Skip to main content

Bringing Order to the Chaos of BYOD

When it was the de-facto business standard, BlackBerrys provided two great benefits. First, they provided new communication capabilities that transformed the way professionals work. But for the IT team, they did something even better: providing a standardized platform with great management tools. Say what you will about the BES server, you could instantly reach out and admin any device, anywhere. Its major shortcoming wasn’t that RIM failed to innovate, (though that didn’t help), it was that it was expensive and effectively an IT tax on every connected employee.

It was a brilliant product strategy that generated revenue for RIM in a way no other BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) solution has managed to duplicate. Initially, a couple of geeks in IT, or more often Ops, got RIM devices which were then noticed by a techie senior exec. That then drove executive adoption, and for that you wanted a BES. Once the BES was in place, then you were a single solution organization - RIM. Every new user bought hardware and a BES seat. Budget managers were forced to accept it.

Rewind to 2008 when a few techie, often marketing people, started showing up with iPhone3s. They were connected enough with a friendly IT admin to get WiFi access. Techie execs saw them and said they wanted them too and “best of all”, said the first adopter, “you don’t need a BES server and I’ll pay for my own device”. Once the budget tsar got wind of that, BlackBerry was done. Unfortunately, so were the days of easy device administration.

Apple and Microsoft saw an opportunity and quickly worked together to make the iOS/Exchange Active Sync at least marginally useful to IT, allowing the budget office to counter the IT manageability argument. IT relented and opened some Guest SSIDs.

As with any shiny new technology that changes the world in a rush, this has produced a growing problem for IT managers. Few organizations believe they have an adequate BYOD management plan and it’s further compounded by the ever-increasing MDM (Mobile Device Management) problem that had already been an issue for some time.

In fact, in a recent SolarWinds-Network World Survey over 65% of IT organizations don’t feel confident that they have an adequate mobile device strategy in place.

Network and Systems admins work together as best they can to manage roving nodes, but most tools and techniques are limited to access control and bandwidth optimization. Even assuming you get those under control, there is still a long list of other concerns, from how many devices will actually show up, to ever changing app traffic mix, network and application security risks and even potential HR issues from content accessed on the company provided guest-network. So then, what can IT do today, to bring order to the chaos?

1. Get a handle on what’s connecting where with user device tracking software. It’s a switch port mapper for the mobile age.

2. Use your current system’s network monitoring and traffic analyzer to make sure the BYOD secondary SSID/subnet isn’t hogging the bandwidth for notebooks and other corporate mobile devices .

3. Determine how various users and departments are using mobile devices today and what they want to do in the future. Make sure usage is compatible with your organization's security policies.

BYOD has a bright future and there’s no question as techies, heck, as people, we prefer to select our own mobile device. For many of us it’s the single object we interact with more than anything else during the day. With a little planning and use of existing monitoring and management technologies, organizations can resolve many of their issues with BYOD. Who knows, one day we might even see a few BlackBerry Z10s playing nice on the same infrastructure as iOS and Androids.

ABOUT Patrick Hubbard

Patrick Hubbard is a Senior Technical Product Marketing Manager and Head Geek at SolarWinds. He joined SolarWinds in 2007 and combines 20 years of technical expertise with IT customer perspective to create geeky content that speaks to fellow networking and systems professionals. Hubbard’s previous roles have included product management and strategy, technical evangelism, sales engineering and software development in Austin high-tech and Fortune 500 companies.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Many organizations assumed their infrastructure strategy was settled. It had been implemented, optimized and built into long-term plans. Recent changes in technology and vendor consolidation are forcing a second look. Cloud outages and licensing changes have exposed how much dependency exists on a small number of platforms. As a result, organizations are reevaluating whether those decisions still hold up under current conditions ...

Edge AI is strategically embedded in core IT and infrastructure spending across industries, according to the 2026 Edge AI Survey from ZEDEDA. The research shows that 83% of C-suite and IT executive respondents say edge AI is important to their core business strategy ...

