100G is Increasingly Popular, and It's Creating a Host of Management Challenges
November 02, 2020

Nadeem Zahid
cPacket Networks

Share this

Name virtually any technology trend — digital transformation, cloud-first operations, datacenter consolidation, mobility, streaming data, AI/ML, the application explosion, etc. — they all have one thing in common: an insatiable need for higher bandwidth (and often, low latency). The result is a steady push to move 10Gbps and 25Gbps network infrastructure toward the edge, and increasing adoption of 100Gbps in enterprise core, datacenter and service provider networks.

Initial deployments focused on backbone interconnects (historically a dual-ring failover topology; more recently mesh connectivity), primarily driven by north-south traffic. Data center adoption has followed, generally in spine-leaf architecture to handle increases in east-west connections.

Beyond a hunger for bandwidth, 100G is having a moment for several reasons: a commodity-derived drop in cost, increasing availability of 100G-enabled components, and the derivative ability to easily break 100G into 10/25G line rates. In light of these trends, analyst firm Dell'Oro expects 100G adoption to hit its stride this year and remain strong over the next five years.

Nobody in their right mind disputes the notion that enterprises and service providers will continue to adopt ever-faster networks. However, the same thing that makes 100G desirable — speed — conspires to create a host of challenges when trying to manage and monitor the infrastructure. The simple truth is that the faster the network, the more quickly things can go wrong. That makes monitoring for things like regulatory compliance, load balancing, incident response/forensics, capacity planning, etc., more important than ever.

At 10G, every packet is transmitted in 67 nanoseconds; at 100G that increases tenfold, with packets flying by at 6.7 nanoseconds. And therein lies the problem: when it comes to 100G, traditional management and monitoring infrastructure can't keep up.

The line-rate requirement varies based on where infrastructure sits in the monitoring stack. Network TAPs must be capable of mirroring data at 100G line speeds to packet brokers and tools. Packet brokers must handle that 100G traffic simultaneously on multiple ports, and process and forward each packet at line rate to the tool rail. Capture devices need to be able to achieve 100G bursts in capture-to-disk process. And any analysis layer must ingest information at 100G speeds to allow correlation, analysis and visualization.

Complicating matters are various "smart" features, each of which demand additional processing resources. As an example, packet brokers might include filtering, slicing and deduplication capabilities. If the system is already struggling with the line rate, any increased processing load degrades performance further.

For any infrastructure not designed with 100G in mind, the failure mode is inevitably the same: lost or dropped packets. That, in turn, results in network blind spots. When visibility is the goal, blind spots are — at the risk of oversimplification — bad. The impact can be incorrect calculations, slower time-to-resolution or incident response, longer malware dwell time, greater application performance fluctuation, compliance or SLA challenges and more.

Lossless monitoring requires that every part of the visibility stack is designed around 100G line speeds. Packet brokers in particular, given their central role in visibility infrastructure, are a critical chokepoint. Where possible, a two-tier monitoring architecture is recommended with a high-density 10/25/100G aggregation layer to aggregate TAPs and tools, and a high-performance 100G core packet broker to process and service the packets. While upgrades are possible, beware as they add cost yet may still not achieve true 100G line speeds when smart features centralize and share processing requirements at the core. Newer systems with a distributed/dedicated per-port processing architecture (versus shared central processing) are specifically designed to accommodate 100G line rates and eliminate these bottlenecks.

The overarching point is that desire for 100G performance cannot override the need for 100G visibility, or the entire network can suffer as a result. The visibility infrastructure needs to match the forwarding infrastructure. While 100G line rates are certainly possible with the latest monitoring equipment and software, IT teams must not assume that existing network visibility systems can keep up with the new load.

Nadeem Zahid is VP of Product Management & Marketing at cPacket Networks
Share this

The Latest

May 28, 2024
When it comes to ensuring the effectiveness of a software application, it's paramount to ensure that the application can handle varying degrees of demand. Performance testing is a crucial aspect of the software development cycle ...
May 23, 2024

Hybrid cloud architecture is breaking the backs of network engineering and operations teams. These teams are more successful when their companies go all-in with the cloud or stay out of it entirely. When companies maintain hybrid infrastructure, with applications and data residing across data centers and public cloud services, the network team struggles. This insight emerged in the newly published 2024 edition of Enterprise Management Associates' (EMA) Network Management Megatrends research ...

May 22, 2024

As IT practitioners, we often find ourselves fighting fires rather than proactively getting ahead ... Many spend countless hours managing several tools that give them different, fractured views of their own work — which isn't an effective use of time. Balancing daily technical tasks with long-term company goals requires a three-step approach. I'll share these steps and tips for others to do the same ...

May 21, 2024

IT service outages are more than a minor inconvenience. They can cost businesses millions while simultaneously leading to customer dissatisfaction and reputational damage. Moreover, the constant pressure of dealing with fire drills and escalations day and night can take a heavy toll on ITOps teams, leading to increased stress, human error, and burnout ...

May 20, 2024

Amid economic disruption, fintech competition, and other headwinds in recent years, banks have had to quickly adjust to the demands of the market. This adaptation is often reliant on having the right technology infrastructure in place ...

May 17, 2024

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 6, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network automation ...

May 16, 2024

In the ever-evolving landscape of software development and infrastructure management, observability stands as a crucial pillar. Among its fundamental components lies log collection ... However, traditional methods of log collection have faced challenges, especially in high-volume and dynamic environments. Enter eBPF, a groundbreaking technology ...

May 15, 2024

Businesses are dazzled by the promise of generative AI, as it touts the capability to increase productivity and efficiency, cut costs, and provide competitive advantages. With more and more generative AI options available today, businesses are now investigating how to convert the AI promise into profit. One way businesses are looking to do this is by using AI to improve personalized customer engagement ...

May 14, 2024

In the fast-evolving realm of cloud computing, where innovation collides with fiscal responsibility, the Flexera 2024 State of the Cloud Report illuminates the challenges and triumphs shaping the digital landscape ... At the forefront of this year's findings is the resounding chorus of organizations grappling with cloud costs ...

May 13, 2024

Government agencies are transforming to improve the digital experience for employees and citizens, allowing them to achieve key goals, including unleashing staff productivity, recruiting and retaining talent in the public sector, and delivering on the mission, according to the Global Digital Employee Experience (DEX) Survey from Riverbed ...