It's an eye opener to see that while companies have implemented service management for the most part — more than 90 percent of companies reporting that they have an IT Service Management system (ITSM) — only 11 percent of companies stated that they have automated the process for organizing their response to IT outages and incidents, according to Everbridge's 2016 State of IT Incident Management report.
This finding is significant because 47 percent of the companies reported having a major IT incident at least 6 times a year, the average cost of downtime is $8,662 per minute, and companies take 27 minutes on average to assemble an IT response team. Automated solutions can reduce this average time to 5 minutes or less. Considering the average cost of $8,662 per minute, the savings realized could be higher than $190,000 per major IT incident.
Key findings from the research include:
Most Companies Have an ITSM or Ticketing System
Over 90 percent of companies reported using an ITSM or ticketing system.
Major IT Outages or Incidents Occur Quite Frequently
47 percent of companies experience a major IT outage or incident six times or more a year.
36 percent experience them close to monthly (11 or more times per year).
More than a quarter of respondents reported that their companies experienced more than 21 incidents last year — that's close to two per month.
Only 9 percent of respondents reported that their organization did not report a major IT outage or incident in the past year.
The most common sources of incidents are network outages (experienced by 61 percent of companies), hardware failure or capacity issues (58 percent), internal business application issues (51 percent ), and unplanned maintenance (41 percent).
Responding to IT Outages and Incidents is Complicated and Too Manual
Two thirds (66 percent) of companies have distributed IT organizations with people spread among multiple locations and multiple time zones.
39 percent have more than 25 people included in their IT response teams. 29 percent have more than 50 people who need to be coordinated to respond to an incident. 16 percent more than 100 people.
43 percent of respondents reported that at least part of their process relies on manually calling and reaching out to people to activate the incident response team. Only 11 percent reported using an IT alerting tool to automate the process. These systems can improve response by reaching people through multiple modalities; use schedules to see who is available; automatically escalate to additional people if designated primary contacts do not respond; automatically organize conference bridges; and provide an audit trail of performance.
Response Times Could be Significantly Reduced by Automation
The mean time to activate and assemble a response team was cited as 27 minutes. Automated solutions can reduce this response time to 5 minutes or less.
IT downtime is expensive and hurts productivity
The average cost of IT downtime was reported as $8,662 per minute.
63 percent of respondents stated that IT incidents or outages hurt employee productivity, 60 percent that it caused IT team disruption or distraction, and 34 percent that it decreased customer satisfaction.
13 percent reported that their organization had experienced bad press or publicity due to an IT incident or outage.
Methodology: The sample for the research was 152 IT professionals, including 86% of respondents from companies of 1000 employees or more, and 45% from companies with more than 10,000 employees.
Organizations use data to fuel their operations, make smart business decisions, improve customer relationships, and much more. Because so much value can be extracted from data its influence is generally positive, but it can also be detrimental to a business experiencing a serious disruption such as a cyberattack, insider threat, or storage platform-specific hack or bug ...
Previously siloed IT teams and technologies are converging as enterprises accelerate their modernization efforts in reaction to COVID-19, according to a study by LogicMonitor ...
You surf the internet, don't you? While all of us are at home due to Covid lock-down and accepting a new reality, the majority of the work is happening online. IT managers are looking for tools that can track the user digital experience. Executives are reading a report from Gartner or Forrester about some of the best networking monitoring solutions available on the market. Project managers are using Microsoft Teams online to communicate and ensure team members are meeting deliverables on time. Remote employees everywhere use OWA to check their office mails. No matter what, you can be quite sure that everyone is using their favorite browser and search engine for connecting online and accomplish tasks ...
With the right solutions, teams can move themselves out of the shadows of error resolution and into the light of innovation. Observability data, drawn from their systems and imbued with context from AI, lets teams automate the issues holding them back. Contextualized data and insights also give them the language to speak to the incremental, product-led approach and the direction to drive key innovations in customer experience improvement. Communicating value becomes a much easier proposition for DevOps practitioners — and they can take their seat at the company table as contributors to value ...
Prediction: Successful organizations will blur (or erase) the line between ITOps and DevOps. DevOps has to coexist with traditional IT operations ... So bring a little DevOps to every aspect of IT operations. You don't even have to call it DevOps ...
The use of unified communications and collaboration (UC&C) solutions has increased since the start of the pandemic, and this increased use has created challenges for IT teams, according to a survey commissioned by NETSCOUT SYSTEMS ...
Cloud-based innovations like microservices, containers and orchestration let developers code better, faster, but the underlying infrastructure becomes dynamic and ephemeral, and service-level interactions are hard to see. It’s a critical evolution, but the rapid change reduces visibility, predictability and control. Hence, observability ...
Companies love data. Aggregating data from multiple sources makes decision-making easier and brings a new depth of the conversation to business meetings. But all of this is at the management level. IT managers and administrators also search for data from multiple sources to ensure that the ecosystem works ...
The cost of poor software quality (CPSQ) in the US in 2020 was approximately $2.08 trillion, according to The Cost of Poor Software Quality In the US: A 2020 Report from the Consortium for Information & Software Quality (CISQ), co-sponsored by Synopsys. This includes poor software quality resulting from software failures, unsuccessful development projects, legacy system problems, technical debt and cybercrime enabled by exploitable weaknesses and vulnerabilities in software ...