The Path to Technojoy: How to Tackle the Silent Drivers of Technostress

Jon Mort
The Adaptavist Group

Technology's role in the workplace has expanded rapidly, framing how we work and communicate. Now, with the explosion of new and innovative AI-driven tools, people are struggling to navigate how to work in this new emergent era. And although the majority of these applications are designed to make our lives easier, for many knowledge workers, they've become a source of stress and anxiety. "Technostress," a term coined by psychoanalyst Craig Brod in 1984, describes the feelings of being overwhelmed by constant connectivity and cognitive overload from information and notifications, and it's on the rise.

Adaptavist's latest report The human cost of digital transformation, helps paint a more detailed picture. Over the last year, 64% of workers said technology had negatively impacted their lives at work, revealing how deeply embedded technostress has become in our professional lives. Nearly 1 in 3 people pointed to the volume of notifications or the burden of using multiple platforms as key stress drivers.

The sheer scale of this challenge means the consequences extend beyond individual well-being. Technostress is also having a measurable impact on global productivity; Gallup reports that declining employee engagement in 2024 may have cost the global economy as much as $438 billion in lost productivity.

The data suggest that the organizations suffering most are those with poor tool implementation, inadequate training, and weak workplace cultures. So, plotting the path to technojoy (the antidote to technostress) begins with understanding the real needs of your workforce, implementing proper tool training and creating a culture where feedback is not only encouraged but implemented. Organizations that prioritize these elements are seeing their employees embrace technology as an enabler of success, not a burden.

Meanwhile, failure to do so opens businesses up to a workforce increasingly plagued by sickness leave, absenteeism, and high turnover rates.

What's Causing Technostress?

Today's workplaces are defined by digital communication, constant connectivity, and the rise of AI tools. Face-to-face conversations have been replaced by online messages, where tone and intent is harder to read. Employees are juggling meetings and notifications across countless platforms, and are often feeling the pressure to stay connected outside of work hours. One in five workers said messages from colleagues make them feel excluded or incompetent, and a further 28% worried that their tone is easily misinterpreted in online interactions. Together, all these factors create the perfect breeding ground for technostress.

One major driver is insufficient training. With organizations finding their feet as early adopters of these new tools, a fifth of knowledge workers said a lack of guidance on new tools heightens their stress, forcing them to learn through trial and error.

Fueling anxiety and workplace pressure, these demands can be detrimental to employees' mental health and, therefore, workplace relationships and engagement. In fact, a recent study by AI note-taking tool Notta revealed that as many as 42% of workers felt that poor communication affected cross-functional collaboration, suggesting that when tools create friction, it can lead to confusion, anxiety, and a gradual breakdown of team cohesion.

The Symptoms of Technostress

As they play out at work, these shifts are leading to new challenges. Technostress doesn't just affect mental well-being; it can manifest physically, too, with research linking it to headaches, eye strain and a disrupted sleep pattern. Over time, these symptoms can transform into mental fatigue, frustration, and disengagement at work.

The business impact is equally significant. In fact, technostress has become a silent productivity killer, with studies showing employees lose the equivalent of a full working day every month due to dissatisfaction at work, leading to mental disengagement and disempowerment. A blind spot for many leaders is their underestimation of how technology affects employee experience and well-being. Workers feeling overwhelmed by technology are more likely to switch off, underperform, or quietly look for new roles.

These effects are already visible. Around 23% of knowledge workers looked for a new job in the last 12 months, while 12% have taken sick leave or time off work due to technology-related stress. 5% even quit their roles entirely. Given that there are over one billion knowledge workers globally (Gartner), this could translate to 50 million resignations and 120 million job searches each year, an alarming sign of how unchecked technostress could fuel a mass exodus of workers.

What Determines This Impact

The extent to which organizations are affected depends largely on factors like employee happiness, workplace culture, and access to proper training and support. When employees feel supported and energized by their work environment, they report an overwhelmingly positive experience with technology.

60% of workers who said they were supported by a positive workplace culture reported that technology had significantly supported their career advancement and, consequently, improved their satisfaction at work. More than 90% also said that their team integrated technology effectively into collaborative work..

