Skip to main content

Only 34% of AI Professionals Feel Fully Equipped to Meet Business Goals

Organizations continue to struggle to generate business value with AI. Despite increased investments in AI, only 34% of AI professionals feel fully equipped with the tools necessary to meet their organization's AI goals, according to The Unmet AI Needs Survey conducted by DataRobot.

The survey included over 700 AI practitioners and leaders from a range of business sizes and AI maturity levels. It uncovered 50 pain points facing AI teams today across four major themes:

1. Monitoring and Observability (45%)

Respondents cited difficulties ensuring the reliability and consistency of their models, even in mature AI organizations. Monitoring outputs in real-time and ensuring dependable performance remain a significant concern.

2 Generative AI Development and Deployment (35%)

Respondents struggle with building generative AI application interfaces and setting up application hosting. Respondents pointed to unclear expectations for generative AI outputs and the need to simplify prototyping.

3 Implementation and Integration (27%)

Respondents expressed frustration over delays between team handoffs and deployment due to complex integrations of diverse toolsets and excessive time spent troubleshooting systems that are not fully interoperable. This was especially true with organizations using AI solutions from hyperscalers.

4. Collaboration (20%)

With multiple roles involved in AI development, respondents identified fragmented workflows and cross-department handoffs as major obstacles to delivering AI projects from concept to production.

Additional findings

Additional findings revealed a growing confidence gap amid the convergence of predictive and generative AI:

■ 90% believe predictive and generative AI will converge in the next 12 months. 92% expect their roles to include both predictive and generative AI in that rapid timeframe — creating future risks around collaboration and integration bottlenecks for AI teams.

■ 71% of respondents expressed a lack of confidence in developing and delivering effective AI solutions, while only 34% feel extremely confident they have the necessary tools to meet their business objectives.

■ 53% want tools that allow them to work in a code and GUI environment simultaneously, providing flexibility, ensuring more efficient workflows, and enabling collaboration.

■ 57% of respondents want vendors to provide best practices for developing and deploying AI solutions, and 49% are seeking out-of-the-box approaches that balance heavy-lifting with the ability for bespoke customization.

"The data is clear: there is a widening gap between current tooling and what practitioners need to feel confident in AI outputs. Despite billions of dollars poured into AI, outcomes have been inconsistent," said Michael Schmidt, CTO, DataRobot. "As existing and emergent AI use cases are converging, there's a growing demand for a new approach — one that includes workflows, guardrails, and components tailored to the use-case data and requirements. Addressing the obstacles AI practitioners face is essential to achieving the results businesses expect from AI."

Methodology: DataRobot in partnership with F'inn surveyed nearly 700 AI practitioners and AI leaders worldwide using a combination of qualitative and quantitative research. The survey captured feedback from a wide range of roles and seniority levels — Data Scientists, ML Engineers, DevOps, IT professionals, and more — across organizations at various stages of AI maturity.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Many organizations assumed their infrastructure strategy was settled. It had been implemented, optimized and built into long-term plans. Recent changes in technology and vendor consolidation are forcing a second look. Cloud outages and licensing changes have exposed how much dependency exists on a small number of platforms. As a result, organizations are reevaluating whether those decisions still hold up under current conditions ...

Edge AI is strategically embedded in core IT and infrastructure spending across industries, according to the 2026 Edge AI Survey from ZEDEDA. The research shows that 83% of C-suite and IT executive respondents say edge AI is important to their core business strategy ...

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

Only 34% of AI Professionals Feel Fully Equipped to Meet Business Goals

Organizations continue to struggle to generate business value with AI. Despite increased investments in AI, only 34% of AI professionals feel fully equipped with the tools necessary to meet their organization's AI goals, according to The Unmet AI Needs Survey conducted by DataRobot.

The survey included over 700 AI practitioners and leaders from a range of business sizes and AI maturity levels. It uncovered 50 pain points facing AI teams today across four major themes:

1. Monitoring and Observability (45%)

Respondents cited difficulties ensuring the reliability and consistency of their models, even in mature AI organizations. Monitoring outputs in real-time and ensuring dependable performance remain a significant concern.

2 Generative AI Development and Deployment (35%)

Respondents struggle with building generative AI application interfaces and setting up application hosting. Respondents pointed to unclear expectations for generative AI outputs and the need to simplify prototyping.

3 Implementation and Integration (27%)

Respondents expressed frustration over delays between team handoffs and deployment due to complex integrations of diverse toolsets and excessive time spent troubleshooting systems that are not fully interoperable. This was especially true with organizations using AI solutions from hyperscalers.

4. Collaboration (20%)

With multiple roles involved in AI development, respondents identified fragmented workflows and cross-department handoffs as major obstacles to delivering AI projects from concept to production.

Additional findings

Additional findings revealed a growing confidence gap amid the convergence of predictive and generative AI:

■ 90% believe predictive and generative AI will converge in the next 12 months. 92% expect their roles to include both predictive and generative AI in that rapid timeframe — creating future risks around collaboration and integration bottlenecks for AI teams.

■ 71% of respondents expressed a lack of confidence in developing and delivering effective AI solutions, while only 34% feel extremely confident they have the necessary tools to meet their business objectives.

■ 53% want tools that allow them to work in a code and GUI environment simultaneously, providing flexibility, ensuring more efficient workflows, and enabling collaboration.

■ 57% of respondents want vendors to provide best practices for developing and deploying AI solutions, and 49% are seeking out-of-the-box approaches that balance heavy-lifting with the ability for bespoke customization.

"The data is clear: there is a widening gap between current tooling and what practitioners need to feel confident in AI outputs. Despite billions of dollars poured into AI, outcomes have been inconsistent," said Michael Schmidt, CTO, DataRobot. "As existing and emergent AI use cases are converging, there's a growing demand for a new approach — one that includes workflows, guardrails, and components tailored to the use-case data and requirements. Addressing the obstacles AI practitioners face is essential to achieving the results businesses expect from AI."

Methodology: DataRobot in partnership with F'inn surveyed nearly 700 AI practitioners and AI leaders worldwide using a combination of qualitative and quantitative research. The survey captured feedback from a wide range of roles and seniority levels — Data Scientists, ML Engineers, DevOps, IT professionals, and more — across organizations at various stages of AI maturity.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Many organizations assumed their infrastructure strategy was settled. It had been implemented, optimized and built into long-term plans. Recent changes in technology and vendor consolidation are forcing a second look. Cloud outages and licensing changes have exposed how much dependency exists on a small number of platforms. As a result, organizations are reevaluating whether those decisions still hold up under current conditions ...

Edge AI is strategically embedded in core IT and infrastructure spending across industries, according to the 2026 Edge AI Survey from ZEDEDA. The research shows that 83% of C-suite and IT executive respondents say edge AI is important to their core business strategy ...

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...