Blue Triangle introduced VitalScope™, a tool for improving Core Web Vitals (CWV), Google user experience and organic site traffic.
The VitalScope™ feature within Blue Triangle's Continuous Experience Optimization platform helps online and omnichannel businesses turn their real user digital experience data and Google's CWV recommendations into actionable fixes.
Blue Triangle followed the published guidance of the Google Developer Relations team to develop a tool to quickly improve CWV scores to achieve consistent results. VitalScope™ provides a debugging blueprint for correcting hidden problems compromising performance that have the largest impact on your site, so teams can effectively optimize scores and user experience.
"We took the guidance from Google and built it into a tool that, in effect, puts your Core Web Vitals under a microscope to discover why scores are dropping and tells you exactly how to fix them for greater bottom-line results," said Blue Triangle CEO Lance Ullom. "Our customers are always looking for ways to reduce friction and provide a better experience. So, VitalScope was a lightbulb moment to get even more actionable insights from their RUM (Real User Monitoring) data."
VitalScope™ allows product teams to take deep dives beneath CWV scores, providing detailed information for each metric. It identifies every element contributing to a bad score, so DevOps knows what to fix. This new feature within Blue Triangle's platform helps websites capture and analyze this specific data in the context of what Google is looking at.
"Every marketer knows it's a big deal if any of your Core Web Vitals drop. The challenge has been understanding why and how to partner with dev resources to fix problems," said Chuck Moxley, global head of marketing at Blue Triangle. "VitalScope provides the missing piece that enables marketing, digital business teams and DevOps to work together to maintain healthy scores and Google search ranking."
VitalScope is available now to Blue Triangle customers.
The Latest
In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...
Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ...
Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...
Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...
Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...
The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...
The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...
In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...
AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.