Ultimately, technology alone doesn't solve problems; people do. Without the right structures, digital tools can overwhelm rather than empower. But with the right culture in place, technology becomes what it's meant to be: a catalyst for better work, not the cause of stress and burnout.

Practical Steps Towards Technojoy

If technostress thrives amid poor technology implementation, lack of training, and unsupportive cultures, then technojoy - a positive, empowering relationship with technology at work - comes from flipping that script.

1. Focus on change management, not just technology

Technology rollouts rarely fail because of the tools themselves; they fail because of poor understanding of the problems they are supposed to solve and of the needs of the people who are destined to use them. The organizations that avoid burnout and disengagement look beyond software selection to the people using it, diving deep into their needs and priorities.

Partnering with experts who understand the human side of digital transformation helps preserve employee autonomy and build supportive cultures where technology empowers rather than overwhelms.

2. Build a supportive, feedback-driven culture that involves employees in decisions

The report revealed that workers prioritize support and empowerment far more than a reduction in the number of tools. When asked what actions their organizations should take to ensure workplace technologies enable rather than frustrate, almost 50% listed ‘a culture where people are comfortable asking for help' as a top-three priority.

Creating that culture starts by involving employees in decision-making, whether selecting tools, designing workflows, or shaping training programs. Understanding their daily challenges before rolling out new solutions and trusting them to decide how best to use technology in their roles builds ownership, in turn, building confidence.

3. Invest in training, support, and resources

Confidence comes through capability. Yet the report reveals that 43% of employees say they need more training, technical support, and access to dedicated learning resources.

Comprehensive onboarding, refresher sessions, and accessible help channels ensure teams don't just use tools but can start to master them by understanding how to best use them in their own personal work context. The key is reinforcing that satisfaction with work isn't about the technology itself but how supported employees feel in using it.

4. Continuously evaluate tools and platforms

Technology and workplace needs evolve constantly and quickly, so should your approach. Regularly assess whether tools are genuinely improving productivity, connection, and well-being, and whether the cumulative effect of using multiple tools is helping or hindering. Ongoing evaluation ensures technology continues to serve its purpose: enabling people to use technology and tools to work smarter, not harder.

Technostress isn't an inevitable side effect of modern work; it's a sign that something in our approach needs to change. The data shows that when people feel supported, well-trained, and understood, technology becomes an enabler, not an obstacle. 

Jon Mort is CTO of The Adaptavist Group

Related Links

Hot Topics

The Latest

Why Cloud Reliability Comes Down to People and How to Improve It

Cloud outages are usually described as technical failures. When a service goes down, a dependency breaks, or a region has issues, the focus immediately shifts to infrastructure. But if you look closely at how these incidents actually unfold, the root cause is rarely the technology itself. It is almost always tied to decisions made earlier, during design, implementation, or day-to-day operations. The system behaves the way it was built. The real question is how it was built ...

Why IT Keeps Getting Handed an AI Training Problem It Can't Solve Alone

77% of leaders say their teams need AI skills urgently. 64% say their organization plans to train current employees rather than hire new ones. So far, so reasonable. The part that surprised me is who's been put in charge: 34% of those leaders say IT and engineering own the AI skills mandate. Learning and Development or HR own it at 7% of organizations. That's roughly five-to-one in favor of the people who understand the tools, over the people whose actual job is teaching adults how to learn new ones ...

Bringing IBM i Into the Modern Observability Stack: The Missing Piece of Enterprise AIOps

In the ever-evolving digital landscape, enterprises are increasingly focused on enhancing their observability stacks to gain deeper insights into their IT environments. Observability has become a cornerstone of modern IT operations, enabling organizations to monitor, diagnose, and optimize their systems with unprecedented precision. However, a critical piece of the puzzle often goes unnoticed in this transformation: IBM i ...

89% of Frontend Teams Use AI in Their Workflows, but Few Use It for Observability

We just surveyed 300 frontend and mobile engineers across 16 countries, and the finding that keeps sticking with me isn't the one about AI. It's this: 74% of engineering teams rate themselves in the "middle" of the observability maturity scale. Not reactive, not strategic. Stuck in the middle. They have dashboards, they have tracing, they have alerts. And yet when something goes wrong, they still can't tell you why ...

MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Podcast - Episode 25: AI's Impact on WAN

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 25, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses  AI's impact on the Wide Area Network (WAN) ... 

6 Signs Your APM Dashboard Looks Healthy but Your App Is Not

Application performance monitoring (APM) dashboards are only as useful as what they are configured to measure. The default setup covers obvious failure modes such as downtime, error spikes, and latency breaches, but it does not cover everything. Some failures produce no alerts or anomalies. The dashboard stays green while users experience a broken product. Here are six signs that is happening ...

AI Innovation Was the First Phase. Governance and Accountability Are the Next ...

The race to deploy AI is largely over. Most enterprises have entered it. The question now is not whether artificial intelligence is running inside the organization. The question is whether anyone is genuinely responsible for what it does. That is not a technical question. It is a leadership one. And most organizations are not yet structured to answer it honestly ...

Your AI Agent's Biggest Problem Isn't the Model - It's the Data

A new analysis of 250 real-world queries across common retail tasks, such as product pricing, availability, ratings, shipping and specifications, reveals systemic inefficiency at the heart of web-based AI agents. On average, 97.9% of the data retrieved by agents from live web pages is irrelevant to the query being answered. Specifically, the average page ingested ran nearly 9,000 characters, while the average answer was just 32 characters, resulting in a noise-to-signal ratio of 278:1. Price queries were the most extreme outlier, with noise rates approaching 99.5%. That's not a rounding error. That's a structural problem ...

Observability Is the New Control Plane for Enterprise Transformation

The enterprises that will define the next decade are not the ones that deployed the most technology. They are the ones who understood what their technology was actually doing. That distinction is not a philosophical point. It is the central operational challenge facing every organization that has spent the last five years modernizing at speed ...

When AI Becomes the Corporate OS

AI is becoming the operating system of the enterprise. It acts as an invisible coordination layer that understands intent, connects systems, and executes work across complex SaaS environments. Previously, employees had to click through multiple systems — CRM, ERP, support tools, collaboration platforms — to complete a single task. Now, instead of navigating each application manually, they can simply state what they need to accomplish ...

The Path to Technojoy: How to Tackle the Silent Drivers of Technostress

Jon Mort
The Adaptavist Group

Technology's role in the workplace has expanded rapidly, framing how we work and communicate. Now, with the explosion of new and innovative AI-driven tools, people are struggling to navigate how to work in this new emergent era. And although the majority of these applications are designed to make our lives easier, for many knowledge workers, they've become a source of stress and anxiety. "Technostress," a term coined by psychoanalyst Craig Brod in 1984, describes the feelings of being overwhelmed by constant connectivity and cognitive overload from information and notifications, and it's on the rise.

Adaptavist's latest report The human cost of digital transformation, helps paint a more detailed picture. Over the last year, 64% of workers said technology had negatively impacted their lives at work, revealing how deeply embedded technostress has become in our professional lives. Nearly 1 in 3 people pointed to the volume of notifications or the burden of using multiple platforms as key stress drivers.

The sheer scale of this challenge means the consequences extend beyond individual well-being. Technostress is also having a measurable impact on global productivity; Gallup reports that declining employee engagement in 2024 may have cost the global economy as much as $438 billion in lost productivity.

The data suggest that the organizations suffering most are those with poor tool implementation, inadequate training, and weak workplace cultures. So, plotting the path to technojoy (the antidote to technostress) begins with understanding the real needs of your workforce, implementing proper tool training and creating a culture where feedback is not only encouraged but implemented. Organizations that prioritize these elements are seeing their employees embrace technology as an enabler of success, not a burden.

Meanwhile, failure to do so opens businesses up to a workforce increasingly plagued by sickness leave, absenteeism, and high turnover rates.

What's Causing Technostress?

Today's workplaces are defined by digital communication, constant connectivity, and the rise of AI tools. Face-to-face conversations have been replaced by online messages, where tone and intent is harder to read. Employees are juggling meetings and notifications across countless platforms, and are often feeling the pressure to stay connected outside of work hours. One in five workers said messages from colleagues make them feel excluded or incompetent, and a further 28% worried that their tone is easily misinterpreted in online interactions. Together, all these factors create the perfect breeding ground for technostress.

