to focus on innovation stepping in only during the most challenging incidents.

Beyond Resilience

Organizations are keen to embrace this future, seeing benefits that go beyond operational resilience to broader improvements in how operations teams work. More than two-fifths of organizations surveyed expect AI-first digital operations to improve competitiveness by allowing them more time for innovation and experimentation.

The shift to AI-first operations can also help to mitigate current talent shortages by appealing to existing employees and prospective hires. A growing number of engineers recognize that AI could liberate them from repetitive and manual toil, rather than serve as a potential rival.

Trust in the Future

Not all operations leaders are fully sold on AI. Confidence is higher for tasks like incident analysis than for activities with direct customer impact, which is why many organizations stop short of granting full autonomy in some situations. Keeping a human in the loop remains a sensible way for organizations to strike the right balance between efficiency and control.

These concerns, however, should not slow the pace of adoption. Boards that commit to AI-driven operations are starting to pull away from their competitors, demonstrating how the function can evolve from reactive response to proactive prevention.

The direction is clear, and the gap will widen for those that delay.

Eric Johnson is Chief Information Officer at PagerDuty

Hot Topics

The Latest

In the world of digital-first business, there is no tolerance for service outages. Businesses know that outages are the quickest way to lose money and customers. For smaller organizations, unplanned downtime could even force the business to close ... A new study from PagerDuty, The State of AI-First Operations, reveals that companies actively incorporating AI into operations now view operational resilience as a growth driver rather than a cost center. But how are they achieving it? ...

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...