Skip to main content

3 Tips for Keeping Kubernetes Costs Low

Michael Cade
Kasten by Veeam

Kubernetes is taking the IT world by storm – according to Red Hat, 68% of IT leaders are currently running containers in their organization, with nearly one-third planning to significantly increase usage within the year. With a projected market size of $7.8 billion by 2030, it's clear Kubernetes is here to stay.


However, recent findings from Pepperdata highlight one of the biggest challenges in the industry: surprise costs. The survey of IT leaders found that surprise costs ranked highest among key challenges, with nearly 60% experiencing significant or unexpected spending on computation, storage networking infrastructures and cloud-based IaaS. As the platform continues to permeate nearly every industry imaginable, managing unexpected costs is going to be top of mind for Kubernetes practitioners.

Prior to undertaking a Kubernetes deployment, IT leaders need to be aware of the potential pitfalls and how to address them, and optimizing costs might be the most important consideration. Kubernetes has the ability to run stateful workloads at scale and can even autoscale to achieve cost optimization in a more agile way. However, leaders must ensure their deployments meet the specific needs of the organizations, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.

Once initial actions have been addressed, it's important for IT leaders to look at three ways to keep surprise costs low and optimize their spend, all without having to scale back on deployments.

1. Autoscale, Autoscale, Autoscale

Autoscaling helps IT leaders ensure that their containers are running in a stable way during times of peak demand, while keeping costs low during slower periods. Failure to implement autoscaling can result in a slow drain on resources, as users pay for resources that aren't being used during low demand hours, and even a freeze on the system (if it cannot keep up with peak demand).

According to Kubernetes.io, horizontal pod autoscaling (HPA) is a powerful tool that allows users to automatically scale the workload to meet demand. It tells the workload resource to either scale up or down – which is done by adding or reducing the number of pods, respectively – dependent on the current workload.

HPA is an incredibly effective way to manage resources and help IT leaders optimize the infrastructure of their clusters. For some, however, vertical pod autoscaling (VPA) may be a more attractive option. VPA assigns more resources to the pods that are already running for the workload, which is helpful for organizations that are unable to define a proper number of resources.

It's important to do research and understand which method is most effective for your business before implementing autoscaling policies, but both are useful to keep day-to-day costs steady.

2. Lowering Compute Costs with Spot Instances

Spot instances refer to computing capacity that isn't being used, usually sitting in the cloud or sometimes on-premises. Cloud providers need to have a certain amount of capacity available because they promise scalability to customers, but it often sits unused for flexibility purposes.

In some cases, Kubernetes users can actually receive large discounts from their provider by incentivizing them to use up this extra capacity, rather than letting it sit empty. The caveat is that the cloud providers can take the capacity back when they need it, and Kubernetes users would have to drain the pods in the cluster and return the capacity. Spot instances also require an upfront cost to reserve the instance, should you need it.

However, according to a D Zone and Kasten report, using spot instances properly can help users reduce their overall computer bill in the cloud by 65-90%. That's huge in terms of real dollars and is a really simple way to manage overall Kubernetes computing costs.

However, it's important to note that these cost savings can come at the risk of losing capacity when you need it. What's more important to you – ensuring total reliability all the time, or saving big on cloud costs to keep your deployments under budget? These are key questions to ask during the process.

Don't Forget to Reschedule!

The report also notes that configuring pod disruption budgets is a great way to avoid disruption in your Kubernetes workloads. But to start, make sure to reschedule your pods from time to time to ensure they're running at maximum efficiency.

Kubernetes is great about putting pods in the right spot at the right time, but they may be more efficient in other spots later on. Rescheduling your pods frequently to keep usage in the cluster running at optimal capacity is another simple way to optimize computing costs.

Kubernetes is a rapidly growing – and yet incredibly mature – industry that is beginning to touch all aspects of the business world. However it's clear that organizations are struggling to both anticipate and manage the additional costs that come with their complex workloads.

The impact of Kubernetes will only increase in the coming years, so it's important to arm yourself with the proper skills to stay ahead. Following these simple steps is a great way to begin, and beginners can also get up to speed quickly with various learning courses. Though the current knowledge gap in Kubernetes is a top issue facing developers and organizations as a whole, sharing what we know with our peers is the best way our community can support itself.

Michael Cade is the Global Field CTO for Kasten by Veeam

The Latest

While 87% of manufacturing leaders and technical specialists report that ROI from their AIOps initiatives has met or exceeded expectations, only 37% say they are fully prepared to operationalize AI at scale, according to The Future of IT Operations in the AI Era, a report from Riverbed ...

