Skip to main content

Payment System Failures Put Canadian Businesses at Financial and Reputational Risk

Payment disruption is placing growing pressure on Canadian businesses. An estimated $7.6 billion in retail and hospitality sales is at risk each year due to payment system failures. 

A new collaborative report by FreedomPay, Dynatrace and Retail Economics reveals Canadians will wait just six minutes during a service outage before abandoning a purchase. However, the average outage lasts 67 minutes, leaving businesses susceptible to significant financial losses and potential damage to consumer trust and loyalty.

Canada is particularly vulnerable to payment disruptions, with businesses reporting almost seven (6.8) outages per year, a higher frequency than peers in the US (5.7), UK (5.1), France (5.0) and Germany (4.0). Large Canadian businesses with more than $700M in annual turnover report more frequent payment disruptions than smaller operators, increasing their exposure to the financial impact of outages.

The research draws on two nationally representative surveys, covering 2,000 Canadian consumers and 200 retail and hospitality managers, and examine the frequency, duration and commercial impact of payment disruptions.

"Payment disruption is a direct hit to the consumer and to businesses, and the longer it lasts, the more impact snowballs with missed sales and compounding recovery costs," said Christopher Kronenthal, President at FreedomPay. "Canadian businesses must adopt strategies to avoid and withstand disruption, including layered backup solutions and holistic payment ecosystems."

With customer trust and authenticity more important than ever, payment system outages also expose businesses to cascading vulnerabilities, potentially impacting long-term performance.

The report also examines how consumers behave when payment systems fail. It finds that almost two-thirds (63%) of "High-Risk Critics" (affluent, frequent shoppers) and more than one-third (38%) of "Silent Walkouts" (those who abandon without complaint) say a single payment failure reduces their trust in a business. This directly impacts long-term customer loyalty and return visits. The reputational risk can extend further online, with more than half (60%) of Gen Z saying they would likely share a negative experience on social media.

"When payments fail, customers don't just lose time, they lose confidence. A truly integrated payment resilience strategy, capable of anticipating, absorbing and recovering from outages, is no longer an option. It's the critical investment businesses need to make now to protect their transactions and reputation," said David Jones, VP of NORAM Solution Engineering at Dynatrace.

The urgency for Canadian businesses to invest in robust payment resilience is underscored by data showing that restoring payment systems within the first five minutes can prevent over 90% of potential losses. This highlights the critical need for rapid recovery capabilities.

Despite these alarming risks, many Canadian businesses are far from ready. The report states that one in three retail and hospitality businesses (32%) operates without any secure digital payment backup. Among those with some safeguards, investments are fragmented with only 44% using secondary internet connections, 40% offering offline card processing, and 29% that provide mobile payment alternatives. This disjointed approach leaves companies highly vulnerable to financial and reputational fallout.

"To effectively combat these vulnerabilities, businesses need to adopt solutions such as secondary internet for network resilience, offline card processing, and mobile payment alternatives. An integrated approach including robust POS reliability and guaranteed power continuity will enable businesses to secure financial stability and customer trust," said Richard Lim, CEO at Retail Economics.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

Payment System Failures Put Canadian Businesses at Financial and Reputational Risk

Payment disruption is placing growing pressure on Canadian businesses. An estimated $7.6 billion in retail and hospitality sales is at risk each year due to payment system failures. 

A new collaborative report by FreedomPay, Dynatrace and Retail Economics reveals Canadians will wait just six minutes during a service outage before abandoning a purchase. However, the average outage lasts 67 minutes, leaving businesses susceptible to significant financial losses and potential damage to consumer trust and loyalty.

Canada is particularly vulnerable to payment disruptions, with businesses reporting almost seven (6.8) outages per year, a higher frequency than peers in the US (5.7), UK (5.1), France (5.0) and Germany (4.0). Large Canadian businesses with more than $700M in annual turnover report more frequent payment disruptions than smaller operators, increasing their exposure to the financial impact of outages.

The research draws on two nationally representative surveys, covering 2,000 Canadian consumers and 200 retail and hospitality managers, and examine the frequency, duration and commercial impact of payment disruptions.

"Payment disruption is a direct hit to the consumer and to businesses, and the longer it lasts, the more impact snowballs with missed sales and compounding recovery costs," said Christopher Kronenthal, President at FreedomPay. "Canadian businesses must adopt strategies to avoid and withstand disruption, including layered backup solutions and holistic payment ecosystems."

With customer trust and authenticity more important than ever, payment system outages also expose businesses to cascading vulnerabilities, potentially impacting long-term performance.

The report also examines how consumers behave when payment systems fail. It finds that almost two-thirds (63%) of "High-Risk Critics" (affluent, frequent shoppers) and more than one-third (38%) of "Silent Walkouts" (those who abandon without complaint) say a single payment failure reduces their trust in a business. This directly impacts long-term customer loyalty and return visits. The reputational risk can extend further online, with more than half (60%) of Gen Z saying they would likely share a negative experience on social media.

"When payments fail, customers don't just lose time, they lose confidence. A truly integrated payment resilience strategy, capable of anticipating, absorbing and recovering from outages, is no longer an option. It's the critical investment businesses need to make now to protect their transactions and reputation," said David Jones, VP of NORAM Solution Engineering at Dynatrace.

The urgency for Canadian businesses to invest in robust payment resilience is underscored by data showing that restoring payment systems within the first five minutes can prevent over 90% of potential losses. This highlights the critical need for rapid recovery capabilities.

Despite these alarming risks, many Canadian businesses are far from ready. The report states that one in three retail and hospitality businesses (32%) operates without any secure digital payment backup. Among those with some safeguards, investments are fragmented with only 44% using secondary internet connections, 40% offering offline card processing, and 29% that provide mobile payment alternatives. This disjointed approach leaves companies highly vulnerable to financial and reputational fallout.

"To effectively combat these vulnerabilities, businesses need to adopt solutions such as secondary internet for network resilience, offline card processing, and mobile payment alternatives. An integrated approach including robust POS reliability and guaranteed power continuity will enable businesses to secure financial stability and customer trust," said Richard Lim, CEO at Retail Economics.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...