Skip to main content

Don't Be the Next Instapaper

Michelle McLean

Instapaper, a "read later" tool for saving web pages to read on other devices or offline, suffered an extensive outage 2 weeks ago. The site was unavailable for a day and a half, and even after restoring service, the company had to explain that its archives would be impacted for another full week. Ultimately, it was able to restore the archives sooner, but the outage garnered extensive press and social media coverage.

The cause of the outage was that an indexing file Instapaper relies on for reaching all stored links exceeded the max file size supported on the older instance of Amazon Web Services the site was first built on. You can read if you want more details .

While Instapaper hit a unique problem — a file size limitation — its experience speaks to a much larger problem: scaling a database is difficult, and never quick. That basic fact explains why outages like the one Instapaper suffered are surprisingly common.

Engineering a scaled database — and then performing the application changes needed to take advantage of that scaled out database — is tough coding work indeed. We encounter companies with full control of their source code who are petrified to make the changes needed to scale database capacity. Perhaps it's an ecommerce app, and it's too close to Black Friday. Or maybe it's just a case of attrition: the folks who really understand that code base are long gone, and the current engineers don't dare mess with the interworkings of the app.

These kinds of meltdowns are common during surge events, like the one ESPN suffered with the launch of Fantasy Football or the one Macy's suffered last Black Friday. Sometimes customers can see these events coming (e.g., they're expecting a major traffic surge on Black Friday) and sometimes they simply don't (e.g., their product gets a nod from a celebrity and all of a sudden they're swamped).

When a traffic surge takes down your site, it usually means the data tier was already fragile. Scaling the web infrastructure is pretty easy, as is scaling internet capacity. But scaling the data tier itself is where the challenges lie.

The Instapaper crisis also illustrates how the cloud alone doesn't solve the challenge of scaling the data tier. While elasticity is a hallmark of cloud services, the physics around having an application talk to multiple instances of a database remains a challenge. We've seen some customers suffer from an inflated sense of confidence that running in the cloud takes away these difficulties.

Don't wait for disaster to strike. Whether you're running on prem or in the cloud, keep a close eye on all metrics that reveal how "hot" your systems are running. Ensure your disaster recovery plan is robust — and recently tested. Better yet, don't rely on disaster recovery. Instead, run in active/active mode, where you've got multiple instances of all critical systems running in different locales, with the systems able to take on the full load if one portion fails.

Take steps now to scale your data tier and avoid these kinds of catastrophic outages. Those "Here's why we failed" engineering blog entries are no fun to write.

Michelle McLean is VP of Marketing at ScaleArc.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Don't Be the Next Instapaper

Michelle McLean

Instapaper, a "read later" tool for saving web pages to read on other devices or offline, suffered an extensive outage 2 weeks ago. The site was unavailable for a day and a half, and even after restoring service, the company had to explain that its archives would be impacted for another full week. Ultimately, it was able to restore the archives sooner, but the outage garnered extensive press and social media coverage.

The cause of the outage was that an indexing file Instapaper relies on for reaching all stored links exceeded the max file size supported on the older instance of Amazon Web Services the site was first built on. You can read if you want more details .

While Instapaper hit a unique problem — a file size limitation — its experience speaks to a much larger problem: scaling a database is difficult, and never quick. That basic fact explains why outages like the one Instapaper suffered are surprisingly common.

Engineering a scaled database — and then performing the application changes needed to take advantage of that scaled out database — is tough coding work indeed. We encounter companies with full control of their source code who are petrified to make the changes needed to scale database capacity. Perhaps it's an ecommerce app, and it's too close to Black Friday. Or maybe it's just a case of attrition: the folks who really understand that code base are long gone, and the current engineers don't dare mess with the interworkings of the app.

These kinds of meltdowns are common during surge events, like the one ESPN suffered with the launch of Fantasy Football or the one Macy's suffered last Black Friday. Sometimes customers can see these events coming (e.g., they're expecting a major traffic surge on Black Friday) and sometimes they simply don't (e.g., their product gets a nod from a celebrity and all of a sudden they're swamped).

When a traffic surge takes down your site, it usually means the data tier was already fragile. Scaling the web infrastructure is pretty easy, as is scaling internet capacity. But scaling the data tier itself is where the challenges lie.

The Instapaper crisis also illustrates how the cloud alone doesn't solve the challenge of scaling the data tier. While elasticity is a hallmark of cloud services, the physics around having an application talk to multiple instances of a database remains a challenge. We've seen some customers suffer from an inflated sense of confidence that running in the cloud takes away these difficulties.

Don't wait for disaster to strike. Whether you're running on prem or in the cloud, keep a close eye on all metrics that reveal how "hot" your systems are running. Ensure your disaster recovery plan is robust — and recently tested. Better yet, don't rely on disaster recovery. Instead, run in active/active mode, where you've got multiple instances of all critical systems running in different locales, with the systems able to take on the full load if one portion fails.

Take steps now to scale your data tier and avoid these kinds of catastrophic outages. Those "Here's why we failed" engineering blog entries are no fun to write.

Michelle McLean is VP of Marketing at ScaleArc.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.