Many organizations rely on cloud-first architectures to aggregate, analyze, and act on their operational data ... However, not all environments are conducive to cloud-first architectures ... There are limitations to cloud-first architectures that render them ineffective in mission-critical situations where responsiveness, cost control, and data sovereignty are non-negotiable; these limitations include ...

For years, cybersecurity was built around a simple assumption: protect the physical network and trust everything inside it. That model made sense when employees worked in offices, applications lived in data centers, and devices rarely left the building. Today's reality is fluid: people work from everywhere, applications run across multiple clouds, and AI-driven agents are beginning to act on behalf of users. But while the old perimeter dissolved, a new one quietly emerged ...

For years, infrastructure teams have treated compute as a relatively stable input. Capacity was provisioned, costs were forecasted, and performance expectations were set based on the assumption that identical resources behaved identically. That mental model is starting to break down. AI infrastructure is no longer behaving like static cloud capacity. It is increasingly behaving like a market ...

Resilience can no longer be defined by how quickly an organization recovers from an incident or disruption. The effectiveness of any resilience strategy is dependent on its ability to anticipate change, operate under continuous stress, and adapt confidently amid uncertainty ...

Mobile users are less tolerant of app instability than ever before. According to a new report from Luciq, No Margin for Error: What Mobile Users Expect and What Mobile Leaders Must Deliver in 2026, even minor performance issues now result in immediate abandonment, lost purchases, and long-term brand impact ...

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become the dominant force shaping enterprise data strategies. Boards expect progress. Executives expect returns. And data leaders are under pressure to prove that their organizations are "AI-ready" ...

Agentic AI is a major buzzword for 2026. Many tech companies are making bold promises about this technology, but many aren't grounded in reality, at least not yet. This coming year will likely be shaped by reality checks for IT teams, and progress will only come from a focus on strong foundations and disciplined execution ...

AI systems are still prone to hallucinations and misjudgments ... To build the trust needed for adoption, AI must be paired with human-in-the-loop (HITL) oversight, or checkpoints where humans verify, guide, and decide what actions are taken. The balance between autonomy and accountability is what will allow AI to deliver on its promise without sacrificing human trust ...

More data center leaders are reducing their reliance on utility grids by investing in onsite power for rapidly scaling data centers, according to the Data Center Power Report from Bloom Energy ...

3 Tips for Keeping Kubernetes Costs Low

Michael Cade
Kasten by Veeam

Kubernetes is taking the IT world by storm – according to Red Hat, 68% of IT leaders are currently running containers in their organization, with nearly one-third planning to significantly increase usage within the year. With a projected market size of $7.8 billion by 2030, it's clear Kubernetes is here to stay.


However, recent findings from Pepperdata highlight one of the biggest challenges in the industry: surprise costs. The survey of IT leaders found that surprise costs ranked highest among key challenges, with nearly 60% experiencing significant or unexpected spending on computation, storage networking infrastructures and cloud-based IaaS. As the platform continues to permeate nearly every industry imaginable, managing unexpected costs is going to be top of mind for Kubernetes practitioners.

Prior to undertaking a Kubernetes deployment, IT leaders need to be aware of the potential pitfalls and how to address them, and optimizing costs might be the most important consideration. Kubernetes has the ability to run stateful workloads at scale and can even autoscale to achieve cost optimization in a more agile way. However, leaders must ensure their deployments meet the specific needs of the organizations, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.

Once initial actions have been addressed, it's important for IT leaders to look at three ways to keep surprise costs low and optimize their spend, all without having to scale back on deployments.

1. Autoscale, Autoscale, Autoscale

Autoscaling helps IT leaders ensure that their containers are running in a stable way during times of peak demand, while keeping costs low during slower periods. Failure to implement autoscaling can result in a slow drain on resources, as users pay for resources that aren't being used during low demand hours, and even a freeze on the system (if it cannot keep up with peak demand).

According to Kubernetes.io, horizontal pod autoscaling (HPA) is a powerful tool that allows users to automatically scale the workload to meet demand. It tells the workload resource to either scale up or down – which is done by adding or reducing the number of pods, respectively – dependent on the current workload.

HPA is an incredibly effective way to manage resources and help IT leaders optimize the infrastructure of their clusters. For some, however, vertical pod autoscaling (VPA) may be a more attractive option. VPA assigns more resources to the pods that are already running for the workload, which is helpful for organizations that are unable to define a proper number of resources.

It's important to do research and understand which method is most effective for your business before implementing autoscaling policies, but both are useful to keep day-to-day costs steady.

