Skip to main content

Is Your Network Ready for the AI Boom? 5 Overlooked Stress Points

Prakash Mana
Cloudbrink

Artificial intelligence is no longer a future investment. It's already embedded in how we work — whether through copilots in productivity apps, real-time transcription tools in meetings, or machine learning models fueling analytics and personalization.

But while enterprise adoption accelerates, there's one critical area many leaders have yet to examine: Can your network actually support AI at the speed your users expect?

The focus so far has been on AI itself:

Which tools are we rolling out?

What use cases make the most sense?

How do we stay compliant and competitive?

These are important questions. But they often overlook the layer that determines whether AI feels seamless or frustrating: the delivery infrastructure.

Even the most advanced AI models won't create value if users experience them as laggy, glitchy, or unreliable. That gap between capability and experience is often a result of hidden performance stress points.

Here are five of the most commonly overlooked.

1. Latency-Sensitive Workflows Are Now Everywhere

AI is no longer confined to backend systems. It's becoming part of the moment-to-moment workflow across departments:

  • Sales reps rely on real-time call insights.
  • Engineers use AI code suggestions as they type.
  • Customer service teams leverage smart summaries between chats.

These are latency-sensitive interactions. A delay of even half a second can interrupt flow, create doubt, or lead users to skip the tool altogether.

Yet many enterprises still route traffic through centralized VPNs or legacy access infrastructure, introducing latency at the exact moment responsiveness matters most.

The shift to real-time AI interaction demands a corresponding shift in how we think about performance. Not just speed, but consistency under pressure.

2. Packet Loss Disrupts More Than Connectivity

In traditional office networks accessing local resources, mild packet loss may go unnoticed. But with AI in the loop using SaaS and GPUaaS resources, especially for live transcription, computer vision, or voice processing, packet loss directly affects the output.

Poor quality audio on a video call doesn't just inconvenience the listener, it degrades the accuracy of any AI assistant trying to capture notes or summarize outcomes.

When inference requests are repeatedly delayed, corrupted, or incomplete, it creates a feedback loop of degraded performance that users (rightly) blame on the tool.

In reality, it's the delivery path, not the AI engine, that's failing.

3. The Last Mile Is Now Mission-Critical

Pre-pandemic, the last mile — how data gets from your environment to the end user — was often treated as a best-effort concern. Today, it's a critical variable in application success.

As AI moves closer to the user powering in-app suggestions, decision support, and real-time collaboration, variability in home networks, ISP performance, or even Wi-Fi strength becomes a key limiter.

The user experience is shaped by the weakest link, and in remote or hybrid environments, that's often the last mile. When that link fails, the AI tool appears to "not work," even if the backend is performing flawlessly.

What's more concerning is that these issues often don't trigger traditional alerts. But they silently affect usage, engagement, and ROI.

4. AI Traffic Patterns Don't Follow the Old Rules

One of the more subtle shifts AI introduces is in how and when data flows through the network.
Unlike predictable, transactional workflows, AI activity tends to be:

  • Spiky – sudden bursts of demand from large language models
  • Context-heavy – requiring multiple data sources to converge in real time
  • Edge-driven – activated from a variety of user devices and locations

Legacy capacity planning models based on average load or scheduled usage fail to capture the dynamic, real-time nature of AI access.

And when network teams can't anticipate these patterns, they can't design for them. That's when performance dips, buffering starts, and adoption stalls.

5. Access Security Layers Can Create Bottlenecks

There's no question that Zero Trust and layered security must be foundational in the AI era. But not all access solutions are built with AI workloads in mind.

When every request from an AI assistant is routed through multiple hops like VPN concentrators, ping ponged through ZTNA PoPs, inspection firewalls, or authentication gateways, latency builds. In the process, the responsiveness that defines great AI is lost.

This is especially true when the AI tool needs to pull in context across apps — emails, documents, calendars, CRM data. If that access is fragmented or slow, the assistant feels broken, even if it's secure.

Security shouldn't come at the cost of usability. But in many environments, it still does.

What IT Leaders Should Be Doing Now

The organizations that will succeed with AI aren't just those that build smart models or write good prompts. They're the ones that deliver AI to their people in a way that feels effortless, intuitive, and immediate.

Here's where to start:

  • Run a performance readiness check: Treat AI rollouts like any other critical system launch. Map dependencies, latency paths, and weak points.
  • Move beyond uptime as the main metric: AI interaction demands a shift from uptime to real-time. Are your tools responding fast enough to feel natural?
  • Reevaluate access architecture: Look for bottlenecks in legacy VPNs, ZTNA, proxies, or legacy routing setups that could delay cloud-native AI access.
  • Bring network and application teams together: AI success isn't just an app or infrastructure issue, it's a systems issue. Solve it collaboratively.

Conclusion

Enterprise AI isn't just a technology initiative, it's a performance challenge. The next phase of digital work won't be defined by who has the smartest tools, but by who can deliver them at the speed users expect with no friction, no lag, and no excuses.

That's why infrastructure decisions today carry outsized weight. Because delivering a powerful AI experience isn't about pushing more to the cloud. It's about bringing performance to the edge where work happens.

Cloudbrink is helping organizations solve the delivery layer ensuring secure, ultra-low-latency access for the future of intelligent work.

