Skip to main content

Driving Business Value with Production-Ready AIOps - Part 2

Vinay Chandrasekhar
Elastic

Welcome to part two of a three-part blog series that explores how AIOps has become an increasingly important consideration for operations teams. In this second part of the blog series, we look at how adopting AIOps capabilities can drive business value for an organization.

If you missed part one, you can find it here.

Let's dive in.

How Does AIOps Drive Business Value for an Organization?

As with many IT and software development initiatives, AIOps benefits organizations and teams in multiple ways. While AIOps can significantly reduce the mundane and repetitive work required by IT operations (ITOps), site reliability engineering (SRE), and DevOps teams, the benefits also extend to other parts of the business:.

■ Reducing the mean-time-to-detection (MTTD) and mean-time-to-resolution (MTTR) ultimately means less service downtime, improved SLAs, and an enhanced customer experience.

■ Helping organizations deal with rapidly growing data volumes intelligently, reducing total cost-of-ownership (TCO), and alleviating scale challenges.

■ Reducing alert noise and implementing better automation can help free operations teams to take on higher-value initiatives.

■ Improving an organization's ability to handle ever-increasing IT complexity and the overall pace of change, AIOps allows businesses to bring value to customers more quickly and frequently.

Given the volume, complexity, and pace of change in today's cloud-native and hybrid application environments, AIOps is increasingly moving from a nice-to-have capability to a mission-critical competency for IT operations teams.

How Do You Build Trust in AIOps and Make Sure It Is Production-Ready?

IT personnel, SREs, and DevOps engineers have a couple of adoption hurdles they must cross to successfully utilize AIOps for their observability use cases.

On the one hand, there are significant buzzword challenges. The market for AIOps has a lot of buzzwords. Users can face questions such as what is the business value beyond those buzzwords? And whether AIOps will help them detect and remediate problems better and more efficiently than their current monitoring or observability setup. Beyond the buzzwords and hype, users may not always know if they will benefit from AI/ML for a specific use case.

And then there are trust hurdles. One hurdle is users' inability to tell whether the AIOps-based insights are accurate. Users might not even be aware of how comprehensive the analysis is, the information used, how the algorithms work, how conclusions are arrived at, or if those conclusions are relevant to their current investigation, resulting in a general distrust of black box AIOps systems. In some cases, organizational pressures or policies motivated by a lack of trust may also present barriers to AIOps adoption.

Our experience has shown that the best way for AIOps to provide its value is through its slow and steady adoption. First, identify specific, time-tested, and proven use cases to start adopting AIOps as a proof of concept (POC). Next, enable AIOps functionality on a smaller subset of your deployment while validating and socializing benefits and outcomes at each stage. Once you've seen some success, incrementally enable more AIOps functionality with a move towards production environments. This deliberate deployment path alleviates some of the traditional challenges associated with deploying new technology that can otherwise deter widespread AIOps adoption.

Testing and proving technology effectiveness in a smaller lab or non-production environment and measuring and showcasing results to management can help increase confidence and get buy-in before deploying AIOps in a real-world production environment. Such testing might unearth other gaps and requirements, such as missing or inconsistent data, shallow coverage, or insufficient storage or compute. As you deploy AIOps in production, check to see if your Observability solution can scale its features appropriately and handle your enterprise workloads. Certain AIOps features that work well in lab or POC environments may struggle to keep up with larger-scale requirements typically encountered in production environments.

In Part 3 of our AIOps beginners guide series, we'll talk about AI/ML capabilities beyond traditional AIOps that can further benefit Observability. And we'll take a peek into the future of AIOps. Until next time, keep observing!

Vinay Chandrasekhar is Sr. Principal Product Manager, Observability, at Elastic

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Driving Business Value with Production-Ready AIOps - Part 2

Vinay Chandrasekhar
Elastic

Welcome to part two of a three-part blog series that explores how AIOps has become an increasingly important consideration for operations teams. In this second part of the blog series, we look at how adopting AIOps capabilities can drive business value for an organization.

If you missed part one, you can find it here.

Let's dive in.

How Does AIOps Drive Business Value for an Organization?

As with many IT and software development initiatives, AIOps benefits organizations and teams in multiple ways. While AIOps can significantly reduce the mundane and repetitive work required by IT operations (ITOps), site reliability engineering (SRE), and DevOps teams, the benefits also extend to other parts of the business:.

■ Reducing the mean-time-to-detection (MTTD) and mean-time-to-resolution (MTTR) ultimately means less service downtime, improved SLAs, and an enhanced customer experience.

■ Helping organizations deal with rapidly growing data volumes intelligently, reducing total cost-of-ownership (TCO), and alleviating scale challenges.

■ Reducing alert noise and implementing better automation can help free operations teams to take on higher-value initiatives.

■ Improving an organization's ability to handle ever-increasing IT complexity and the overall pace of change, AIOps allows businesses to bring value to customers more quickly and frequently.

Given the volume, complexity, and pace of change in today's cloud-native and hybrid application environments, AIOps is increasingly moving from a nice-to-have capability to a mission-critical competency for IT operations teams.

How Do You Build Trust in AIOps and Make Sure It Is Production-Ready?

IT personnel, SREs, and DevOps engineers have a couple of adoption hurdles they must cross to successfully utilize AIOps for their observability use cases.

On the one hand, there are significant buzzword challenges. The market for AIOps has a lot of buzzwords. Users can face questions such as what is the business value beyond those buzzwords? And whether AIOps will help them detect and remediate problems better and more efficiently than their current monitoring or observability setup. Beyond the buzzwords and hype, users may not always know if they will benefit from AI/ML for a specific use case.

And then there are trust hurdles. One hurdle is users' inability to tell whether the AIOps-based insights are accurate. Users might not even be aware of how comprehensive the analysis is, the information used, how the algorithms work, how conclusions are arrived at, or if those conclusions are relevant to their current investigation, resulting in a general distrust of black box AIOps systems. In some cases, organizational pressures or policies motivated by a lack of trust may also present barriers to AIOps adoption.

Our experience has shown that the best way for AIOps to provide its value is through its slow and steady adoption. First, identify specific, time-tested, and proven use cases to start adopting AIOps as a proof of concept (POC). Next, enable AIOps functionality on a smaller subset of your deployment while validating and socializing benefits and outcomes at each stage. Once you've seen some success, incrementally enable more AIOps functionality with a move towards production environments. This deliberate deployment path alleviates some of the traditional challenges associated with deploying new technology that can otherwise deter widespread AIOps adoption.

Testing and proving technology effectiveness in a smaller lab or non-production environment and measuring and showcasing results to management can help increase confidence and get buy-in before deploying AIOps in a real-world production environment. Such testing might unearth other gaps and requirements, such as missing or inconsistent data, shallow coverage, or insufficient storage or compute. As you deploy AIOps in production, check to see if your Observability solution can scale its features appropriately and handle your enterprise workloads. Certain AIOps features that work well in lab or POC environments may struggle to keep up with larger-scale requirements typically encountered in production environments.

In Part 3 of our AIOps beginners guide series, we'll talk about AI/ML capabilities beyond traditional AIOps that can further benefit Observability. And we'll take a peek into the future of AIOps. Until next time, keep observing!

Vinay Chandrasekhar is Sr. Principal Product Manager, Observability, at Elastic

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.