Skip to main content

IT Leaders Trust AI More Than Ever - Here's What That Means for Operations

Eric Johnson
PagerDuty

Global businesses are riding a new wave of AI-powered innovation to transform IT operations, or ITOps.

Research reveals that more than half of organizations have already deployed AI agents and more than a third are planning to do so. This comes amidst growing executive trust in AI agents as they are increasingly relied on within IT and other business operations.

AI can be a critical part of the IT puzzle by helping to accelerate incident response, reduce downtime and keep customers happy. These gains can shift executive attitudes, as leaders come to see AI agents not just as experimental tools, but as reliable partners in mission-critical situations. It's no surprise, then, that 81% of IT and business executives now trust AI agents to take action during a crisis.

Adding Value for Ambitious Businesses

AI is already having a profound impact on digital operations, helping organizations to innovate faster and work more efficiently. In fact, a recent survey found that 51 % of organizations using AI reported that it had a transformational impact on their operations. AI agents can amplify that further by autonomously executing complex, multi-step tasks, helping to automate entire business processes.

It's part of the reason why we're seeing so many organizations adopt AI agents. In PagerDuty's latest survey, nearly three-quarters of executives (74%) reported that AI has become so essential to operations that they would struggle to function without it. A similar share has already deployed more than one agent. Interestingly, smaller companies seem to be even more reliant on the new technology than their larger peers.

Executives surveyed also revealed that AI is expected to handle as much as a third of their departmental workload in the next 12 months. Many are deploying AI agents for code writing or reviewing, but business processes as diverse as employee onboarding and supply chain optimization could be made more efficient and cost effective through agentic AI.

Challenges Mount

AI adoption is spiking in part because a significant majority of organizations now trust the technology more than they did a year ago, with IT leaders in particular feeling more confident. The improved sentiment stems from leaders observing better-quality outputs and more positive results in practical deployments and pilots.

However, legitimate concerns persist. Organizations are most anxious about outages that may impact their AI systems. 84% of survey respondents reported having experienced at least one outage impacting either internal or external models and tools. A similar share believes their organization needs to improve its ability to detect AI failings to respond to incidents more rapidly.

In many companies, those with AI skills are spread too thin across organizations, meaning fewer experts may be available or on-call to fix issues. Even among those qualified to deal with these incidents, they may find that black box AI systems defy traditional debugging approaches. It's important to remember that many are laboring with siloed incident response/detection systems, which may exclude input from customer support and other functions. Many of these tools aren't designed to monitor complex AI systems with cascading decision layers.

AI Lights a Way Forward

Fortunately, AI can be an important ally as organizations tackle these operational issues. AI embedded into tools can learn from previous incidents to accelerate triage, reduce alert fatigue by minimizing "noise" and review recent changes to proactively surface issues. Generative AI can also add value with automatically generated post-incident reviews for enhanced team learning and with AI-generated runbooks to streamline response. It could also produce timely status updates to keep stakeholders informed of incident developments without impacting first-responder workloads.

Agentic AI can help incident response move even faster, autonomously resolving routine issues so engineers can focus on innovation. This could involve pulling relevant triage data and running diagnostics to make first responders' jobs easier, or recording and sharing incident information for other responders, and even surfacing recommended areas for ongoing improvements.

Predicting and Preventing Failure

The most advanced organizations will use AI to attain a level of operational maturity where AI and automation are used for predictive maintenance and incident prevention. As a result, these organizations can decrease the likelihood of an AI-related system error occurring, helping to ensure customers are happy, services remain uninterrupted and engineers are focused on growth rather than incident response.

It's an aspiration rather than a reality for most enterprises today, but as AI finds its way into more business-critical systems, a preventative approach to ITOps should at least be on the roadmap for teams. A combination of embedded, generative and agentic AI can be key in helping an organization be prepared for the next major outage.

