APMdigest followers will already have read the article on Gartner's 5 Dimensions of APM. While that article examines the advantages of single- or multi-vendor sourcing for the Application Performance Management (APM) tools that address these different dimensions, we'd like to look at this matter from a different angle: What are the important issues and goals to consider when evaluating a suite of APM solutions -- from one or more vendors -- to ensure that your APM solution will help IT operate at the new speed of business?
Consider Gartner's 5 dimensions of APM again:
1. End-user experience monitoring
The ability to capture end-to-end application performance data is critical, but few of today's apps are straight-line affairs. A web-based storefront, for instance, may present a user with ads or catalog information from sources that are outside of the storefront owner's own infrastructure. A traditional experience monitoring tool might look at how quickly the website interacts with the back-end sales applications. However, the speed of that transaction is only one part -- and a relatively late part -- of the user's experience.
If a problem outside of the vendor's infrastructure is delaying the delivery of third-party catalog content -- and causing the entire web page to load slowly -- the user may never get to the point of clicking the "Place my Order" button.
Today's businesses need APM tools that can monitor all aspects of the user experience. You may have no control over the third-party servers pushing content to your site, but you need to know how those servers affect the end user experience.
It also helps if your APM tools can enable you to make changes on the fly if the network links or external servers are compromising the overall experience you want to provide your users.
2. Run-time application architecture discovery, modeling, and display
The environment in which today's applications execute are more and more complex. With distributed networks, virtualized machines, web services and service-oriented architectures (and more), discovering, modeling, and displaying all the components that contribute to application performance is a challenge. You need tools that can provide real-time insight into all aspects of your application delivery infrastructure.
For efficiency's sake, IT organizations should be able to visualize this complete infrastructure on the same console that provides insight into the end-user experience. In a world of real-time business, IT teams need to be able to interact with all aspects of an APM solution quickly, efficiently, and effectively.
3. User-defined transaction profiling
User-defined transaction profiling is not just about tracing events as they occur among components or as they move across the paths discovered in the second dimension. What's important here is to understand whether events are occurring when, where, and as efficiently as you want them to occur.
Real-time IT organizations need APM tools for tracing events along an application path in the context of defined KPIs. To achieve that, these tools need to interact very efficiently with the APM tools you use for end user experience monitoring and run-time application architecture discovery, modeling, and display. This ensures efficient information reuse, but more importantly a frictionless interaction between these tools is that you need to minimize latency in the system. In a real-time, performance-oriented world, latency is to be avoided.
4. Component deep-dive monitoring in application context
The critical consideration related to deep dive monitoring is how well the tools you use work together. Six best-of-breed component monitoring tools presenting information on six different consoles would be absurd. Relying on a single manager of managers (MOM), though, to create the appearance of an integrated monitoring solution may simply mask the inefficiencies inherent in trying rely on six different monitoring tools.
If you decide not to use a single tool to provide deep-dive monitoring of your entire business infrastructure, be sure that your SI integrates the different tools you have selected with low-latency, real-time responsiveness in mind. Moreover, be sure that all the information captured by the tools can be used in real time by the other components within the APM suite.
If your data is modeled correctly -- and the important word here is "if" -- you can use sophisticated analytical tools to discover all kinds of opportunities to improve application performance or the user's experience of your application. The important consideration is the data model itself. All the tools we have just discussed must be able to contribute data easily to a performance management database (PMDB). If they cannot, you then have to invest in further complexity to deploy additional tools to transform data from one solution so that it becomes useful to other tools -- and that is highly inefficient.
Ultimately, it is important to consider the world in which your applications exist. Business is increasingly moving to a real-time model. It requires real-time responsiveness. Batch-oriented APM tools that are designed to support a break-fix mentality and aimed at infrastructure running exclusively on a corporate network over which IT has complete control -- these won't help you in the world we live in.
Your APM tools must provide real-time, transaction-orientation support. They must contribute to a real-time responsiveness, driven by the needs of business and focused on the quality of the user experience of the applications -- both inside and beyond the firewall.
About Raj Sabhlok and Suvish Viswanathan
Raj Sabhlok is the President of ManageEngine. Suvish Viswanathan is an APM Research Analyst at ManageEngine. ManageEngine is a division of Zoho Corp. and makers of a globally renowned suite of cost-effective network, systems, security, and applications management software solutions.
The requirements of an APM tool are now much more complex than they've ever been. Not only do they need to trace a user transaction across numerous microservices on the same system, but they also need to happen pretty fast ...
Performance monitoring is an old problem. As technology has advanced, we've had to evolve how we monitor applications. Initially, performance monitoring largely involved sending ICMP messages to start troubleshooting a down or slow application. Applications have gotten much more complex, so this is no longer enough. Now we need to know not just whether an application is broken, but why it broke. So APM has had to evolve over the years for us to get there. But how did this evolution take place, and what happens next? Let's find out ...
There are some IT organizations that are using DevOps methodology but are wary of getting bogged down in ITSM procedures. But without at least some ITSM controls in place, organizations lose their focus on systematic customer engagement, making it harder for them to scale ...
If you have deployed a Java application in production, you've probably encountered a situation where the application suddenly starts to take up a large amount of CPU. When this happens, application response becomes sluggish and users begin to complain about slow response. Often the solution to this problem is to restart the application and, lo and behold, the problem goes away — only to reappear a few days later. A key question then is: how to troubleshoot high CPU usage of a Java application? ...
Operations are no longer tethered tightly to a main office, as the headquarters-centric model has been retired in favor of a more decentralized enterprise structure. Rather than focus the business around a single location, enterprises are now comprised of a web of remote offices and individuals, where network connectivity has broken down the geographic barriers that in the past limited the availability of talent and resources. Key to the success of the decentralized enterprise model is a new generation of collaboration and communication tools ...
To better understand the AI maturity of businesses, Dotscience conducted a survey of 500 industry professionals. Research findings indicate that although enterprises are dedicating significant time and resources towards their AI deployments, many data science and ML teams don't have the adequate tools needed to properly collaborate on, build and deploy AI models efficiently ...
Digital transformation, migration to the enterprise cloud and increasing customer demands are creating a surge in IT complexity and the associated costs of managing it. Technical leaders around the world are concerned about the effect this has on IT performance and ultimately, their business according to a new report from Dynatrace, based on an independent global survey of 800 CIOs, Top Challenges for CIOs in a Software-Driven, Hybrid, Multi-Cloud World ...
APM tools are your window into your application's performance — its capacity and levels of service. However, traditional APM tools are now struggling due to the mismatch between their specifications and expectations. Modern application architectures are multi-faceted; they contain hybrid components across a variety of on-premise and cloud applications. Modern enterprises often generate data in silos with each outflow having its own data structure. This data comes from several tools over different periods of time. Such diversity in sources, structure, and formats present unique challenges for traditional enterprise tools ...
Today's organizations clearly understand the value of digital transformation and its ability to spark innovation. It's surprising that fewer than half of organizations have undertaken a digital transformation project. Workfront has identified five of the top challenges that IT teams face in digital transformation — and how to overcome them ...