
Cloudbrink announced a breakthrough platform designed to solve one of the most pressing challenges in enterprise tech: how to bring AI safely and efficiently into the enterprise without compromising compliance or performance.
The Cloudbrink AI platform is an AI-ready personal SASE platform that gives enterprises the missing piece for safe, compliant, and lightning-fast AI adoption.
IT and security leaders today have to manage the tension between the need to innovate quickly, and the risk of exposing sensitive data through ungoverned AI use. Cloudbrink’s new AI-ready platform bridges that gap. It brings together a Zero-Trust approach, compliance intelligence, and high-performance connectivity into a single platform purpose-built for the era of enterprise AI.
“AI is the biggest transformation enterprises have seen in decades—but adoption has been slowed by security, compliance, and performance concerns,” said Prakash Mana, CEO of Cloudbrink. “Cloudbrink now removes those barriers. IT and security teams get the control they need, while developers and employees enjoy the speed they expect. We’re giving organizations the clarity, control, and speed they need to embrace AI responsibly.”
As enterprises accelerate their use of generative AI, language models, and agent-based automation, the risks of shadow AI, data exfiltration, and unauthorized API use have multiplied. Cloudbrink’s AI-ready platform applies Zero-Trust principles to AI workloads, providing context-aware security, data governance, and high-performance connectivity within a single architecture.
Unlike other SASE and ZTNA solutions that simply bolt AI onto legacy security systems, Cloudbrink’s new platform approaches AI based on how enterprise networks should operate in an AI-native world. Cloudbrink enforces policies at the AI-service and agent layer, not just the user or application layer because AI systems behave differently from human users, and have to be secured differently as well.
Cloudbrink now allows enterprises to consume and build AI services more smoothly and quickly. With Cloudbrink, organizations can:
- Enable secure, compliant AI access across every employee and endpoint, with controls to detect shadow AI use and prevent sensitive data exfiltration to and from AI services.
- Safely adopt enterprise AI Agents with data protection and least-privilege access controls, real-time policy enforcement, deep integrations with identity systems like Entra and Okta, and the ability to segregate AI agent traffic from user traffic for increased protection.
- Empower AI developers to quickly create AI agents that function at high speed using Cloudbrink’s global FAST Edge network, providing near-LAN performance for GPU and data-intensive workloads.
Cloudbrink also provides crucial visibility into how AI is affecting enterprise networks. AI usage can be monitored directly on the Cloudbrink portal, which shows which AI agents are using which AI tools and services, which are the most common AI services and tools being used, and which AI tools or services have large volumes of data being exchanged.
The Cloudbrink AI platform will be available next month.
The Latest
As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...
For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...
I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...
Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...
80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...
40% of organizations deploying AI will implement dedicated AI observability tools by 2028 to monitor model performance, bias and outputs, according to Gartner ...
Until AI-powered engineering tools have live visibility of how code behaves at runtime, they cannot be trusted to autonomously ensure reliable systems, according to the State of AI-Powered Engineering Report 2026 report from Lightrun. The report reveals that a major volume of manual work is required when AI-generated code is deployed: 43% of AI-generated code requires manual debugging in production, even after passing QA or staging tests. Furthermore, an average of three manual redeploy cycles are required to verify a single AI-suggested code fix in production ...
Many organizations describe AI as strategic, but they do not manage it strategically. When AI plans are disconnected from strategy, detached from organizational learning, and protected from serious assumptions testing, the problem is no longer technical immaturity; it is a failure of management discipline ... Executives too often tell organizations to "use AI" before they define what AI is supposed to change. The problem deepens in organizations where strategy isn't well articulated in the first place ...
Across the enterprise technology landscape, a quiet crisis is playing out. Organizations have run hundreds, sometimes thousands, of generative AI pilots. Leadership has celebrated the proof of concept (POCs) ... Industry experience points to a sobering reality: only 5-10% of AI POCs that progress to the pilot stage successfully reach scaled production. The remaining 90% fail because the enterprise environment around them was never ready to absorb them, not the AI models ...
Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...
