Skip to main content

The IT Investment Paradox: Why Bigger Budgets Are Creating Slower Decisions

Eugene Khvostov
Apptio

It's the paradox at the heart of enterprise IT in 2026: teams secure a record-level budget, but instead of immediately innovating and evolving with new tools and seeing results, decision-making has slowed to a crawl. They're flying blind, unable to connect massive investments in areas like AI and cloud to the one thing the business actually cares about: value.

For technology leaders, 2026 is the year to bring business context and value back into the IT conversation. Apptio just released its 2026 Technology Investment Management Report, which revealed 74% of organizations are increasing their IT budgets, yet there is a staggering disconnect. While priorities are clear — with 94% of leaders focusing on cybersecurity and 91% on AI — nearly half (49%) struggle with cloud cost volatility and 43% are concerned about the costs of AI/ML. As budgets scale, the sheer complexity of the IT landscape is outpacing the tools to manage it, making it difficult for leaders to obtain the forecasting needed to make confident decisions and translate investments into results. This isn't just a temporary challenge; it's a sign of a much deeper evolution.

By building IT Financial Management (ITFM) resilience, shifting from project-based to product-based operating models, and incorporating AI-powered financial intelligence, an agile, outcome-driven approach is possible, helping teams work efficiently and eliminate ROI uncertainty. The old playbook for managing technology is outdated, and a new one is taking its place, defined by three seismic shifts that are already separating the leaders from the laggards.

The Confidence-Capability Gap

Reliance on outdated tools is directly impacting leader confidence and slowing down critical decisions, presenting a significant, untapped opportunity for organizations. The report found that 90% of leaders say uncertainty about ROI has a moderate to major impact on their investment decisions — an increase from 85% in 2025. This doubt is fueled by a disconnect between perception and reality. While nearly 59% of ITFM professionals believe their forecasts are highly accurate, only 35% use purpose-built ITFM tools. Nearly 47% still rely on generic ERP systems, with others still dependent on manual spreadsheets.

Disconnected systems and unclear metrics compound the confidence problem. Distrust in data (84%) and persistent data silos (80%) make it even harder to find the insights necessary to justify spend. These manual and generic tools introduce delays and inaccuracies that limit scalability, making it difficult for leaders to achieve the transparency and agility stakeholders now expect. When nearly every leader questions ROI, investment decisions stall, and the gap between what leaders think they know and what they can prove continues to widen. By integrating IT Services Management (ITSM) anchored in Technology Business Management (TBM) practices, enterprises can increase visibility and understand the true ROI across labor, licenses and infrastructure.

Building ITFM Resilience

Many teams continue to struggle with visibility, alignment and forecasting, creating not only operational and confidence gaps but also major business risks, including runaway cloud spend, stalled innovation, and diminished stakeholder confidence. Closing the confidence gap requires more than just optimism; it requires building ITFM resilience through deliberate, strategic action.

First, start with the basics. Establish foundational capabilities like complete cost transparency and accurate forecasting. Second, modernize the toolkit to automate data integration and finally reduce the risky reliance on spreadsheets, as they create delays and impact decision-making capabilities. From there, adopt dynamic planning, moving beyond rigid annual cycles to an agile, iterative model that can keep pace with the business and evolve alongside it. Finally, build stakeholder alignment by engaging finance, IT, and business leaders with a common, data-driven language for IT spend.

ITFM maturity isn't about perfection — it's about progress. Taking these steps creates a single source of truth that can shift IT from operating as a siloed cost center to becoming a strategic and connected business asset driving innovation and growth.

The Shift from Projects to Products

The data reveals why a fundamental shift from project-based to product-based operating models is no longer optional — it's critical. The pressures forcing this change are already clear. With FinOps teams growing in both size and cross-functional diversity (61% are now over six people) and AI funding becoming more dynamic (67% of organizations are reallocating internal capital), the rigidity of static, annual project plans has become a primary roadblock to innovation. Without strong FinOps fundamentals — visibility, forecasting, and accountability — organizations risk runaway cloud spend, delayed innovation and diminished stakeholder confidence.

To manage this new reality, teams must operate like product development engines, with defined sprints, clear OKRs, and intense scrutiny on business performance to unlock more agile ways of working and allow funding and resources to track product success in real time. This is where integrating ITSM with TBM becomes critical. The integrated framework provides the real-time visibility needed to track product performance, understand ROI across labor, licenses and infrastructure, and ultimately unlock a more accountable, outcome-driven way of working that closes the gap between strategy and execution.

AI as the Enabler for Real-Time Intelligence

This agile, product-centric model is impossible without an equally agile approach to financial data — one powered by AI. The AI era requires near real-time, integrated financial and operational information to make sound decisions at high speed. AI-powered financial intelligence is the key that eliminates data silos, connecting disparate costs to direct business value and democratizing insight for every user. By pairing this powerful financial insight with agile ways of working, IT leaders and their teams can finally close the confidence-capability gap and take definitive control over their decisions.

The path forward for technology leaders is clear: those who cling to spreadsheets and rigid annual plans will fall behind and become paralyzed when it comes to proving business value. The leaders who will thrive in 2026 and beyond will be those that focus their priorities on building ITFM resilience, shift towards a product-centric mindset, and leverage AI to transform data into strategic insights. By making these changes, IT leaders can close the gap between budget and value, reclaim their role as essential drivers of business innovation, and gain their confidence back for good. 

