Monte Carlo announced the launch of observability agents, a suite of AI agents built to accelerate monitoring and troubleshooting workflows to improve data + AI reliability.
Monte Carlo’s Monitoring Agent recommends data quality monitoring rules and thresholds, which can then be deployed with the push of a button. The Troubleshooting Agent investigates, verifies, and explains the root cause of specific data quality issues while also providing the recommended next steps for resolving them.
Both agents are are not just making simplistic recommendations based on data profiles, but leveraging a sophisticated network of LLMs, native integrations and subagents to gain full visibility into the data estate across data, systems, transformation code, and model outputs.
“AI agents are only as powerful as they are informed,” said Lior Gavish, co-founder and CTO, Monte Carlo. “Our AI agents can execute more sophisticated analyses that are truly useful because they are reviewing data samples to determine what the data looks like, metadata to understand the larger contextual meaning, and query logs to understand how the data is used.”
Monte Carlo’s Monitoring Agent, now generally available, identifies sophisticated patterns and relationships across a dataset that would otherwise be missed by more traditional profiling methods.
For example, the Monitoring Agent may identify that a product SKU id field always starts with “950” followed by 4 unique digits for certain product categories and not others, or that a certain product SKU always has a higher order amount than another. It uses context on how fields are used to prioritize and rank the most critical alerts – providing the most coverage with the least amount of noise.
It then automatically generates a monitor that can be easily understood and deployed across all members of the data team. To date, the Monitoring Agent has made thousands of monitor recommendations with an impressive 60% acceptance rate.
Gavish conservatively estimates the Monitoring Agent increases monitoring deployment efficiency by 30 percent or more.
Monte Carlo’s Troubleshooting Agent, with a general release scheduled for Q2 2025, investigates, verifies, and explains the root cause of specific data + AI quality issues.
The agent tests hundreds of different hypotheses across all relevant tables within a dataset to understand if the root cause of a specific issue is a result of receiving bad data from the source, an ETL system failure, a transformation code mistake, or incorrect model output.
This process leverages dozens of subagents investigating in parallel and takes only a couple of minutes to complete. As a result, data teams can reduce the average time to resolve an incident by 80 percent or more.
Monte Carlo continues to develop and deploy AI agents with a security first mindset. Customer data is never stored by Monte Carlo nor used to train AI models. Only users with the appropriate roles and permissions can access data samples, which can be disabled entirely if desired.
The observability agents automate powerful monitoring and resolution tasks, but never directly manipulate, change, or act upon your critical data and key systems (read-only). This ensures they don’t create more reliability issues than they help resolve.
Monte Carlo plans to extend the capabilities of these agents in the next year to further accelerate detection and resolution of reliability issues, providing end-to-end observability across the data + AI lifecycle. This represents a fundamental leap in Monte Carlo's strategic evolution from a standalone data observability pioneer to a comprehensive data + AI observability solution. By unifying monitoring and troubleshooting across both data pipelines and AI systems, Monte Carlo is addressing the critical need for consistent reliability standards as organizations increasingly invest in technologies to power their AI applications.
The Latest
In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...
Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ...
Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...
Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...
Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...
The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...
The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...
In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...
AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.