Skip to main content

LaunchDarkly Adds Feature-Level Observability

LaunchDarkly unveiled key new AI capabilities and integrations that let developers ship software at even higher velocity while keeping risks at bay. 

These updates further the company’s vision for Self-Healing Software that allows engineers to focus on delivering amazing user experiences instead of anxiously awaiting late-night calls to fix bugs and outages.

The new observability updates provide closed-loop automation for de-bugging and quality control that transform how companies approach software quality and reliability.

The updates include:

  • Live view of feature performance: Adding session replay, error monitoring and APM data directly into the rollout surface gives developers a live view into how changes are performing without needing to wait on legacy alerts or hunt across APM dashboards. This closes the loop between code change and customer impact, dramatically reducing mean time to repair and building confidence to ship more often.
  • Regression attribution to metrics: Guarded Releases connect the dots between what changed (your feature flag) and what broke (your metric). No more guesswork, blame-pong, or digging through dashboards at 2 a.m. When a metric regresses, LaunchDarkly shows you the exact flag change that caused it and lets you roll it back with one click.
  • Session replay: provides full context into how a release impacts real users right down to clicks, rage-scrolls, and form abandons. You can finally pair telemetry data with human-readable truth. It's the fastest way to diagnose what actually happens when a release behaves badly, especially when the bug doesn’t trigger an alert.
  • Upcoming AI-Powered Diagnostics: The upcoming Vega AI agent will help eliminate the traditional "needle in a haystack" debugging process. Vega analyzes logs, traces, metrics, and session replays to identify root causes, generate timelines of what broke and why, and surface recommended code changes—turning noisy production data into actionable insights.

“While iterating quickly on products is paramount, organizations are becoming terrified of their own speed — they can find themselves flying blind on how their software is performing as they ship,” said Jay Khatri, Head of Observability at LaunchDarkly. “One bad release during peak season can cost millions in revenue and customer trust, which is why we’re so focused on moving from reactive damage control to proactive confidence.”

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

LaunchDarkly Adds Feature-Level Observability

LaunchDarkly unveiled key new AI capabilities and integrations that let developers ship software at even higher velocity while keeping risks at bay. 

These updates further the company’s vision for Self-Healing Software that allows engineers to focus on delivering amazing user experiences instead of anxiously awaiting late-night calls to fix bugs and outages.

The new observability updates provide closed-loop automation for de-bugging and quality control that transform how companies approach software quality and reliability.

The updates include:

  • Live view of feature performance: Adding session replay, error monitoring and APM data directly into the rollout surface gives developers a live view into how changes are performing without needing to wait on legacy alerts or hunt across APM dashboards. This closes the loop between code change and customer impact, dramatically reducing mean time to repair and building confidence to ship more often.
  • Regression attribution to metrics: Guarded Releases connect the dots between what changed (your feature flag) and what broke (your metric). No more guesswork, blame-pong, or digging through dashboards at 2 a.m. When a metric regresses, LaunchDarkly shows you the exact flag change that caused it and lets you roll it back with one click.
  • Session replay: provides full context into how a release impacts real users right down to clicks, rage-scrolls, and form abandons. You can finally pair telemetry data with human-readable truth. It's the fastest way to diagnose what actually happens when a release behaves badly, especially when the bug doesn’t trigger an alert.
  • Upcoming AI-Powered Diagnostics: The upcoming Vega AI agent will help eliminate the traditional "needle in a haystack" debugging process. Vega analyzes logs, traces, metrics, and session replays to identify root causes, generate timelines of what broke and why, and surface recommended code changes—turning noisy production data into actionable insights.

“While iterating quickly on products is paramount, organizations are becoming terrified of their own speed — they can find themselves flying blind on how their software is performing as they ship,” said Jay Khatri, Head of Observability at LaunchDarkly. “One bad release during peak season can cost millions in revenue and customer trust, which is why we’re so focused on moving from reactive damage control to proactive confidence.”

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.