Skip to main content

Not All Networks Are Built for the Edge

Julio Petrovitch
NetAlly

From smart factories and autonomous vehicles to real-time analytics and intelligent building systems, the demand for instant, local data processing is exploding. To meet these needs, organizations are leaning into edge computing. The promise? Faster performance, reduced latency and less strain on centralized infrastructure.

But there's a catch: Not every network is ready to support edge deployments. The shift from cloud to edge isn't a silver bullet … it comes with its own set of performance, connectivity and security challenges that can derail return on investment if IT teams aren't prepared. Before rushing into edge, it's worth asking: Is your network actually built for it?

Recent research from IDC shows that global spending on edge computing is expected to reach around $261 billion in 2025. Despite its advantages, edge computing introduces a new layer of complexity. Moving workloads closer to the source doesn't inherently solve latency. Local bottlenecks like Wi-Fi congestion, inefficient routing, and oversubscribed nodes can impact performance. For example, a retail store using edge-based video analytics might run into delays, not because the analytics system is slow, but because the Wi-Fi is overloaded. With numerous devices fighting for bandwidth or a single access point stretched too thin, performance can take a hit. Measuring round-trip latency at the point of deployment is essential to validate that the edge network is delivering on its promise.

Coverage gaps and internal bandwidth limitations also pose risks. Many edge and IoT devices are deployed in low-signal environments (ceilings, walls, utility spaces) where connectivity can be unreliable without precise, location-based testing.

Meanwhile, increased east-west traffic from localized processing can strain internal links that weren't designed for high-volume lateral communication. Imagine a building automation system where sensors are installed behind ceiling tiles or inside utility closets. On paper, the network coverage might look sufficient — but in practice, those materials can block or degrade the signal. Without testing connectivity at the exact device location, these sensors could drop offline or send delayed data, undermining the reliability of the entire system.

The surge in east-west traffic at the edge doesn't just strain network capacity; it also complicates security monitoring. Traditional perimeter defenses and cloud-based firewalls may not see lateral communications between devices. Without continuous visibility and anomaly detection, malicious activity can blend in with normal machine-to-machine chatter.

Beyond performance and reliability, security must be front and center. Every new sensor, kiosk, or edge server adds another potential entry point for attackers. Unlike data centers and company HQs with hardened perimeters, edge devices are often deployed in uncontrolled environments like retail floors, factory lines, or remote offices where they may be more vulnerable to physical tampering. Centralized monitoring technologies like Endpoint Detection and Response are less effective at the network edge, so the risk of rogue access points or unsecured ports is higher. Malicious activity or unusual network behavior will be harder to detect. Finally, edge devices themselves often use outdated operating systems and basic software with many security flaws.

Maximizing the value of edge computing starts with proactive planning and rigorous validation. That begins by measuring latency before and after deployment — not just at the network level, but for each specific application and service. Round-trip testing and packet analysis can confirm whether devices are reliably connecting with intended endpoints and performing within acceptable thresholds.

General proximity is not enough when it comes to wireless coverage, it must be assessed at the physical device location. Research from 2024 confirms that signal strength can deteriorate dramatically with just a few meters of distance or light obstruction. The study, measuring Wi-Fi signal quality from 1 meter to 15 meters from a router, found a significant drop in signal strength and data speed as distance increased, with performance further degraded by walls, furniture, and other obstructions — as would be expected. For instance, imagine a smart sensor mounted in a warehouse ceiling. On a map, it's well within range of the nearest access point, but thick steel rafters and high shelving panels obstruct the Wi-Fi path. At that exact location, signal strength can fall below usable thresholds, causing intermittent dropouts or delayed transmissions that wouldn't be caught unless measured in proximity to the sensor itself.

It's also important that signal quality and load testing simulate real-world conditions to ensure infrastructure can handle demand as deployments scale. With east-west (internal, device-to-device) traffic increasing, IT teams should test throughput across switch-to-switch and access-layer connections. At the same time, north-south (external, device-to-cloud) traffic should be validated to confirm critical applications can reliably reach data center and cloud services. Together, these tests ensure both internal and external paths can support elevated loads without introducing bottlenecks.

Edge computing can unlock significant performance gains, reduce latency, and shift compute load from centralized infrastructure — but only when the underlying network is both performance-ready and secure. Success depends on more than shifting workloads closer to devices. It requires deliberate testing, full visibility, and cross-functional coordination. By validating latency, assessing wireless coverage, stress-testing both east-west and north-south links, and securing every endpoint, IT leaders can avoid common pitfalls and deliver the reliability, responsiveness, and protection their users expect.

