Skip to main content

OpsCruise Integrates with AWS

OpsCruise announced a new serverless observability extension that provides real-time visibility and control to popular AWS Serverless functions.

As part of its serverless observability offering, OpsCruise monitors multiple cloud components in the AWS cloud, such as Lambda functions, API Gateways, SQS queues, ECS containers, Kinesis streams, and DynamoDB tables. This will enable DevOps, platform engineers and cloud architects team to have more visibility to detect problems across application components, Kubernetes and the supporting infrastructure before users are impacted.

“Traditional monitoring solutions rely on collecting metrics and custom distributed tracing to track service requests to and from the serverless components. Unfortunately, the burden of detecting and understanding problems is left as a DIY offline exercise for the engineers,” said Scott Fulton, Co-Founder and CEO of OpsCruise. “In contrast, OpsCruise enhances the visualization of the dynamic topology and state of applications, and also extends its automated and predictive ML and AI capabilities to serverless components as well.”

Beyond simply monitoring errors or throttles, OpsCruise has adapted its behavior based modeling to predictively detect problems in the serverless component in real-time. These predictive models can also be used for fault isolation and causal analysis by understanding if the serverless component is misconfigured to handle the volume of requests, for example from an API Gateway or a Kinesis trigger, or if the downstream DynamoDB data store is underprovisioned.

As part of its serverless observability offering, OpsCruise monitors multiple cloud components in the AWS cloud, such as Lambda functions, API Gateways, SQS queues, ECS containers, Kinesis streams, and DynamoDB tables.

OpsCruise is available through the AWS Marketplace as part of your standard AWS billing as well as through a Free Forever plan where customers can start immediately - no credit card or contract commitment necessary.

The Latest

IT organizations have historically measured success by how quickly they can respond when something goes wrong. The entire discipline of Incident Management has been optimized around mean time to resolution, first-response SLAs and ticket closure rates. But new research suggests that even though this is a well-executed playbook, it's no longer enough to retain customers ...

Production incidents rarely announce themselves as database problems. They appear as slow transactions, timeouts, rising response times, or an application struggling under a workload it previously handled. APM provides an essential starting point. It can identify a slow transaction path, highlight an affected service, and show that a database dependency is consuming more time than expected. But identifying the database as part of the problem is not the same as explaining what is happening inside it ...

Cloud teams are under constant pressure to reduce spend without slowing development or increasing operational risk. They are deploying autoscalers, rightsizing workloads, enforcing resource requests, reviewing utilization dashboards, and building FinOps processes around cloud-native environments. Yet the results often disappoint ...

Ask most IT leaders about their biggest concern with AI and you'll hear the same answer: hallucinations ... Today, however, the conversation has shifted ... As organizations move beyond chatbots and experiments, they are increasingly deploying AI agents that perform multi-step tasks. These systems retrieve documents, query databases, call APIs, generate reports, write code, and make recommendations. The issue is not whether the model can reason. The issue is whether the organization can see, verify, and govern the decisions being made along the way ...

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

OpsCruise Integrates with AWS

OpsCruise announced a new serverless observability extension that provides real-time visibility and control to popular AWS Serverless functions.

As part of its serverless observability offering, OpsCruise monitors multiple cloud components in the AWS cloud, such as Lambda functions, API Gateways, SQS queues, ECS containers, Kinesis streams, and DynamoDB tables. This will enable DevOps, platform engineers and cloud architects team to have more visibility to detect problems across application components, Kubernetes and the supporting infrastructure before users are impacted.

“Traditional monitoring solutions rely on collecting metrics and custom distributed tracing to track service requests to and from the serverless components. Unfortunately, the burden of detecting and understanding problems is left as a DIY offline exercise for the engineers,” said Scott Fulton, Co-Founder and CEO of OpsCruise. “In contrast, OpsCruise enhances the visualization of the dynamic topology and state of applications, and also extends its automated and predictive ML and AI capabilities to serverless components as well.”

Beyond simply monitoring errors or throttles, OpsCruise has adapted its behavior based modeling to predictively detect problems in the serverless component in real-time. These predictive models can also be used for fault isolation and causal analysis by understanding if the serverless component is misconfigured to handle the volume of requests, for example from an API Gateway or a Kinesis trigger, or if the downstream DynamoDB data store is underprovisioned.

As part of its serverless observability offering, OpsCruise monitors multiple cloud components in the AWS cloud, such as Lambda functions, API Gateways, SQS queues, ECS containers, Kinesis streams, and DynamoDB tables.

OpsCruise is available through the AWS Marketplace as part of your standard AWS billing as well as through a Free Forever plan where customers can start immediately - no credit card or contract commitment necessary.

The Latest

IT organizations have historically measured success by how quickly they can respond when something goes wrong. The entire discipline of Incident Management has been optimized around mean time to resolution, first-response SLAs and ticket closure rates. But new research suggests that even though this is a well-executed playbook, it's no longer enough to retain customers ...

Production incidents rarely announce themselves as database problems. They appear as slow transactions, timeouts, rising response times, or an application struggling under a workload it previously handled. APM provides an essential starting point. It can identify a slow transaction path, highlight an affected service, and show that a database dependency is consuming more time than expected. But identifying the database as part of the problem is not the same as explaining what is happening inside it ...

Cloud teams are under constant pressure to reduce spend without slowing development or increasing operational risk. They are deploying autoscalers, rightsizing workloads, enforcing resource requests, reviewing utilization dashboards, and building FinOps processes around cloud-native environments. Yet the results often disappoint ...

Ask most IT leaders about their biggest concern with AI and you'll hear the same answer: hallucinations ... Today, however, the conversation has shifted ... As organizations move beyond chatbots and experiments, they are increasingly deploying AI agents that perform multi-step tasks. These systems retrieve documents, query databases, call APIs, generate reports, write code, and make recommendations. The issue is not whether the model can reason. The issue is whether the organization can see, verify, and govern the decisions being made along the way ...

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...