
ScienceLogic released a new version of its IT monitoring software.
The software is designed to solve the age-old challenge of automatically discovering and visually mapping the connections and interdependencies of technologies across different IT silos and clouds. The solution enables organizations to use this information to dramatically reduce IT complexity and solve problems faster than ever before. With the world generating more data this year than the past 5,000 years combined, technology moving at the speed of light, and IT complexity growing at an exponential rate, reducing IT complexity has become a fundamental need for an organization’s survival.
With this software release, ScienceLogic’s CloudMapper technology can visually map relationships, measure, and monitor cross-technology stacks without human intervention. You can now visually see the relationship and dependencies of VMs to storage, to network, to applications, and more, across multiple hybrid clouds. This visual understanding helps IT professionals see anomalies before they cause an impact.
Key Hybrid IT Management capabilities delivered in this release include:
- Dynamic Visuals: Visually shows IT resources across multiple clouds, regardless if they are on-prem, off-prem, or both. Automatically adjusts visual maps to changed relationships so reported interdependencies are always accurate and complete
- Real-Time Monitoring: Monitors and proactively detects anomalies across technologies and clouds in real-time
- Intelligent Relationships & Bursting: Shows the relationships between complex technologies—for example, an on-prem server that uses storage in the public cloud—and allows for intelligent bursting of compute, storage, and networking resources on- and off-prem based on business need
- Fast Problem Resolution: Multi-level views and dashboards provide the ability to diagnose and resolve problems fast with drill down from a single alert to a visual interdependency map, to technology, to resource, to performance and health of that resource, all the way to the specific metric highlighting the underlying problem, within seconds
The Latest
Ask most IT leaders about their biggest concern with AI and you'll hear the same answer: hallucinations ... Today, however, the conversation has shifted ... As organizations move beyond chatbots and experiments, they are increasingly deploying AI agents that perform multi-step tasks. These systems retrieve documents, query databases, call APIs, generate reports, write code, and make recommendations. The issue is not whether the model can reason. The issue is whether the organization can see, verify, and govern the decisions being made along the way ...
While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...
For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...
As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...
The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...
The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...
Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...
Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...
Top-performing businesses prioritize data-driven decision making, enabling leaders to move from intuition and gut feel towards evidence-based judgment. But that judgment is only sound when the data underpinning decisions is accurate. With incident management, data accuracy is particularly important. Long-term revenue, customer trust, and operational stability depend on high-quality data that enables teams to quickly identify and address the root cause of major incidents. Against this backdrop, governance becomes a critical endeavor to ensure the right data drives the right action ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 26, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network compliance ...