One major driver is insufficient training. With organizations finding their feet as early adopters of these new tools, a fifth of knowledge workers said a lack of guidance on new tools heightens their stress, forcing them to learn through trial and error.

Fueling anxiety and workplace pressure, these demands can be detrimental to employees' mental health and, therefore, workplace relationships and engagement. In fact, a recent study by AI note-taking tool Notta revealed that as many as 42% of workers felt that poor communication affected cross-functional collaboration, suggesting that when tools create friction, it can lead to confusion, anxiety, and a gradual breakdown of team cohesion.

The Symptoms of Technostress

As they play out at work, these shifts are leading to new challenges. Technostress doesn't just affect mental well-being; it can manifest physically, too, with research linking it to headaches, eye strain and a disrupted sleep pattern. Over time, these symptoms can transform into mental fatigue, frustration, and disengagement at work.

The business impact is equally significant. In fact, technostress has become a silent productivity killer, with studies showing employees lose the equivalent of a full working day every month due to dissatisfaction at work, leading to mental disengagement and disempowerment. A blind spot for many leaders is their underestimation of how technology affects employee experience and well-being. Workers feeling overwhelmed by technology are more likely to switch off, underperform, or quietly look for new roles.

These effects are already visible. Around 23% of knowledge workers looked for a new job in the last 12 months, while 12% have taken sick leave or time off work due to technology-related stress. 5% even quit their roles entirely. Given that there are over one billion knowledge workers globally (Gartner), this could translate to 50 million resignations and 120 million job searches each year, an alarming sign of how unchecked technostress could fuel a mass exodus of workers.

What Determines This Impact

The extent to which organizations are affected depends largely on factors like employee happiness, workplace culture, and access to proper training and support. When employees feel supported and energized by their work environment, they report an overwhelmingly positive experience with technology.

60% of workers who said they were supported by a positive workplace culture reported that technology had significantly supported their career advancement and, consequently, improved their satisfaction at work. More than 90% also said that their team integrated technology effectively into collaborative work..

Ultimately, technology alone doesn't solve problems; people do. Without the right structures, digital tools can overwhelm rather than empower. But with the right culture in place, technology becomes what it's meant to be: a catalyst for better work, not the cause of stress and burnout.

Practical Steps Towards Technojoy

If technostress thrives amid poor technology implementation, lack of training, and unsupportive cultures, then technojoy - a positive, empowering relationship with technology at work - comes from flipping that script.

1. Focus on change management, not just technology

Technology rollouts rarely fail because of the tools themselves; they fail because of poor understanding of the problems they are supposed to solve and of the needs of the people who are destined to use them. The organizations that avoid burnout and disengagement look beyond software selection to the people using it, diving deep into their needs and priorities.

Partnering with experts who understand the human side of digital transformation helps preserve employee autonomy and build supportive cultures where technology empowers rather than overwhelms.

2. Build a supportive, feedback-driven culture that involves employees in decisions

The report revealed that workers prioritize support and empowerment far more than a reduction in the number of tools. When asked what actions their organizations should take to ensure workplace technologies enable rather than frustrate, almost 50% listed ‘a culture where people are comfortable asking for help' as a top-three priority.

Creating that culture starts by involving employees in decision-making, whether selecting tools, designing workflows, or shaping training programs. Understanding their daily challenges before rolling out new solutions and trusting them to decide how best to use technology in their roles builds ownership, in turn, building confidence.

3. Invest in training, support, and resources

Confidence comes through capability. Yet the report reveals that 43% of employees say they need more training, technical support, and access to dedicated learning resources.

Comprehensive onboarding, refresher sessions, and accessible help channels ensure teams don't just use tools but can start to master them by understanding how to best use them in their own personal work context. The key is reinforcing that satisfaction with work isn't about the technology itself but how supported employees feel in using it.

4. Continuously evaluate tools and platforms

Technology and workplace needs evolve constantly and quickly, so should your approach. Regularly assess whether tools are genuinely improving productivity, connection, and well-being, and whether the cumulative effect of using multiple tools is helping or hindering. Ongoing evaluation ensures technology continues to serve its purpose: enabling people to use technology and tools to work smarter, not harder.

