Skip to main content

What's Blocking Scalable AI?

Brad Rumph
Tines

For all the attention AI receives in corporate slide decks and strategic roadmaps, many businesses are struggling to translate that ambition into something that holds up at scale.

At least, that's the picture that emerged from a recent Forrester study commissioned by Tines. We asked more than 400 IT leaders from North America and Europe to share how their teams were thinking about AI and automation and what they felt was holding them back.

One idea that came up again and again was that progress often breaks down at the seams, where deployments in one part of the business don't carry over to others due to either missing or misaligned support structures. According to our findings, almost half (49%) of businesses lack a clear orchestration strategy, with most agreeing that this was making AI difficult to adopt and scale.

When we discuss orchestration, we usually mean how separate but often interconnected teams, tools, or business processes work together to enable more complex operations. Instead of adding new tools, orchestration links the existing ones your teams already use, serving as the execution layer that makes AI effective and scalable.

For this study, we wanted to understand how enterprises viewed orchestration as a leadership and coordination function, rather than just a technical exercise.

Where Orchestration Should Sit

Something that really struck us was the disconnect between where business orchestration should sit and how those efforts are seen. When asked whether they felt IT was best positioned to coordinate AI across workflows, systems and teams, 86% of respondents agreed. Further, 38% of respondents said IT should own and lead orchestration, and over a quarter saw IT playing a role either as a coordination hub between business functions or as an enabler of AI initiatives.

Yet, an equal share (38%) says those contributions are overlooked at the executive level.

A Snapshot of Fragmentation

That ambiguity shows up in other areas, too. Nearly half (49%) of IT leaders surveyed told us that conflicting objectives across IT, business, and data functions were the biggest obstacle to scaling AI efforts. Misaligned budgets, technical tooling and disconnected platforms (43%) compound these silos, making it even harder to scale AI solutions beyond isolated pilots.

In this kind of environment, it's not surprising that over half of IT leaders have made compliance and governance the foundation of their AI efforts — ahead of aspects like enhancing employee experience (44%), cutting IT costs (42%), or speeding up delivery (34%).

This is a logical response to the risks that come with fragmented AI adoption. But governance depends on orchestration to function at scale. Without it, workflows stay siloed and the connective tissue needed to apply governance consistently just isn't there.

How Orchestration Builds Confidence in AI

This brings us to another challenge: trust. 40% of IT leaders told us that employees didn't fully trust the outputs generated by AI tools.

It's a telling figure that reflects the on-the-ground reality of AI adoption. If people don't understand how AI is governed or how its outputs influence decision-making, they're unlikely to trust it, regardless of how powerful or sophisticated the model is.

Encouragingly, leaders increasingly recognize this problem. 73% of respondents said end-to-end transparency across AI workflows was essential to building confidence in AI outputs.

Orchestration supports this visibility by providing a clearer view of how decisions made in one part of the business affect outcomes in another, while at the same time aligning teams around shared tools and processes. That kind of transparency builds trust, not just by making AI activity legible across the organization, but by ensuring that everyone can see how their work contributes to wider business outcomes. More than a third (35%) of IT leaders told us aligning AI initiatives with enterprise strategy was a key priority, further underscoring the need to bring sense and structure to organizational roadmaps.

None of this is about slowing down innovation. In fact, our study showed that where orchestration is working, it's unlocking greater collaboration between teams and faster progress towards business goals.

From where I sit, orchestration is one of the clearest ways to turn AI ambition into real operational value. If IT has the mandate and the tools to lead, organizations stand a much better chance of scaling AI into something that delivers real business value — safely and sustainably.

Brad Rumph is Field CTO at Tines

Hot Topics

The Latest

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

What's Blocking Scalable AI?

Brad Rumph
Tines

For all the attention AI receives in corporate slide decks and strategic roadmaps, many businesses are struggling to translate that ambition into something that holds up at scale.

At least, that's the picture that emerged from a recent Forrester study commissioned by Tines. We asked more than 400 IT leaders from North America and Europe to share how their teams were thinking about AI and automation and what they felt was holding them back.

One idea that came up again and again was that progress often breaks down at the seams, where deployments in one part of the business don't carry over to others due to either missing or misaligned support structures. According to our findings, almost half (49%) of businesses lack a clear orchestration strategy, with most agreeing that this was making AI difficult to adopt and scale.

When we discuss orchestration, we usually mean how separate but often interconnected teams, tools, or business processes work together to enable more complex operations. Instead of adding new tools, orchestration links the existing ones your teams already use, serving as the execution layer that makes AI effective and scalable.

For this study, we wanted to understand how enterprises viewed orchestration as a leadership and coordination function, rather than just a technical exercise.

Where Orchestration Should Sit

Something that really struck us was the disconnect between where business orchestration should sit and how those efforts are seen. When asked whether they felt IT was best positioned to coordinate AI across workflows, systems and teams, 86% of respondents agreed. Further, 38% of respondents said IT should own and lead orchestration, and over a quarter saw IT playing a role either as a coordination hub between business functions or as an enabler of AI initiatives.

Yet, an equal share (38%) says those contributions are overlooked at the executive level.

A Snapshot of Fragmentation

That ambiguity shows up in other areas, too. Nearly half (49%) of IT leaders surveyed told us that conflicting objectives across IT, business, and data functions were the biggest obstacle to scaling AI efforts. Misaligned budgets, technical tooling and disconnected platforms (43%) compound these silos, making it even harder to scale AI solutions beyond isolated pilots.

In this kind of environment, it's not surprising that over half of IT leaders have made compliance and governance the foundation of their AI efforts — ahead of aspects like enhancing employee experience (44%), cutting IT costs (42%), or speeding up delivery (34%).

This is a logical response to the risks that come with fragmented AI adoption. But governance depends on orchestration to function at scale. Without it, workflows stay siloed and the connective tissue needed to apply governance consistently just isn't there.

How Orchestration Builds Confidence in AI

This brings us to another challenge: trust. 40% of IT leaders told us that employees didn't fully trust the outputs generated by AI tools.

It's a telling figure that reflects the on-the-ground reality of AI adoption. If people don't understand how AI is governed or how its outputs influence decision-making, they're unlikely to trust it, regardless of how powerful or sophisticated the model is.

Encouragingly, leaders increasingly recognize this problem. 73% of respondents said end-to-end transparency across AI workflows was essential to building confidence in AI outputs.

Orchestration supports this visibility by providing a clearer view of how decisions made in one part of the business affect outcomes in another, while at the same time aligning teams around shared tools and processes. That kind of transparency builds trust, not just by making AI activity legible across the organization, but by ensuring that everyone can see how their work contributes to wider business outcomes. More than a third (35%) of IT leaders told us aligning AI initiatives with enterprise strategy was a key priority, further underscoring the need to bring sense and structure to organizational roadmaps.

None of this is about slowing down innovation. In fact, our study showed that where orchestration is working, it's unlocking greater collaboration between teams and faster progress towards business goals.

From where I sit, orchestration is one of the clearest ways to turn AI ambition into real operational value. If IT has the mandate and the tools to lead, organizations stand a much better chance of scaling AI into something that delivers real business value — safely and sustainably.

Brad Rumph is Field CTO at Tines

Hot Topics

The Latest

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...