Skip to main content

Support Centers Need to Justify Their Existence - or Perish

The Enterprise IT support center has become a feature of almost every enterprise, but it is becoming commoditized and may be displaced by external service providers unless it can justify its existence.

That's the takeaway from a report of 205 North American technical service and support professionals, entitled Show Me The Value: Support's Mandate conducted by HDI and sponsored by CA Technologies.

The technical service and support industry keeps hearing the same thing — that they need to show their business value, but for most internal support centers, there's a conundrum. Too often, support is simply considered to be a cost center, and it has a difficult time justifying requests for additional resources and budget. It may be even considered a target for elimination.

The good news is that a number of support centers are working to demonstrate their value, and better support emerging technologies and new ways of doing business.

As the report points out, support centers are adjusting roles, increasing customer focus, and changing their metrics. But the question remains as to whether they are really in sync with the strategic vision of non-IT executives in their organizations. And if they're not, they may be viewed as a service that adds little-to-no value and is subsequently considered an irrelevant and unnecessary burden.

To deliver relevance and value, today's support centers transition from being reactive to proactively focusing on servicing the business. When support centers are viewed positively by the larger organization and are able to expand and improve the services they offer, their business value increases.

The support center fundamentally needs to understand the business strategy and how it translates into the end-to-end business process and its impact on the customer. For example, support centers need to demonstrate how their phone, email, chat and even person-to-person interactions are helping the business achieve its strategic goals.

Metrics need to be expressed in terms of increased productivity, effective and quality delivery of the business services and accelerating innovation. In reality, support centers must transition to proactive delivery and continuity of service rather than just fixing random problems as they occur, in the order that they occur.

For many organizations, the success and even survival of the support center depends on the ability to demonstrate business value in three key areas — people, process and technology — in terms of the metrics that quantify them.

In order to transition, metrics must transition. Alarmingly, 54 percent of respondents in the survey have not changed their metrics to better measure business value. Forty percent have added metrics, while 12 percent have subtracted metrics that did not show business value.

Some change is occurring with job titles and roles transitioning in forward thinking support organizations. Forty percent of support centers have added new job roles to address changes in their relationship with the business — including director of customer relations and service desk director — based on established ITSM frameworks, especially ITIL.

Just like in our personal lives where our communication is transitioning with Facebook, Twitter, Chat, Video calling, etc., support centers are looking to leverage these capabilities. More than two-thirds of respondents have purchased fully-featured ITSM tools and other solutions in areas such as social collaboration and analytics and reporting to address their changing relationship with the business, or plan to do so within the next year, according to the report.

To succeed, support centers can no longer wait for the phone to ring. They need to put in place processes and enable users to be a self-sufficient as possible to proactively preempt calls to the service desk.

They can also push for automation that correlates events and points to potential issues before they occur. And they need to report to the business on metrics that point to the business value derived from the Support Center.

ABOUT Robert Stroud

Robert Stroud is Vice President Strategy & Innovation, IT Business Management, CA Technologies.

Image removed.

Related Links:

www.ca.com

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Support Centers Need to Justify Their Existence - or Perish

The Enterprise IT support center has become a feature of almost every enterprise, but it is becoming commoditized and may be displaced by external service providers unless it can justify its existence.

That's the takeaway from a report of 205 North American technical service and support professionals, entitled Show Me The Value: Support's Mandate conducted by HDI and sponsored by CA Technologies.

The technical service and support industry keeps hearing the same thing — that they need to show their business value, but for most internal support centers, there's a conundrum. Too often, support is simply considered to be a cost center, and it has a difficult time justifying requests for additional resources and budget. It may be even considered a target for elimination.

The good news is that a number of support centers are working to demonstrate their value, and better support emerging technologies and new ways of doing business.

As the report points out, support centers are adjusting roles, increasing customer focus, and changing their metrics. But the question remains as to whether they are really in sync with the strategic vision of non-IT executives in their organizations. And if they're not, they may be viewed as a service that adds little-to-no value and is subsequently considered an irrelevant and unnecessary burden.

To deliver relevance and value, today's support centers transition from being reactive to proactively focusing on servicing the business. When support centers are viewed positively by the larger organization and are able to expand and improve the services they offer, their business value increases.

The support center fundamentally needs to understand the business strategy and how it translates into the end-to-end business process and its impact on the customer. For example, support centers need to demonstrate how their phone, email, chat and even person-to-person interactions are helping the business achieve its strategic goals.

Metrics need to be expressed in terms of increased productivity, effective and quality delivery of the business services and accelerating innovation. In reality, support centers must transition to proactive delivery and continuity of service rather than just fixing random problems as they occur, in the order that they occur.

For many organizations, the success and even survival of the support center depends on the ability to demonstrate business value in three key areas — people, process and technology — in terms of the metrics that quantify them.

In order to transition, metrics must transition. Alarmingly, 54 percent of respondents in the survey have not changed their metrics to better measure business value. Forty percent have added metrics, while 12 percent have subtracted metrics that did not show business value.

Some change is occurring with job titles and roles transitioning in forward thinking support organizations. Forty percent of support centers have added new job roles to address changes in their relationship with the business — including director of customer relations and service desk director — based on established ITSM frameworks, especially ITIL.

Just like in our personal lives where our communication is transitioning with Facebook, Twitter, Chat, Video calling, etc., support centers are looking to leverage these capabilities. More than two-thirds of respondents have purchased fully-featured ITSM tools and other solutions in areas such as social collaboration and analytics and reporting to address their changing relationship with the business, or plan to do so within the next year, according to the report.

To succeed, support centers can no longer wait for the phone to ring. They need to put in place processes and enable users to be a self-sufficient as possible to proactively preempt calls to the service desk.

They can also push for automation that correlates events and points to potential issues before they occur. And they need to report to the business on metrics that point to the business value derived from the Support Center.

ABOUT Robert Stroud

Robert Stroud is Vice President Strategy & Innovation, IT Business Management, CA Technologies.

Image removed.

Related Links:

www.ca.com

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.