Prakash Mana is CEO of Cloudbrink

The Latest

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

Is Your Network Ready for the AI Boom? 5 Overlooked Stress Points

Prakash Mana
Cloudbrink

Artificial intelligence is no longer a future investment. It's already embedded in how we work — whether through copilots in productivity apps, real-time transcription tools in meetings, or machine learning models fueling analytics and personalization.

But while enterprise adoption accelerates, there's one critical area many leaders have yet to examine: Can your network actually support AI at the speed your users expect?

The focus so far has been on AI itself:

Which tools are we rolling out?

What use cases make the most sense?

How do we stay compliant and competitive?

These are important questions. But they often overlook the layer that determines whether AI feels seamless or frustrating: the delivery infrastructure.

Even the most advanced AI models won't create value if users experience them as laggy, glitchy, or unreliable. That gap between capability and experience is often a result of hidden performance stress points.

Here are five of the most commonly overlooked.

1. Latency-Sensitive Workflows Are Now Everywhere

AI is no longer confined to backend systems. It's becoming part of the moment-to-moment workflow across departments:

  • Sales reps rely on real-time call insights.
  • Engineers use AI code suggestions as they type.
  • Customer service teams leverage smart summaries between chats.

These are latency-sensitive interactions. A delay of even half a second can interrupt flow, create doubt, or lead users to skip the tool altogether.

Yet many enterprises still route traffic through centralized VPNs or legacy access infrastructure, introducing latency at the exact moment responsiveness matters most.

The shift to real-time AI interaction demands a corresponding shift in how we think about performance. Not just speed, but consistency under pressure.

2. Packet Loss Disrupts More Than Connectivity

In traditional office networks accessing local resources, mild packet loss may go unnoticed. But with AI in the loop using SaaS and GPUaaS resources, especially for live transcription, computer vision, or voice processing, packet loss directly affects the output.

Poor quality audio on a video call doesn't just inconvenience the listener, it degrades the accuracy of any AI assistant trying to capture notes or summarize outcomes.

When inference requests are repeatedly delayed, corrupted, or incomplete, it creates a feedback loop of degraded performance that users (rightly) blame on the tool.

In reality, it's the delivery path, not the AI engine, that's failing.

3. The Last Mile Is Now Mission-Critical

Pre-pandemic, the last mile — how data gets from your environment to the end user — was often treated as a best-effort concern. Today, it's a critical variable in application success.

As AI moves closer to the user powering in-app suggestions, decision support, and real-time collaboration, variability in home networks, ISP performance, or even Wi-Fi strength becomes a key limiter.

The user experience is shaped by the weakest link, and in remote or hybrid environments, that's often the last mile. When that link fails, the AI tool appears to "not work," even if the backend is performing flawlessly.

What's more concerning is that these issues often don't trigger traditional alerts. But they silently affect usage, engagement, and ROI.

4. AI Traffic Patterns Don't Follow the Old Rules

One of the more subtle shifts AI introduces is in how and when data flows through the network.
Unlike predictable, transactional workflows, AI activity tends to be:

  • Spiky – sudden bursts of demand from large language models
  • Context-heavy – requiring multiple data sources to converge in real time
  • Edge-driven – activated from a variety of user devices and locations

Legacy capacity planning models based on average load or scheduled usage fail to capture the dynamic, real-time nature of AI access.

And when network teams can't anticipate these patterns, they can't design for them. That's when performance dips, buffering starts, and adoption stalls.

5. Access Security Layers Can Create Bottlenecks

There's no question that Zero Trust and layered security must be foundational in the AI era. But not all access solutions are built with AI workloads in mind.

When every request from an AI assistant is routed through multiple hops like VPN concentrators, ping ponged through ZTNA PoPs, inspection firewalls, or authentication gateways, latency builds. In the process, the responsiveness that defines great AI is lost.

This is especially true when the AI tool needs to pull in context across apps — emails, documents, calendars, CRM data. If that access is fragmented or slow, the assistant feels broken, even if it's secure.

Security shouldn't come at the cost of usability. But in many environments, it still does.

What IT Leaders Should Be Doing Now

The organizations that will succeed with AI aren't just those that build smart models or write good prompts. They're the ones that deliver AI to their people in a way that feels effortless, intuitive, and immediate.

Here's where to start:

  • Run a performance readiness check: Treat AI rollouts like any other critical system launch. Map dependencies, latency paths, and weak points.
  • Move beyond uptime as the main metric: AI interaction demands a shift from uptime to real-time. Are your tools responding fast enough to feel natural?
  • Reevaluate access architecture: Look for bottlenecks in legacy VPNs, ZTNA, proxies, or legacy routing setups that could delay cloud-native AI access.
  • Bring network and application teams together: AI success isn't just an app or infrastructure issue, it's a systems issue. Solve it collaboratively.

Conclusion

Enterprise AI isn't just a technology initiative, it's a performance challenge. The next phase of digital work won't be defined by who has the smartest tools, but by who can deliver them at the speed users expect with no friction, no lag, and no excuses.

That's why infrastructure decisions today carry outsized weight. Because delivering a powerful AI experience isn't about pushing more to the cloud. It's about bringing performance to the edge where work happens.

Cloudbrink is helping organizations solve the delivery layer ensuring secure, ultra-low-latency access for the future of intelligent work.

Prakash Mana is CEO of Cloudbrink

The Latest

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...