Skip to main content

Using AI to Drive Automation

Michael Procopio

Automation has been around since the first server admin wrote a script. Since then, IT life has continually become more complex — multiple data centers, high availability, disaster recovery, and now the cloud all create a dynamically ever-changing hybrid IT estate.

Over the last few decades, IT departments have decreased budgets in part because of recession. As a result, they have are being asked to do more with less. The increase in work has amplified the need for automation.

IT Process Automation

IT process automation can be used from simple individual scripts to branching scripts to full-blown orchestration systems. In addition to commercial offerings, the open-source community has developed over a dozen projects.

Until recently, all automation required human activation to kick off a process. Operations teams would manually go through the data they received. Once the problem was found, which could take days to fix and war room assemblies, a fix could then be implemented manually, with a script, or an automation tool. As compliance became more important, using tools that could log the actions to implement a fix became more important, but we still have humans working the automation.

Runbooks started as paper instructions on what to do when a well-known problem occurred. More recently, runbooks are automated scripts or orchestration systems. This documentation and automation helps move problem resolution to less experienced operators, sometimes called shift-left.

AIOps

AI has recently become a reality for IT operations and can find problems then activate the appropriate automation to fix the problem. The original AIOps definition was focused on applying machine learning to the vast amount of data that IT operations was getting from all the monitoring tools it has. According to Enterprise Management Associates (EMA), enterprises have more than 10 monitoring tools managing hundred thousand metrics per day — not including log files.

This amount of data is too much for any human, even a group of humans to process. Hence, the application of machine learning which can process all this information in minutes or hours and point to the most likely root cause or at least narrow to a small number. Succinctly, AIOps turns IT operations data in operational insights to pinpoint the root cause of a problem.

Automated AIOps

Most recently, the definition of AIOps evolved to include automation. The idea is that once the machine learning determines the problem as described above, it kicks off the automation tools to fix the problem.

A recent survey determined about half the responding organizations allowed for fully automated problem resolution — no human involved. The other half wanted human review before acting, but even this is preferable to having the human take the time to decide which automation flow is required. This is a significant change from five years ago when most organizations were very nervous about automated remediation.

Getting to Automated AIOps

How do you get from where your current IT operations reality to automated AIOps? As the title implies, there are two parts - automation and AI. The below table shows the maturity curve from the automation perspective.


At the end of the day, the goal of the AI part is to take in data and automatically determine the problem. Some problems do not require machine learning to find, but the system must be able to take in data and isolate the problem. Once you have AI identifying a problem, you can connect it to the automated runbook that will remediate it. Then, from the Ops side, start by picking a single-use case, for example, "optimize event management" and then work with your teams to identify problems they see repeatedly. Voila — you have now automated AIOps.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Using AI to Drive Automation

Michael Procopio

Automation has been around since the first server admin wrote a script. Since then, IT life has continually become more complex — multiple data centers, high availability, disaster recovery, and now the cloud all create a dynamically ever-changing hybrid IT estate.

Over the last few decades, IT departments have decreased budgets in part because of recession. As a result, they have are being asked to do more with less. The increase in work has amplified the need for automation.

IT Process Automation

IT process automation can be used from simple individual scripts to branching scripts to full-blown orchestration systems. In addition to commercial offerings, the open-source community has developed over a dozen projects.

Until recently, all automation required human activation to kick off a process. Operations teams would manually go through the data they received. Once the problem was found, which could take days to fix and war room assemblies, a fix could then be implemented manually, with a script, or an automation tool. As compliance became more important, using tools that could log the actions to implement a fix became more important, but we still have humans working the automation.

Runbooks started as paper instructions on what to do when a well-known problem occurred. More recently, runbooks are automated scripts or orchestration systems. This documentation and automation helps move problem resolution to less experienced operators, sometimes called shift-left.

AIOps

AI has recently become a reality for IT operations and can find problems then activate the appropriate automation to fix the problem. The original AIOps definition was focused on applying machine learning to the vast amount of data that IT operations was getting from all the monitoring tools it has. According to Enterprise Management Associates (EMA), enterprises have more than 10 monitoring tools managing hundred thousand metrics per day — not including log files.

This amount of data is too much for any human, even a group of humans to process. Hence, the application of machine learning which can process all this information in minutes or hours and point to the most likely root cause or at least narrow to a small number. Succinctly, AIOps turns IT operations data in operational insights to pinpoint the root cause of a problem.

Automated AIOps

Most recently, the definition of AIOps evolved to include automation. The idea is that once the machine learning determines the problem as described above, it kicks off the automation tools to fix the problem.

A recent survey determined about half the responding organizations allowed for fully automated problem resolution — no human involved. The other half wanted human review before acting, but even this is preferable to having the human take the time to decide which automation flow is required. This is a significant change from five years ago when most organizations were very nervous about automated remediation.

Getting to Automated AIOps

How do you get from where your current IT operations reality to automated AIOps? As the title implies, there are two parts - automation and AI. The below table shows the maturity curve from the automation perspective.


At the end of the day, the goal of the AI part is to take in data and automatically determine the problem. Some problems do not require machine learning to find, but the system must be able to take in data and isolate the problem. Once you have AI identifying a problem, you can connect it to the automated runbook that will remediate it. Then, from the Ops side, start by picking a single-use case, for example, "optimize event management" and then work with your teams to identify problems they see repeatedly. Voila — you have now automated AIOps.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...