Eugene Khvostov is Chief Product Officer at Apptio

Hot Topics

The Latest

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

The IT Investment Paradox: Why Bigger Budgets Are Creating Slower Decisions

Eugene Khvostov
Apptio

It's the paradox at the heart of enterprise IT in 2026: teams secure a record-level budget, but instead of immediately innovating and evolving with new tools and seeing results, decision-making has slowed to a crawl. They're flying blind, unable to connect massive investments in areas like AI and cloud to the one thing the business actually cares about: value.

For technology leaders, 2026 is the year to bring business context and value back into the IT conversation. Apptio just released its 2026 Technology Investment Management Report, which revealed 74% of organizations are increasing their IT budgets, yet there is a staggering disconnect. While priorities are clear — with 94% of leaders focusing on cybersecurity and 91% on AI — nearly half (49%) struggle with cloud cost volatility and 43% are concerned about the costs of AI/ML. As budgets scale, the sheer complexity of the IT landscape is outpacing the tools to manage it, making it difficult for leaders to obtain the forecasting needed to make confident decisions and translate investments into results. This isn't just a temporary challenge; it's a sign of a much deeper evolution.

By building IT Financial Management (ITFM) resilience, shifting from project-based to product-based operating models, and incorporating AI-powered financial intelligence, an agile, outcome-driven approach is possible, helping teams work efficiently and eliminate ROI uncertainty. The old playbook for managing technology is outdated, and a new one is taking its place, defined by three seismic shifts that are already separating the leaders from the laggards.

The Confidence-Capability Gap

Reliance on outdated tools is directly impacting leader confidence and slowing down critical decisions, presenting a significant, untapped opportunity for organizations. The report found that 90% of leaders say uncertainty about ROI has a moderate to major impact on their investment decisions — an increase from 85% in 2025. This doubt is fueled by a disconnect between perception and reality. While nearly 59% of ITFM professionals believe their forecasts are highly accurate, only 35% use purpose-built ITFM tools. Nearly 47% still rely on generic ERP systems, with others still dependent on manual spreadsheets.

Disconnected systems and unclear metrics compound the confidence problem. Distrust in data (84%) and persistent data silos (80%) make it even harder to find the insights necessary to justify spend. These manual and generic tools introduce delays and inaccuracies that limit scalability, making it difficult for leaders to achieve the transparency and agility stakeholders now expect. When nearly every leader questions ROI, investment decisions stall, and the gap between what leaders think they know and what they can prove continues to widen. By integrating IT Services Management (ITSM) anchored in Technology Business Management (TBM) practices, enterprises can increase visibility and understand the true ROI across labor, licenses and infrastructure.

Building ITFM Resilience

Many teams continue to struggle with visibility, alignment and forecasting, creating not only operational and confidence gaps but also major business risks, including runaway cloud spend, stalled innovation, and diminished stakeholder confidence. Closing the confidence gap requires more than just optimism; it requires building ITFM resilience through deliberate, strategic action.

First, start with the basics. Establish foundational capabilities like complete cost transparency and accurate forecasting. Second, modernize the toolkit to automate data integration and finally reduce the risky reliance on spreadsheets, as they create delays and impact decision-making capabilities. From there, adopt dynamic planning, moving beyond rigid annual cycles to an agile, iterative model that can keep pace with the business and evolve alongside it. Finally, build stakeholder alignment by engaging finance, IT, and business leaders with a common, data-driven language for IT spend.

ITFM maturity isn't about perfection — it's about progress. Taking these steps creates a single source of truth that can shift IT from operating as a siloed cost center to becoming a strategic and connected business asset driving innovation and growth.

The Shift from Projects to Products

The data reveals why a fundamental shift from project-based to product-based operating models is no longer optional — it's critical. The pressures forcing this change are already clear. With FinOps teams growing in both size and cross-functional diversity (61% are now over six people) and AI funding becoming more dynamic (67% of organizations are reallocating internal capital), the rigidity of static, annual project plans has become a primary roadblock to innovation. Without strong FinOps fundamentals — visibility, forecasting, and accountability — organizations risk runaway cloud spend, delayed innovation and diminished stakeholder confidence.

To manage this new reality, teams must operate like product development engines, with defined sprints, clear OKRs, and intense scrutiny on business performance to unlock more agile ways of working and allow funding and resources to track product success in real time. This is where integrating ITSM with TBM becomes critical. The integrated framework provides the real-time visibility needed to track product performance, understand ROI across labor, licenses and infrastructure, and ultimately unlock a more accountable, outcome-driven way of working that closes the gap between strategy and execution.

AI as the Enabler for Real-Time Intelligence

This agile, product-centric model is impossible without an equally agile approach to financial data — one powered by AI. The AI era requires near real-time, integrated financial and operational information to make sound decisions at high speed. AI-powered financial intelligence is the key that eliminates data silos, connecting disparate costs to direct business value and democratizing insight for every user. By pairing this powerful financial insight with agile ways of working, IT leaders and their teams can finally close the confidence-capability gap and take definitive control over their decisions.

The path forward for technology leaders is clear: those who cling to spreadsheets and rigid annual plans will fall behind and become paralyzed when it comes to proving business value. The leaders who will thrive in 2026 and beyond will be those that focus their priorities on building ITFM resilience, shift towards a product-centric mindset, and leverage AI to transform data into strategic insights. By making these changes, IT leaders can close the gap between budget and value, reclaim their role as essential drivers of business innovation, and gain their confidence back for good. 

Eugene Khvostov is Chief Product Officer at Apptio

Hot Topics

The Latest

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...