Skip to main content

Data Matters More Than Ever in AIOps

New study reveals key hurdles on the road to AIOps
Bhanu Singh

Like any new, potentially disruptive technology, artificial intelligence for IT operations, or AIOps has quickly become a trend, and slowly become a reality. It's only been a few years since Gartner coined the term, and yet, 30% of IT teams in large enterprises will roll out AIOps initiatives by 2023. These IT practitioners are still in experimentation mode with artificial intelligence in many cases, and still have concerns about how credible the technology can be. They have concerns over the results of these implementations, and worry about maintaining service availability and uptime during migration.

Because AIOps is still in its infancy, there hasn't been much reporting on what these concerns specifically are. A recent study from OpsRamp targeted these IT managers who have implemented AIOps, and among other data, reports on the primary concerns of this new approach to operations management.

The Devil is in the Data

The report cites data accuracy as the chief concern for IT pros when it comes to AIOps. Two-thirds (67%) of those surveyed revealed it as their top priority. This could be for a variety of reasons, including:

Data Sources: In a world of distributed, hybrid, multi-cloud infrastructure, it's more difficult than ever to capture data on every level of an organization. Different cloud providers report in different ways. And point tools provide analytics across a host of different metrics. It's next to impossible to compare data sources together for a true contextual view of the organization.

Data Quality: Even when that data is captured, these IT teams aren't necessarily sure that it's accurately reflecting the truth about a system. Modern data can be fragmented, hidden, unparsed or too distributed to make sense.

Data Volume: Today's enterprise infrastructure produces an overwhelming amount of metrics on usage, capacity, performance, availability, security, and more. It's easy to get lost in the noise.

Data Consistency: It's impossible to say, under the crushing weight of data today, that IT teams are seeing consistent reporting and results across the organization. But until data is consistent, it can't be actionable.

Data Culture: This is perhaps the biggest change the world of IT operations will resist as it continues to adopt AIOps. Most organizations today are still process-driven, focusing maniacally on improving, tweaking, and changing the process to get a different result. Tomorrow's AIOps-driven organization will become data-driven, putting that same focus on refining data for better outcomes.

Improving Accuracy by Changing Culture

Becoming a data-driven organization means shifting priorities from process milestones to data-based ones, where data manipulation and governance are critical. It's building an organization where data modeling is as important as product development, and where data drives business outcomes. It's where there's as much focused placed on algorithms as applications. Once this culture is installed, where the focus becomes accuracy, consistency, and context, can an operations team truly trust the data. And this is where AIOps can truly come to life.

Data accuracy isn't the only concern when it comes to AIOps adoption, but it's definitely on the minds of IT managers and infrastructure professionals. Where they once just struggled to find skilled practitioners and leading-edge technology to solve problems, they now must also juggle a focus on data. It's clear that enterprises will need more time to build trust in the relevance and reliability of AIOps recommendations. This also represents an opportunity for AIOps vendors to provide solutions that drive improved accuracy, cleaner data, and greater control. AIOps promises to transform how IT operations is managed and maintained. It's likely to do the same for data.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Data Matters More Than Ever in AIOps

New study reveals key hurdles on the road to AIOps
Bhanu Singh

Like any new, potentially disruptive technology, artificial intelligence for IT operations, or AIOps has quickly become a trend, and slowly become a reality. It's only been a few years since Gartner coined the term, and yet, 30% of IT teams in large enterprises will roll out AIOps initiatives by 2023. These IT practitioners are still in experimentation mode with artificial intelligence in many cases, and still have concerns about how credible the technology can be. They have concerns over the results of these implementations, and worry about maintaining service availability and uptime during migration.

Because AIOps is still in its infancy, there hasn't been much reporting on what these concerns specifically are. A recent study from OpsRamp targeted these IT managers who have implemented AIOps, and among other data, reports on the primary concerns of this new approach to operations management.

The Devil is in the Data

The report cites data accuracy as the chief concern for IT pros when it comes to AIOps. Two-thirds (67%) of those surveyed revealed it as their top priority. This could be for a variety of reasons, including:

Data Sources: In a world of distributed, hybrid, multi-cloud infrastructure, it's more difficult than ever to capture data on every level of an organization. Different cloud providers report in different ways. And point tools provide analytics across a host of different metrics. It's next to impossible to compare data sources together for a true contextual view of the organization.

Data Quality: Even when that data is captured, these IT teams aren't necessarily sure that it's accurately reflecting the truth about a system. Modern data can be fragmented, hidden, unparsed or too distributed to make sense.

Data Volume: Today's enterprise infrastructure produces an overwhelming amount of metrics on usage, capacity, performance, availability, security, and more. It's easy to get lost in the noise.

Data Consistency: It's impossible to say, under the crushing weight of data today, that IT teams are seeing consistent reporting and results across the organization. But until data is consistent, it can't be actionable.

Data Culture: This is perhaps the biggest change the world of IT operations will resist as it continues to adopt AIOps. Most organizations today are still process-driven, focusing maniacally on improving, tweaking, and changing the process to get a different result. Tomorrow's AIOps-driven organization will become data-driven, putting that same focus on refining data for better outcomes.

Improving Accuracy by Changing Culture

Becoming a data-driven organization means shifting priorities from process milestones to data-based ones, where data manipulation and governance are critical. It's building an organization where data modeling is as important as product development, and where data drives business outcomes. It's where there's as much focused placed on algorithms as applications. Once this culture is installed, where the focus becomes accuracy, consistency, and context, can an operations team truly trust the data. And this is where AIOps can truly come to life.

Data accuracy isn't the only concern when it comes to AIOps adoption, but it's definitely on the minds of IT managers and infrastructure professionals. Where they once just struggled to find skilled practitioners and leading-edge technology to solve problems, they now must also juggle a focus on data. It's clear that enterprises will need more time to build trust in the relevance and reliability of AIOps recommendations. This also represents an opportunity for AIOps vendors to provide solutions that drive improved accuracy, cleaner data, and greater control. AIOps promises to transform how IT operations is managed and maintained. It's likely to do the same for data.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.