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

Bringing Order to the Chaos of BYOD

When it was the de-facto business standard, BlackBerrys provided two great benefits. First, they provided new communication capabilities that transformed the way professionals work. But for the IT team, they did something even better: providing a standardized platform with great management tools. Say what you will about the BES server, you could instantly reach out and admin any device, anywhere. Its major shortcoming wasn’t that RIM failed to innovate, (though that didn’t help), it was that it was expensive and effectively an IT tax on every connected employee.

It was a brilliant product strategy that generated revenue for RIM in a way no other BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) solution has managed to duplicate. Initially, a couple of geeks in IT, or more often Ops, got RIM devices which were then noticed by a techie senior exec. That then drove executive adoption, and for that you wanted a BES. Once the BES was in place, then you were a single solution organization - RIM. Every new user bought hardware and a BES seat. Budget managers were forced to accept it.

Rewind to 2008 when a few techie, often marketing people, started showing up with iPhone3s. They were connected enough with a friendly IT admin to get WiFi access. Techie execs saw them and said they wanted them too and “best of all”, said the first adopter, “you don’t need a BES server and I’ll pay for my own device”. Once the budget tsar got wind of that, BlackBerry was done. Unfortunately, so were the days of easy device administration.

Apple and Microsoft saw an opportunity and quickly worked together to make the iOS/Exchange Active Sync at least marginally useful to IT, allowing the budget office to counter the IT manageability argument. IT relented and opened some Guest SSIDs.

As with any shiny new technology that changes the world in a rush, this has produced a growing problem for IT managers. Few organizations believe they have an adequate BYOD management plan and it’s further compounded by the ever-increasing MDM (Mobile Device Management) problem that had already been an issue for some time.

In fact, in a recent SolarWinds-Network World Survey over 65% of IT organizations don’t feel confident that they have an adequate mobile device strategy in place.

Network and Systems admins work together as best they can to manage roving nodes, but most tools and techniques are limited to access control and bandwidth optimization. Even assuming you get those under control, there is still a long list of other concerns, from how many devices will actually show up, to ever changing app traffic mix, network and application security risks and even potential HR issues from content accessed on the company provided guest-network. So then, what can IT do today, to bring order to the chaos?

1. Get a handle on what’s connecting where with user device tracking software. It’s a switch port mapper for the mobile age.

2. Use your current system’s network monitoring and traffic analyzer to make sure the BYOD secondary SSID/subnet isn’t hogging the bandwidth for notebooks and other corporate mobile devices .

3. Determine how various users and departments are using mobile devices today and what they want to do in the future. Make sure usage is compatible with your organization's security policies.

BYOD has a bright future and there’s no question as techies, heck, as people, we prefer to select our own mobile device. For many of us it’s the single object we interact with more than anything else during the day. With a little planning and use of existing monitoring and management technologies, organizations can resolve many of their issues with BYOD. Who knows, one day we might even see a few BlackBerry Z10s playing nice on the same infrastructure as iOS and Androids.

ABOUT Patrick Hubbard

Patrick Hubbard is a Senior Technical Product Marketing Manager and Head Geek at SolarWinds. He joined SolarWinds in 2007 and combines 20 years of technical expertise with IT customer perspective to create geeky content that speaks to fellow networking and systems professionals. Hubbard’s previous roles have included product management and strategy, technical evangelism, sales engineering and software development in Austin high-tech and Fortune 500 companies.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Many organizations assumed their infrastructure strategy was settled. It had been implemented, optimized and built into long-term plans. Recent changes in technology and vendor consolidation are forcing a second look. Cloud outages and licensing changes have exposed how much dependency exists on a small number of platforms. As a result, organizations are reevaluating whether those decisions still hold up under current conditions ...

Edge AI is strategically embedded in core IT and infrastructure spending across industries, according to the 2026 Edge AI Survey from ZEDEDA. The research shows that 83% of C-suite and IT executive respondents say edge AI is important to their core business strategy ...

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...