Eric Johnson is Chief Information Officer at PagerDuty

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

IT Leaders Trust AI More Than Ever - Here's What That Means for Operations

Eric Johnson
PagerDuty

Global businesses are riding a new wave of AI-powered innovation to transform IT operations, or ITOps.

Research reveals that more than half of organizations have already deployed AI agents and more than a third are planning to do so. This comes amidst growing executive trust in AI agents as they are increasingly relied on within IT and other business operations.

AI can be a critical part of the IT puzzle by helping to accelerate incident response, reduce downtime and keep customers happy. These gains can shift executive attitudes, as leaders come to see AI agents not just as experimental tools, but as reliable partners in mission-critical situations. It's no surprise, then, that 81% of IT and business executives now trust AI agents to take action during a crisis.

Adding Value for Ambitious Businesses

AI is already having a profound impact on digital operations, helping organizations to innovate faster and work more efficiently. In fact, a recent survey found that 51 % of organizations using AI reported that it had a transformational impact on their operations. AI agents can amplify that further by autonomously executing complex, multi-step tasks, helping to automate entire business processes.

It's part of the reason why we're seeing so many organizations adopt AI agents. In PagerDuty's latest survey, nearly three-quarters of executives (74%) reported that AI has become so essential to operations that they would struggle to function without it. A similar share has already deployed more than one agent. Interestingly, smaller companies seem to be even more reliant on the new technology than their larger peers.

Executives surveyed also revealed that AI is expected to handle as much as a third of their departmental workload in the next 12 months. Many are deploying AI agents for code writing or reviewing, but business processes as diverse as employee onboarding and supply chain optimization could be made more efficient and cost effective through agentic AI.

Challenges Mount

AI adoption is spiking in part because a significant majority of organizations now trust the technology more than they did a year ago, with IT leaders in particular feeling more confident. The improved sentiment stems from leaders observing better-quality outputs and more positive results in practical deployments and pilots.

However, legitimate concerns persist. Organizations are most anxious about outages that may impact their AI systems. 84% of survey respondents reported having experienced at least one outage impacting either internal or external models and tools. A similar share believes their organization needs to improve its ability to detect AI failings to respond to incidents more rapidly.

In many companies, those with AI skills are spread too thin across organizations, meaning fewer experts may be available or on-call to fix issues. Even among those qualified to deal with these incidents, they may find that black box AI systems defy traditional debugging approaches. It's important to remember that many are laboring with siloed incident response/detection systems, which may exclude input from customer support and other functions. Many of these tools aren't designed to monitor complex AI systems with cascading decision layers.

AI Lights a Way Forward

Fortunately, AI can be an important ally as organizations tackle these operational issues. AI embedded into tools can learn from previous incidents to accelerate triage, reduce alert fatigue by minimizing "noise" and review recent changes to proactively surface issues. Generative AI can also add value with automatically generated post-incident reviews for enhanced team learning and with AI-generated runbooks to streamline response. It could also produce timely status updates to keep stakeholders informed of incident developments without impacting first-responder workloads.

Agentic AI can help incident response move even faster, autonomously resolving routine issues so engineers can focus on innovation. This could involve pulling relevant triage data and running diagnostics to make first responders' jobs easier, or recording and sharing incident information for other responders, and even surfacing recommended areas for ongoing improvements.

Predicting and Preventing Failure

The most advanced organizations will use AI to attain a level of operational maturity where AI and automation are used for predictive maintenance and incident prevention. As a result, these organizations can decrease the likelihood of an AI-related system error occurring, helping to ensure customers are happy, services remain uninterrupted and engineers are focused on growth rather than incident response.

It's an aspiration rather than a reality for most enterprises today, but as AI finds its way into more business-critical systems, a preventative approach to ITOps should at least be on the roadmap for teams. A combination of embedded, generative and agentic AI can be key in helping an organization be prepared for the next major outage.

Eric Johnson is Chief Information Officer at PagerDuty

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...