The US is behind other nations when it comes to encouraging and rewarding IT innovation, according to a CA Technologies survey.
The global study Why IT Needs to Lead Now: The Innovation Imperative demonstrates the urgent need for many IT organizations to transition from an ad hoc approach to innovation to a more mature, structured method to deliver higher-quality business services faster.
According to the large organizations surveyed, only 28 percent of US respondents said innovation is frequently or widely practiced, compared to 58 percent of European and 45 percent of Asian respondents.
And while 63 percent of worldwide respondents have formal processes to measure innovation success, it is largely ad hoc or nonexistent in the US, with 26 percent of US respondents reporting there is no measurement process in place.
US-based organizations are also facing different obstacles than their international counterparts. When asked about key obstacles to innovation, the US is significantly more likely to cite budget issues (47 percent versus 28 percent in Europe, and 24 percent in Asia Pacific (AP)); information overload/too entrenched in repetitive tasks (43 percent versus 29 percent in Europe and 18 percent in AP); and, lack of an incentive/rewards structure (26 percent versus 19 percent in Europe and AP).
More budget dollars are also spent on maintenance and “keeping the lights on” in the US compared to overseas respondents (73 percent of US versus 63 percent for Europe and 61 percent for AP), limiting the available budget dollars for new projects.
Additionally, US organizations embrace and leverage “technology disruption” far less frequently than their counterparts. Only 17 percent of US respondents indicated that technology disruption projects frequently occur, versus 30 percent and 38 percent for their European and Asian counterparts, respectively.
“In addition to these troubling gaps, the research also tells us that innovation is a critical driver to success given today’s economic pressures, 24x7 connectivity, global market access, lower barriers to entry for competitors, and new expectations from tech-savvy consumers, all of which create unprecedented demands on today’s IT leaders,” said Andi Mann, vice president, Strategic Solutions at CA Technologies.
“Not prioritizing, fostering and rewarding innovation can have dire consequences. It makes organizations less competitive, unable to attract new customers and therefore, less relevant in the market, and it hurts the bottom line.”
Mann continued, “By responding to this ‘Innovation Imperative,’ IT leaders can deliver new business services faster and more efficiently. They are in prime position to lead innovation efforts in their organizations by exploiting the convergence of disruptive technologies such as social, mobile, cloud, virtualization and big data to support their business-centric strategies with innovative services or solutions.”
Additional key findings include:
• When asked about the possible outcomes related to a lack of investment in innovation, the top responses across business and IT included an inability to attract new customers/markets (37 percent), increased competitive pressure (32 percent) and revenue loss (31 percent).
• Looking at outcomes they have achieved or expect to achieve from innovation, the majority of respondents cited higher customer satisfaction (86 percent) and increased speed to market (79 percent). Other benefits include the ability to enter new markets (82 percent), increased profit (85 percent) and revenue/market share (83 percent), and the identification of growth opportunities (81 percent).
• Innovative organizations are more likely than their less innovative peers to emphasize experimentation and exploration; however, they place even more emphasis on meeting or anticipating customer needs, analysis and exploiting existing knowledge. Counter to conventional thinking, they also place more emphasis on planning and structure, indicating that they take a more mature approach to how innovation projects are managed and measured.
• Areas of planned technology investment related to innovation over the next 12 months include mobile, cloud, security, business analytics, service management, virtualization and automation.
The Latest
Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ...
Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...
Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...
Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...
The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...
The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...
In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...
AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.
The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...