Rootly is taking another step forward in its AI-first approach by making its API AI-Agent-First.
Rootly has implemented the Agents JSON standard, ensuring that LLM agents can interact with its API to the full extent, including complex requests that agents could not perform natively. This enables Rootly customers to perform more intelligent and autonomous incident management via their AI-powered automation tools and co-pilots. This comes in complement of exposing OpenAPI Specification (OAS) that defines a standard, language-agnostic interface to its HTTP APIs.
"The way companies interact with APIs is shifting," said JJ Tang, CEO at Rootly. "Instead of traditional software making API calls, LLM agents are now handling these interactions. Making our API agent-friendly ensures our customers can embrace this shift, integrating Rootly into their AI-driven workflows."
This advancement aligns with Rootly’s commitment to AX, unlocking new possibilities for incident responders and platform administrators.
For incident practitioners, this means AI agents can now gather, filter, and organize Rootly data across the entire platform—enabling deeper insights and faster decision-making. Teams can dynamically interact with data incidents, leveraging multifaceted AI-driven analysis to improve reliability and response strategies.
For platform administrators, configuring incident management automation workflows, policies, and settings becomes more intuitive with an AI-powered assistant. Rather than navigating complex interfaces, admins can rely on an AI agent to streamline setup, suggest optimized workflows, and provide guidance on system configurations—all through a natural, conversational interface.
The Latest
AI observability serves several roles across an organization. AI engineers use it to build, evaluate, and improve AI systems. SREs use it to operate those systems reliably and efficiently in production, including managing their cost. Leaders need it to connect AI behavior and operational performance to business outcomes. The common need is a clear understanding of whether AI systems are delivering the intended result ...
Part 4 outlines the challenges enterprise face when adopting AI observability. The main challenge is that AI complexity compounds at every stage of maturity. LLM-based applications introduce new behavior, dependencies, and quality considerations, while Agentic AI adds further failure modes as systems make decisions and take actions ...
Part 3 reports on the current state of AI observability. Most experts agree: enterprises are moving faster with AI than they are with the operational discipline needed to run it safely ...
When discussing AI Observability, one of the first questions that arises: Is this just an extension of traditional observability or is this a whole new type of tool? Part 2 compares traditional observability with AI observability ...
In this extensive 14-part series that will post over the next three weeks, experts across observability and AI will provide insight and opinions on the need for AI Observability, the challenges, the benefits, the current state, and predictions for the future ...
Amid rising complexity, organizations are moving quickly toward agent-driven operations: AgenticOps, according to The Impact of Agentic AI on Network Operations, a new report from Cisco ...
AI, automation, and enterprise software give organizations an extraordinary amount of leverage. Work that once required hours can happen in minutes. Information buried across systems can be analyzed almost instantly. Complex workflows can be coordinated across teams with far less manual intervention. That leverage creates a temptation to start with the technology ...
Everyone wants to talk about models. Compute clusters. Benchmark scores that climb a fraction of a point and make headlines anyway. It's an easy conversation to have because it's measurable. But it's also increasingly beside the point ...
For more than a decade, the default infrastructure play has been simple. Move more workloads to the cloud, retire on-premises gear and treat the data center as a cost to shrink. That logic held while public cloud offered near-limitless capacity at predictable prices, and AI demand is now testing both halves of that assumption ...
Most enterprise IT leaders can tell you exactly how many applications are running across their organization. They can surface a dashboard showing telecom spend by region, pull a report on SaaS license utilization, or call up a real-time view of mobile device inventory. The data is there, and IT leaders have largely delivered on the promise of visibility. Yet, in most organizations, that visibility has not translated into business value ...