Skip to main content

Is Your Network Ready for the AI Boom? 5 Overlooked Stress Points

Prakash Mana
Cloudbrink

Artificial intelligence is no longer a future investment. It's already embedded in how we work — whether through copilots in productivity apps, real-time transcription tools in meetings, or machine learning models fueling analytics and personalization.

But while enterprise adoption accelerates, there's one critical area many leaders have yet to examine: Can your network actually support AI at the speed your users expect?

The focus so far has been on AI itself:

Which tools are we rolling out?

What use cases make the most sense?

How do we stay compliant and competitive?

These are important questions. But they often overlook the layer that determines whether AI feels seamless or frustrating: the delivery infrastructure.

Even the most advanced AI models won't create value if users experience them as laggy, glitchy, or unreliable. That gap between capability and experience is often a result of hidden performance stress points.

Here are five of the most commonly overlooked.

1. Latency-Sensitive Workflows Are Now Everywhere

AI is no longer confined to backend systems. It's becoming part of the moment-to-moment workflow across departments:

  • Sales reps rely on real-time call insights.
  • Engineers use AI code suggestions as they type.
  • Customer service teams leverage smart summaries between chats.

These are latency-sensitive interactions. A delay of even half a second can interrupt flow, create doubt, or lead users to skip the tool altogether.

Yet many enterprises still route traffic through centralized VPNs or legacy access infrastructure, introducing latency at the exact moment responsiveness matters most.

The shift to real-time AI interaction demands a corresponding shift in how we think about performance. Not just speed, but consistency under pressure.

2. Packet Loss Disrupts More Than Connectivity

In traditional office networks accessing local resources, mild packet loss may go unnoticed. But with AI in the loop using SaaS and GPUaaS resources, especially for live transcription, computer vision, or voice processing, packet loss directly affects the output.

Poor quality audio on a video call doesn't just inconvenience the listener, it degrades the accuracy of any AI assistant trying to capture notes or summarize outcomes.

When inference requests are repeatedly delayed, corrupted, or incomplete, it creates a feedback loop of degraded performance that users (rightly) blame on the tool.

In reality, it's the delivery path, not the AI engine, that's failing.

3. The Last Mile Is Now Mission-Critical

Pre-pandemic, the last mile — how data gets from your environment to the end user — was often treated as a best-effort concern. Today, it's a critical variable in application success.

As AI moves closer to the user powering in-app suggestions, decision support, and real-time collaboration, variability in home networks, ISP performance, or even Wi-Fi strength becomes a key limiter.

The user experience is shaped by the weakest link, and in remote or hybrid environments, that's often the last mile. When that link fails, the AI tool appears to "not work," even if the backend is performing flawlessly.

What's more concerning is that these issues often don't trigger traditional alerts. But they silently affect usage, engagement, and ROI.

4. AI Traffic Patterns Don't Follow the Old Rules

One of the more subtle shifts AI introduces is in how and when data flows through the network.
Unlike predictable, transactional workflows, AI activity tends to be:

  • Spiky – sudden bursts of demand from large language models
  • Context-heavy – requiring multiple data sources to converge in real time
  • Edge-driven – activated from a variety of user devices and locations

Legacy capacity planning models based on average load or scheduled usage fail to capture the dynamic, real-time nature of AI access.

And when network teams can't anticipate these patterns, they can't design for them. That's when performance dips, buffering starts, and adoption stalls.

5. Access Security Layers Can Create Bottlenecks

There's no question that Zero Trust and layered security must be foundational in the AI era. But not all access solutions are built with AI workloads in mind.

When every request from an AI assistant is routed through multiple hops like VPN concentrators, ping ponged through ZTNA PoPs, inspection firewalls, or authentication gateways, latency builds. In the process, the responsiveness that defines great AI is lost.

This is especially true when the AI tool needs to pull in context across apps — emails, documents, calendars, CRM data. If that access is fragmented or slow, the assistant feels broken, even if it's secure.

Security shouldn't come at the cost of usability. But in many environments, it still does.

What IT Leaders Should Be Doing Now

The organizations that will succeed with AI aren't just those that build smart models or write good prompts. They're the ones that deliver AI to their people in a way that feels effortless, intuitive, and immediate.

Here's where to start:

  • Run a performance readiness check: Treat AI rollouts like any other critical system launch. Map dependencies, latency paths, and weak points.
  • Move beyond uptime as the main metric: AI interaction demands a shift from uptime to real-time. Are your tools responding fast enough to feel natural?
  • Reevaluate access architecture: Look for bottlenecks in legacy VPNs, ZTNA, proxies, or legacy routing setups that could delay cloud-native AI access.
  • Bring network and application teams together: AI success isn't just an app or infrastructure issue, it's a systems issue. Solve it collaboratively.

Conclusion

Enterprise AI isn't just a technology initiative, it's a performance challenge. The next phase of digital work won't be defined by who has the smartest tools, but by who can deliver them at the speed users expect with no friction, no lag, and no excuses.

That's why infrastructure decisions today carry outsized weight. Because delivering a powerful AI experience isn't about pushing more to the cloud. It's about bringing performance to the edge where work happens.

Cloudbrink is helping organizations solve the delivery layer ensuring secure, ultra-low-latency access for the future of intelligent work.

