Skip to main content

Putting the "User" into User Experience Management

Dennis Drogseth

In the course of researching, documenting and advising on user experience management needs and directions for more than a decade, I've found myself waging a quiet (and sometimes not so quiet) war with several industry assumptions. Chief among these is the notion that user experience management (UEM) is purely a subset of application performance management (APM). This APM-centricity misses some of UEM's most critical value points, and in a basic sense fails to recognize what UEM is truly about.

What research over the course of ten years has consistently shown is that UEM is at core a two-way mirror. One side of the mirror indeed looks back at the application and its performance in terms of transactional latencies as the end user experiences them. But the other side of the mirror looks out at the end user/consumer with an eye to productivity, application usability, business impact, usage, value and relevance.

The 6 Dimensions of UEM

The next step in looking at UEM from an end-user perspective is to consider the use-case values documented in our research. EMA has validated six UEM use-case values, of which application performance is only one. These are listed based on prevalence — what people are actually doing. (When ranked by importance, the order stayed the same except that business impact outranked application performance.)

Application performance: This is the most tilted toward pureplay APM, and yet it, too, will gain from insights into user/consumer interactions relevant to completing critical business processes or other transactions.

Business impact: Here understanding the user is front and center — as most business outcomes are ultimately generated (and measurable) via end-user interactions, whether in terms of business process efficiencies, or customer/consumer outcomes.

Change management: Changes made to applications are often viewed in purely technical terms by IT. But in reality, any new application release may cause issues that transcend server or network performance. Validating change without understanding end-user impact is a story only partly told.

Design: Here end-user interaction is key, and far too often neglected. What looks good to developers in the back office may not work in real-world situations. UEM can document behaviors that not only suggest latency issues, but problems with application look and feel.

User productivity: This is all about the end-user interacting with the application. Some relevant productivity metrics ranked by their prevalence in real-world deployments are as follows:
- User productivity (number of processes executed)
- User effectiveness (success versus failure ratio)
- User efficiency (number of steps per process)
- User identification (time zone, location, computer name, IP)
- User attributes (geography, department, role)
- User proficiency (number of errors)

With this information, an entire portrait of user/consumer behavior can be mapped, understood and optimized, whether through changes in the application, improved app delivery, or actual training.

Service usage: Once again this is all about how, where, and potentially even why the end-user interacts with applications.

In the Last 3 Years …

Speaking of service usage, it isn't so surprising that in EMA's most recent research, the two areas that have become most important to UEM over the past three years are application performance and portfolio planning and optimization, which were tied for first place.

Putting the user into user experience management can provide insights into:

■ What's being used and what's not?

■ And to what effect?

■ What are the business outcomes?

■ What business processes are enhanced? Which are slowed?

■ And at what cost to business performance?

When it comes to truly optimizing application investments, all this data is critical both to IT and business stakeholders.

Business and IT Alignment Anyone?

More than anything else, applications are the "products" of IT — the core services through which businesses evolve and perform. Digital transformation wouldn't be "digital" without applications of some kind. And any smart product creator/deliverer will seriously invest in understanding how the consumers behave when engaging with their products, whether it's about toys, cars, cameras or — to take a modest leap in context — SAP.

When we asked if user experience management was an IT concern, a business concern, or a joint IT-to-business concern, the responses were consistent with years past:

■ 20% felt that UEM is primarily a business concern

■ 21% felt that UEM is primarily an IT concern

59% recognized the truth: UEM is (or should be) equally an IT and a business concern

There's Always More

Putting the user into UEM has many additional values. For instance, in creating a true common ground between development and operations for DevOps, where not only performance, but usability and design can be understood in both pre- and post-production environments. With the right linkages, understanding end-user behaviors will also bring value in industry compliance, business process assessments, and, needless to say, to training needs for complex business-critical ERP and other applications. It can also help to unify operations and service desk insights into a truly integrated strategy for UEM across all of IT.

The list continues, but hopefully I've made my point. And I welcome yours. Feel free to reach out to me at drogseth@emausa.com

The Latest

The enterprises that will define the next decade are not the ones that deployed the most technology. They are the ones who understood what their technology was actually doing. That distinction is not a philosophical point. It is the central operational challenge facing every organization that has spent the last five years modernizing at speed ...

AI is becoming the operating system of the enterprise. It acts as an invisible coordination layer that understands intent, connects systems, and executes work across complex SaaS environments. Previously, employees had to click through multiple systems — CRM, ERP, support tools, collaboration platforms — to complete a single task. Now, instead of navigating each application manually, they can simply state what they need to accomplish ...

In 2026, the cost of downtime or an outage is no longer just a technical inconvenience; it's a $600 billion wake up call for global businesses. As our digital ecosystems become  more interconnected, each touchpoint introduces new risks and multiplies the consequences when things go wrong. And the data is clear: aggregate downtime costs  for Global 2,000 companies have surged 50% since 2024, reaching a staggering $600 billion ...

Deloitte found that 74% of enterprises expect to deploy agentic AI solutions in the next 24 months. However, the rush to deployment is outpacing foundational work, though. Only 21% of enterprises have fully formed agent governance models in place. The result? AI agents deployed without guidance or governance begin to function as fragmented islands of complexity ...

Cloud spending is no longer viewed as a passthrough IT expense, but as a strategic financial lever that directly impacts innovation capacity, profitability and enterprise resilience, according to the CFO Cloud Cost Optimization Report from Azul ...

As AI moves from generating responses to performing actions, the need for trust increases exponentially. And as organizations enlist AI agents for increasingly sophisticated business processes, trust is going to be the single most important theme for spurring adoption. What can organizations do to build trustworthy AI agents? ...

