
LogicMonitor announced major enhancements to its LM Envision platform.
These include continued innovation in AI agents with Edwin AI, the general availability of LM Uptime and Dynamic Service Insights, upcoming support for Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and a new platform pricing model designed to simplify adoption and scale with customers as their needs grow. Together, these innovations give enterprises the foresight to prevent outages, ensure service-level health and accelerate resolution across complex hybrid environments.
Edwin AI now delivers predictive resilience at scale, with customers reporting results such as reducing noise by more than 80% and cutting incidents by up to 67%. Many organizations see measurable improvements within the first hour, as the platform begins automating the initial steps of remediation. With these advancements, IT teams can move beyond reactive operations to proactive resilience, safeguarding uptime and freeing resources for innovation.
“IT leaders are overwhelmed by alert fatigue, rising complexity and outdated, reactive operations,” said Christina Kosmowski, CEO of LogicMonitor. “That model no longer works. With Edwin AI and our new service-level intelligence, we are giving teams the foresight to anticipate issues, prevent disruptions and keep their businesses running predictably and resiliently. In a world where downtime can cost millions an hour, proactive IT is not just smart, it is a business imperative.”
LM Uptime and Dynamic Service Insights (GA today) extend observability beyond infrastructure by mapping technology performance directly to business services. This service-level clarity enables IT leaders to pinpoint issues early, maintain SLAs and protect customer experience across on-premises, cloud, and edge systems. It also helps IT Operations teams and leaders articulate the business impact of the work they do and the technology they orchestrate.
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Monitoring (GA in October) will expand LogicMonitor’s multi-cloud coverage, providing unified visibility across AWS, Azure, GCP and now OCI. With OCI support, LogicMonitor strengthens its position as the broadest hybrid observability platform, helping enterprises eliminate tool sprawl and monitor every workload in one place.
To simplify adoption, LogicMonitor is introducing a new platform pricing model built around flexible Hybrid Units and three packages: Essentials, Advanced and Signature. This model provides customers with a predictable way to scale observability across devices, cloud instances, wireless and PaaS resources without adding complexity.
“Observability is no longer optional. It is the foundation of resilient, efficient and sustainable digital infrastructure,” said Garth Fort, Chief Product Officer at LogicMonitor. “With expanded service intelligence and predictable, simplified pricing, we are helping enterprises unify visibility, accelerate resolution and scale observability without unnecessary complexity. This positions our customers to thrive in the AI era.”
The new Edwin AI, Dynamic Service Insights, and LM Uptime products are available immediately, with OCI monitoring general availability in October.
The Latest
Production incidents rarely announce themselves as database problems. They appear as slow transactions, timeouts, rising response times, or an application struggling under a workload it previously handled. APM provides an essential starting point. It can identify a slow transaction path, highlight an affected service, and show that a database dependency is consuming more time than expected. But identifying the database as part of the problem is not the same as explaining what is happening inside it ...
Cloud teams are under constant pressure to reduce spend without slowing development or increasing operational risk. They are deploying autoscalers, rightsizing workloads, enforcing resource requests, reviewing utilization dashboards, and building FinOps processes around cloud-native environments. Yet the results often disappoint ...
Ask most IT leaders about their biggest concern with AI and you'll hear the same answer: hallucinations ... Today, however, the conversation has shifted ... As organizations move beyond chatbots and experiments, they are increasingly deploying AI agents that perform multi-step tasks. These systems retrieve documents, query databases, call APIs, generate reports, write code, and make recommendations. The issue is not whether the model can reason. The issue is whether the organization can see, verify, and govern the decisions being made along the way ...
While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...
For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...
As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...
The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...
The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...
Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...
Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...