Technostress isn't an inevitable side effect of modern work; it's a sign that something in our approach needs to change. The data shows that when people feel supported, well-trained, and understood, technology becomes an enabler, not an obstacle. 

Jon Mort is CTO of The Adaptavist Group

Related Links

Hot Topics

The Latest

Why Cloud Reliability Comes Down to People and How to Improve It

Cloud outages are usually described as technical failures. When a service goes down, a dependency breaks, or a region has issues, the focus immediately shifts to infrastructure. But if you look closely at how these incidents actually unfold, the root cause is rarely the technology itself. It is almost always tied to decisions made earlier, during design, implementation, or day-to-day operations. The system behaves the way it was built. The real question is how it was built ...

Why IT Keeps Getting Handed an AI Training Problem It Can't Solve Alone

77% of leaders say their teams need AI skills urgently. 64% say their organization plans to train current employees rather than hire new ones. So far, so reasonable. The part that surprised me is who's been put in charge: 34% of those leaders say IT and engineering own the AI skills mandate. Learning and Development or HR own it at 7% of organizations. That's roughly five-to-one in favor of the people who understand the tools, over the people whose actual job is teaching adults how to learn new ones ...

Bringing IBM i Into the Modern Observability Stack: The Missing Piece of Enterprise AIOps

In the ever-evolving digital landscape, enterprises are increasingly focused on enhancing their observability stacks to gain deeper insights into their IT environments. Observability has become a cornerstone of modern IT operations, enabling organizations to monitor, diagnose, and optimize their systems with unprecedented precision. However, a critical piece of the puzzle often goes unnoticed in this transformation: IBM i ...

89% of Frontend Teams Use AI in Their Workflows, but Few Use It for Observability

We just surveyed 300 frontend and mobile engineers across 16 countries, and the finding that keeps sticking with me isn't the one about AI. It's this: 74% of engineering teams rate themselves in the "middle" of the observability maturity scale. Not reactive, not strategic. Stuck in the middle. They have dashboards, they have tracing, they have alerts. And yet when something goes wrong, they still can't tell you why ...

MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Podcast - Episode 25: AI's Impact on WAN

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 25, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses  AI's impact on the Wide Area Network (WAN) ... 

6 Signs Your APM Dashboard Looks Healthy but Your App Is Not

Application performance monitoring (APM) dashboards are only as useful as what they are configured to measure. The default setup covers obvious failure modes such as downtime, error spikes, and latency breaches, but it does not cover everything. Some failures produce no alerts or anomalies. The dashboard stays green while users experience a broken product. Here are six signs that is happening ...

AI Innovation Was the First Phase. Governance and Accountability Are the Next ...

The race to deploy AI is largely over. Most enterprises have entered it. The question now is not whether artificial intelligence is running inside the organization. The question is whether anyone is genuinely responsible for what it does. That is not a technical question. It is a leadership one. And most organizations are not yet structured to answer it honestly ...

Your AI Agent's Biggest Problem Isn't the Model - It's the Data

A new analysis of 250 real-world queries across common retail tasks, such as product pricing, availability, ratings, shipping and specifications, reveals systemic inefficiency at the heart of web-based AI agents. On average, 97.9% of the data retrieved by agents from live web pages is irrelevant to the query being answered. Specifically, the average page ingested ran nearly 9,000 characters, while the average answer was just 32 characters, resulting in a noise-to-signal ratio of 278:1. Price queries were the most extreme outlier, with noise rates approaching 99.5%. That's not a rounding error. That's a structural problem ...

Observability Is the New Control Plane for Enterprise Transformation

The enterprises that will define the next decade are not the ones that deployed the most technology. They are the ones who understood what their technology was actually doing. That distinction is not a philosophical point. It is the central operational challenge facing every organization that has spent the last five years modernizing at speed ...

When AI Becomes the Corporate OS

AI is becoming the operating system of the enterprise. It acts as an invisible coordination layer that understands intent, connects systems, and executes work across complex SaaS environments. Previously, employees had to click through multiple systems — CRM, ERP, support tools, collaboration platforms — to complete a single task. Now, instead of navigating each application manually, they can simply state what they need to accomplish ...