2. Lowering Compute Costs with Spot Instances

Spot instances refer to computing capacity that isn't being used, usually sitting in the cloud or sometimes on-premises. Cloud providers need to have a certain amount of capacity available because they promise scalability to customers, but it often sits unused for flexibility purposes.

In some cases, Kubernetes users can actually receive large discounts from their provider by incentivizing them to use up this extra capacity, rather than letting it sit empty. The caveat is that the cloud providers can take the capacity back when they need it, and Kubernetes users would have to drain the pods in the cluster and return the capacity. Spot instances also require an upfront cost to reserve the instance, should you need it.

However, according to a D Zone and Kasten report, using spot instances properly can help users reduce their overall computer bill in the cloud by 65-90%. That's huge in terms of real dollars and is a really simple way to manage overall Kubernetes computing costs.

However, it's important to note that these cost savings can come at the risk of losing capacity when you need it. What's more important to you – ensuring total reliability all the time, or saving big on cloud costs to keep your deployments under budget? These are key questions to ask during the process.

Don't Forget to Reschedule!

The report also notes that configuring pod disruption budgets is a great way to avoid disruption in your Kubernetes workloads. But to start, make sure to reschedule your pods from time to time to ensure they're running at maximum efficiency.

Kubernetes is great about putting pods in the right spot at the right time, but they may be more efficient in other spots later on. Rescheduling your pods frequently to keep usage in the cluster running at optimal capacity is another simple way to optimize computing costs.

Kubernetes is a rapidly growing – and yet incredibly mature – industry that is beginning to touch all aspects of the business world. However it's clear that organizations are struggling to both anticipate and manage the additional costs that come with their complex workloads.

The impact of Kubernetes will only increase in the coming years, so it's important to arm yourself with the proper skills to stay ahead. Following these simple steps is a great way to begin, and beginners can also get up to speed quickly with various learning courses. Though the current knowledge gap in Kubernetes is a top issue facing developers and organizations as a whole, sharing what we know with our peers is the best way our community can support itself.

Michael Cade is the Global Field CTO for Kasten by Veeam

The Latest

While 87% of manufacturing leaders and technical specialists report that ROI from their AIOps initiatives has met or exceeded expectations, only 37% say they are fully prepared to operationalize AI at scale, according to The Future of IT Operations in the AI Era, a report from Riverbed ...

Many organizations rely on cloud-first architectures to aggregate, analyze, and act on their operational data ... However, not all environments are conducive to cloud-first architectures ... There are limitations to cloud-first architectures that render them ineffective in mission-critical situations where responsiveness, cost control, and data sovereignty are non-negotiable; these limitations include ...

For years, cybersecurity was built around a simple assumption: protect the physical network and trust everything inside it. That model made sense when employees worked in offices, applications lived in data centers, and devices rarely left the building. Today's reality is fluid: people work from everywhere, applications run across multiple clouds, and AI-driven agents are beginning to act on behalf of users. But while the old perimeter dissolved, a new one quietly emerged ...

For years, infrastructure teams have treated compute as a relatively stable input. Capacity was provisioned, costs were forecasted, and performance expectations were set based on the assumption that identical resources behaved identically. That mental model is starting to break down. AI infrastructure is no longer behaving like static cloud capacity. It is increasingly behaving like a market ...

Resilience can no longer be defined by how quickly an organization recovers from an incident or disruption. The effectiveness of any resilience strategy is dependent on its ability to anticipate change, operate under continuous stress, and adapt confidently amid uncertainty ...

Mobile users are less tolerant of app instability than ever before. According to a new report from Luciq, No Margin for Error: What Mobile Users Expect and What Mobile Leaders Must Deliver in 2026, even minor performance issues now result in immediate abandonment, lost purchases, and long-term brand impact ...

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become the dominant force shaping enterprise data strategies. Boards expect progress. Executives expect returns. And data leaders are under pressure to prove that their organizations are "AI-ready" ...

Agentic AI is a major buzzword for 2026. Many tech companies are making bold promises about this technology, but many aren't grounded in reality, at least not yet. This coming year will likely be shaped by reality checks for IT teams, and progress will only come from a focus on strong foundations and disciplined execution ...

AI systems are still prone to hallucinations and misjudgments ... To build the trust needed for adoption, AI must be paired with human-in-the-loop (HITL) oversight, or checkpoints where humans verify, guide, and decide what actions are taken. The balance between autonomy and accountability is what will allow AI to deliver on its promise without sacrificing human trust ...

More data center leaders are reducing their reliance on utility grids by investing in onsite power for rapidly scaling data centers, according to the Data Center Power Report from Bloom Energy ...