Julio Petrovitch is a Product Manager at NetAlly

The Latest

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Not All Networks Are Built for the Edge

Julio Petrovitch
NetAlly

From smart factories and autonomous vehicles to real-time analytics and intelligent building systems, the demand for instant, local data processing is exploding. To meet these needs, organizations are leaning into edge computing. The promise? Faster performance, reduced latency and less strain on centralized infrastructure.

But there's a catch: Not every network is ready to support edge deployments. The shift from cloud to edge isn't a silver bullet … it comes with its own set of performance, connectivity and security challenges that can derail return on investment if IT teams aren't prepared. Before rushing into edge, it's worth asking: Is your network actually built for it?

Recent research from IDC shows that global spending on edge computing is expected to reach around $261 billion in 2025. Despite its advantages, edge computing introduces a new layer of complexity. Moving workloads closer to the source doesn't inherently solve latency. Local bottlenecks like Wi-Fi congestion, inefficient routing, and oversubscribed nodes can impact performance. For example, a retail store using edge-based video analytics might run into delays, not because the analytics system is slow, but because the Wi-Fi is overloaded. With numerous devices fighting for bandwidth or a single access point stretched too thin, performance can take a hit. Measuring round-trip latency at the point of deployment is essential to validate that the edge network is delivering on its promise.

Coverage gaps and internal bandwidth limitations also pose risks. Many edge and IoT devices are deployed in low-signal environments (ceilings, walls, utility spaces) where connectivity can be unreliable without precise, location-based testing.

Meanwhile, increased east-west traffic from localized processing can strain internal links that weren't designed for high-volume lateral communication. Imagine a building automation system where sensors are installed behind ceiling tiles or inside utility closets. On paper, the network coverage might look sufficient — but in practice, those materials can block or degrade the signal. Without testing connectivity at the exact device location, these sensors could drop offline or send delayed data, undermining the reliability of the entire system.

The surge in east-west traffic at the edge doesn't just strain network capacity; it also complicates security monitoring. Traditional perimeter defenses and cloud-based firewalls may not see lateral communications between devices. Without continuous visibility and anomaly detection, malicious activity can blend in with normal machine-to-machine chatter.

Beyond performance and reliability, security must be front and center. Every new sensor, kiosk, or edge server adds another potential entry point for attackers. Unlike data centers and company HQs with hardened perimeters, edge devices are often deployed in uncontrolled environments like retail floors, factory lines, or remote offices where they may be more vulnerable to physical tampering. Centralized monitoring technologies like Endpoint Detection and Response are less effective at the network edge, so the risk of rogue access points or unsecured ports is higher. Malicious activity or unusual network behavior will be harder to detect. Finally, edge devices themselves often use outdated operating systems and basic software with many security flaws.

Maximizing the value of edge computing starts with proactive planning and rigorous validation. That begins by measuring latency before and after deployment — not just at the network level, but for each specific application and service. Round-trip testing and packet analysis can confirm whether devices are reliably connecting with intended endpoints and performing within acceptable thresholds.

General proximity is not enough when it comes to wireless coverage, it must be assessed at the physical device location. Research from 2024 confirms that signal strength can deteriorate dramatically with just a few meters of distance or light obstruction. The study, measuring Wi-Fi signal quality from 1 meter to 15 meters from a router, found a significant drop in signal strength and data speed as distance increased, with performance further degraded by walls, furniture, and other obstructions — as would be expected. For instance, imagine a smart sensor mounted in a warehouse ceiling. On a map, it's well within range of the nearest access point, but thick steel rafters and high shelving panels obstruct the Wi-Fi path. At that exact location, signal strength can fall below usable thresholds, causing intermittent dropouts or delayed transmissions that wouldn't be caught unless measured in proximity to the sensor itself.

It's also important that signal quality and load testing simulate real-world conditions to ensure infrastructure can handle demand as deployments scale. With east-west (internal, device-to-device) traffic increasing, IT teams should test throughput across switch-to-switch and access-layer connections. At the same time, north-south (external, device-to-cloud) traffic should be validated to confirm critical applications can reliably reach data center and cloud services. Together, these tests ensure both internal and external paths can support elevated loads without introducing bottlenecks.

Edge computing can unlock significant performance gains, reduce latency, and shift compute load from centralized infrastructure — but only when the underlying network is both performance-ready and secure. Success depends on more than shifting workloads closer to devices. It requires deliberate testing, full visibility, and cross-functional coordination. By validating latency, assessing wireless coverage, stress-testing both east-west and north-south links, and securing every endpoint, IT leaders can avoid common pitfalls and deliver the reliability, responsiveness, and protection their users expect.

Julio Petrovitch is a Product Manager at NetAlly

The Latest

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...