The education sector is undergoing significant change. National enrollment for higher education has declined 3 percent across the United States since 2015, according to the 2017 National Student Clearinghouse Research Center annual study. Decreased student enrollment is affecting many Higher education institutions and resulting in increased competition, student demands for more cutting-edge facilities, and shrinking profit margins, even as course fees reach all-time highs.
In one effort to respond to decreased admissions, many colleges and universities are focusing on a student-centered experience. For example, in addition to traditional classrooms, distance learning and mobile device support are being introduced to attract more millennials and older students. According to the 2017 Education infographic by Livestream, 77 percent of colleges offer online courses and 55 percent of college presidents predict that by 2022, all students will take at least some of their classes online.
However, implementing this new digital technology is not enough. Colleges and universities also need to ensure appropriate network and application performance for their remote distance learning feeds. Since live stream and on-demand video feeds are critically important, performance issues cannot be tolerated. This is a prime concern for both universities and K-12 institutions.
The key ingredient to optimum network and application performance is monitoring. You have to know what the network and its applications are, or are not, doing. Network visibility equipment, like taps and network packet brokers, can help.
Here is a list of clear visibility actions that can be implemented to address performance issues:
■ Remove on-premises blind spots – This is accomplished just by installing taps and network packet brokers (NPBs). These two components give you network performance monitoring (NPM) data access across your whole network.
■ Identify and document your network latency, on a per segment (as needed) basis – A proactive monitoring solution can be used to characterize your network. By actively testing between probes placed throughout your network, you can identify the latency, throughput, and quality of service across your whole network or just parts of it. This further allows you to understand performance issues and pinpoint where they occur.
■ Perform root cause analysis and debugging of performance issues – Once the taps and a packet brokers are installed, network data can be captured and sent to application performance monitoring (APM) tools for performance problem correlation and analysis to make sure that you maintain student quality of experience (QOE).
■ Remove cloud blind spots – Just as with the on-premises blind spot situation, cloud-based online education feeds can have issues as well. In this situation, a cloud visibility solution can be installed to collect packet-based data for those cloud apps and then the data can be passed on to an APM tool for analysis and QOE optimization.
■ Actively test network performance – When new applications are added to the network, this can affect network performance. A synthetic traffic generator allows you to respond to complaints about application or network slowness by actively testing different segments within your network to isolate and remediate problems faster. It can also be used to test software updates before they go live.
The diagram below illustrates how these technologies can be inserted into a generic education network.
The key point to remember is that acquiring the right monitoring data is the most important ingredient to creating and maintaining network and application performance.
The Latest
Interestingly, some experts say that — although convergence is happening, and sharing the data has great value — the security dashboards should not necessarily be combined with observability dashboards for ITOps, NetOps or DevOps ...
The experts have all agreed that security teams can gain great benefits from utilizing observability data. But does this mean security and observability tools should be integrated, or even combined? ...
One reason why observability and security make a good pairing is that traditional telemetry signals — metrics, logs, and traces — are helpful to maintain both performance and security ...
Observability and security — are they a match made in IT heaven, or a culture clash from IT hell? Sorry to be so dramatic, but it's actually a serious question that has gravity. The convergence of observability and security could change IT operations as we know it. And many IT authorities see this as a good thing. With input from industry experts — both analysts and vendors — this 8-part blog series to be posted over the next two weeks will explore what is driving this convergence, the challenges and advantages, and how it may transform the IT landscape ...
The journey of maturing observability practices for users entails navigating peaks and valleys. Users have clearly witnessed the maturation of their monitoring capabilities, embraced DevOps practices, and adopted cloud and cloud-native technologies. Notwithstanding that, we witness the gradual increase of the Mean Time To Recovery (MTTR) for production issues year over year ...