Prakash Mana is CEO of Cloudbrink

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Is Your Network Ready for the AI Boom? 5 Overlooked Stress Points

Prakash Mana
Cloudbrink

Artificial intelligence is no longer a future investment. It's already embedded in how we work — whether through copilots in productivity apps, real-time transcription tools in meetings, or machine learning models fueling analytics and personalization.

But while enterprise adoption accelerates, there's one critical area many leaders have yet to examine: Can your network actually support AI at the speed your users expect?

The focus so far has been on AI itself:

Which tools are we rolling out?

What use cases make the most sense?

How do we stay compliant and competitive?

These are important questions. But they often overlook the layer that determines whether AI feels seamless or frustrating: the delivery infrastructure.

Even the most advanced AI models won't create value if users experience them as laggy, glitchy, or unreliable. That gap between capability and experience is often a result of hidden performance stress points.

Here are five of the most commonly overlooked.

1. Latency-Sensitive Workflows Are Now Everywhere

AI is no longer confined to backend systems. It's becoming part of the moment-to-moment workflow across departments:

  • Sales reps rely on real-time call insights.
  • Engineers use AI code suggestions as they type.
  • Customer service teams leverage smart summaries between chats.

These are latency-sensitive interactions. A delay of even half a second can interrupt flow, create doubt, or lead users to skip the tool altogether.

Yet many enterprises still route traffic through centralized VPNs or legacy access infrastructure, introducing latency at the exact moment responsiveness matters most.

The shift to real-time AI interaction demands a corresponding shift in how we think about performance. Not just speed, but consistency under pressure.

2. Packet Loss Disrupts More Than Connectivity

In traditional office networks accessing local resources, mild packet loss may go unnoticed. But with AI in the loop using SaaS and GPUaaS resources, especially for live transcription, computer vision, or voice processing, packet loss directly affects the output.

Poor quality audio on a video call doesn't just inconvenience the listener, it degrades the accuracy of any AI assistant trying to capture notes or summarize outcomes.

When inference requests are repeatedly delayed, corrupted, or incomplete, it creates a feedback loop of degraded performance that users (rightly) blame on the tool.

In reality, it's the delivery path, not the AI engine, that's failing.

3. The Last Mile Is Now Mission-Critical

Pre-pandemic, the last mile — how data gets from your environment to the end user — was often treated as a best-effort concern. Today, it's a critical variable in application success.

As AI moves closer to the user powering in-app suggestions, decision support, and real-time collaboration, variability in home networks, ISP performance, or even Wi-Fi strength becomes a key limiter.

The user experience is shaped by the weakest link, and in remote or hybrid environments, that's often the last mile. When that link fails, the AI tool appears to "not work," even if the backend is performing flawlessly.

What's more concerning is that these issues often don't trigger traditional alerts. But they silently affect usage, engagement, and ROI.

4. AI Traffic Patterns Don't Follow the Old Rules

One of the more subtle shifts AI introduces is in how and when data flows through the network.
Unlike predictable, transactional workflows, AI activity tends to be:

  • Spiky – sudden bursts of demand from large language models
  • Context-heavy – requiring multiple data sources to converge in real time
  • Edge-driven – activated from a variety of user devices and locations

Legacy capacity planning models based on average load or scheduled usage fail to capture the dynamic, real-time nature of AI access.

And when network teams can't anticipate these patterns, they can't design for them. That's when performance dips, buffering starts, and adoption stalls.

5. Access Security Layers Can Create Bottlenecks

There's no question that Zero Trust and layered security must be foundational in the AI era. But not all access solutions are built with AI workloads in mind.

When every request from an AI assistant is routed through multiple hops like VPN concentrators, ping ponged through ZTNA PoPs, inspection firewalls, or authentication gateways, latency builds. In the process, the responsiveness that defines great AI is lost.

This is especially true when the AI tool needs to pull in context across apps — emails, documents, calendars, CRM data. If that access is fragmented or slow, the assistant feels broken, even if it's secure.

Security shouldn't come at the cost of usability. But in many environments, it still does.

What IT Leaders Should Be Doing Now

The organizations that will succeed with AI aren't just those that build smart models or write good prompts. They're the ones that deliver AI to their people in a way that feels effortless, intuitive, and immediate.

Here's where to start:

  • Run a performance readiness check: Treat AI rollouts like any other critical system launch. Map dependencies, latency paths, and weak points.
  • Move beyond uptime as the main metric: AI interaction demands a shift from uptime to real-time. Are your tools responding fast enough to feel natural?
  • Reevaluate access architecture: Look for bottlenecks in legacy VPNs, ZTNA, proxies, or legacy routing setups that could delay cloud-native AI access.
  • Bring network and application teams together: AI success isn't just an app or infrastructure issue, it's a systems issue. Solve it collaboratively.

Conclusion

Enterprise AI isn't just a technology initiative, it's a performance challenge. The next phase of digital work won't be defined by who has the smartest tools, but by who can deliver them at the speed users expect with no friction, no lag, and no excuses.

That's why infrastructure decisions today carry outsized weight. Because delivering a powerful AI experience isn't about pushing more to the cloud. It's about bringing performance to the edge where work happens.

Cloudbrink is helping organizations solve the delivery layer ensuring secure, ultra-low-latency access for the future of intelligent work.

Prakash Mana is CEO of Cloudbrink

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.