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Putting the "User" into User Experience Management

Dennis Drogseth

In the course of researching, documenting and advising on user experience management needs and directions for more than a decade, I've found myself waging a quiet (and sometimes not so quiet) war with several industry assumptions. Chief among these is the notion that user experience management (UEM) is purely a subset of application performance management (APM). This APM-centricity misses some of UEM's most critical value points, and in a basic sense fails to recognize what UEM is truly about.

What research over the course of ten years has consistently shown is that UEM is at core a two-way mirror. One side of the mirror indeed looks back at the application and its performance in terms of transactional latencies as the end user experiences them. But the other side of the mirror looks out at the end user/consumer with an eye to productivity, application usability, business impact, usage, value and relevance.

The 6 Dimensions of UEM

The next step in looking at UEM from an end-user perspective is to consider the use-case values documented in our research. EMA has validated six UEM use-case values, of which application performance is only one. These are listed based on prevalence — what people are actually doing. (When ranked by importance, the order stayed the same except that business impact outranked application performance.)

Application performance: This is the most tilted toward pureplay APM, and yet it, too, will gain from insights into user/consumer interactions relevant to completing critical business processes or other transactions.

Business impact: Here understanding the user is front and center — as most business outcomes are ultimately generated (and measurable) via end-user interactions, whether in terms of business process efficiencies, or customer/consumer outcomes.

Change management: Changes made to applications are often viewed in purely technical terms by IT. But in reality, any new application release may cause issues that transcend server or network performance. Validating change without understanding end-user impact is a story only partly told.

Design: Here end-user interaction is key, and far too often neglected. What looks good to developers in the back office may not work in real-world situations. UEM can document behaviors that not only suggest latency issues, but problems with application look and feel.

User productivity: This is all about the end-user interacting with the application. Some relevant productivity metrics ranked by their prevalence in real-world deployments are as follows:
- User productivity (number of processes executed)
- User effectiveness (success versus failure ratio)
- User efficiency (number of steps per process)
- User identification (time zone, location, computer name, IP)
- User attributes (geography, department, role)
- User proficiency (number of errors)

With this information, an entire portrait of user/consumer behavior can be mapped, understood and optimized, whether through changes in the application, improved app delivery, or actual training.

Service usage: Once again this is all about how, where, and potentially even why the end-user interacts with applications.

In the Last 3 Years …

Speaking of service usage, it isn't so surprising that in EMA's most recent research, the two areas that have become most important to UEM over the past three years are application performance and portfolio planning and optimization, which were tied for first place.

Putting the user into user experience management can provide insights into:

■ What's being used and what's not?

■ And to what effect?

■ What are the business outcomes?

■ What business processes are enhanced? Which are slowed?

■ And at what cost to business performance?

When it comes to truly optimizing application investments, all this data is critical both to IT and business stakeholders.

Business and IT Alignment Anyone?

More than anything else, applications are the "products" of IT — the core services through which businesses evolve and perform. Digital transformation wouldn't be "digital" without applications of some kind. And any smart product creator/deliverer will seriously invest in understanding how the consumers behave when engaging with their products, whether it's about toys, cars, cameras or — to take a modest leap in context — SAP.

When we asked if user experience management was an IT concern, a business concern, or a joint IT-to-business concern, the responses were consistent with years past:

■ 20% felt that UEM is primarily a business concern

■ 21% felt that UEM is primarily an IT concern

59% recognized the truth: UEM is (or should be) equally an IT and a business concern

There's Always More

Putting the user into UEM has many additional values. For instance, in creating a true common ground between development and operations for DevOps, where not only performance, but usability and design can be understood in both pre- and post-production environments. With the right linkages, understanding end-user behaviors will also bring value in industry compliance, business process assessments, and, needless to say, to training needs for complex business-critical ERP and other applications. It can also help to unify operations and service desk insights into a truly integrated strategy for UEM across all of IT.

The list continues, but hopefully I've made my point. And I welcome yours. Feel free to reach out to me at drogseth@emausa.com

The Latest

The enterprises that will define the next decade are not the ones that deployed the most technology. They are the ones who understood what their technology was actually doing. That distinction is not a philosophical point. It is the central operational challenge facing every organization that has spent the last five years modernizing at speed ...

AI is becoming the operating system of the enterprise. It acts as an invisible coordination layer that understands intent, connects systems, and executes work across complex SaaS environments. Previously, employees had to click through multiple systems — CRM, ERP, support tools, collaboration platforms — to complete a single task. Now, instead of navigating each application manually, they can simply state what they need to accomplish ...

In 2026, the cost of downtime or an outage is no longer just a technical inconvenience; it's a $600 billion wake up call for global businesses. As our digital ecosystems become  more interconnected, each touchpoint introduces new risks and multiplies the consequences when things go wrong. And the data is clear: aggregate downtime costs  for Global 2,000 companies have surged 50% since 2024, reaching a staggering $600 billion ...

Deloitte found that 74% of enterprises expect to deploy agentic AI solutions in the next 24 months. However, the rush to deployment is outpacing foundational work, though. Only 21% of enterprises have fully formed agent governance models in place. The result? AI agents deployed without guidance or governance begin to function as fragmented islands of complexity ...

Cloud spending is no longer viewed as a passthrough IT expense, but as a strategic financial lever that directly impacts innovation capacity, profitability and enterprise resilience, according to the CFO Cloud Cost Optimization Report from Azul ...

As AI moves from generating responses to performing actions, the need for trust increases exponentially. And as organizations enlist AI agents for increasingly sophisticated business processes, trust is going to be the single most important theme for spurring adoption. What can organizations do to build trustworthy AI agents? ...

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...