How to Avoid Being the Next Boeing: Regular Software Checkups
August 07, 2019

Lev Lesokhin
CAST

Share this

It's been all over the news the last few months. After two fatal crashes, Boeing was forced to ground its 737. The doomed model is now undergoing extensive testing to get it back into service and production. You can almost cut the anticipation with a knife. Wall Street, the airline industry, future passengers and the manufacturer itself all want to be able to rest knowing that all Boeing planes are back on the market.

In the interim, the manufacturer has taken a very serious hit. Its stock price plummeted. Consumer safety concerns hit at an all-time low. And it all boils down to a series of software problems, and it will take new and improved updates to get the models back into the sky.


The airline/aerospace industry isn't the first or the last to come face-to-face with software flaws. It's pervasive. The big question is who's next? Automotive? Retail banking? All are plausible. This is a line that no one wants to be first in.

Why does it continue to happen? And more importantly, how can be it be avoided?

Large organizations often tell stakeholders that even though all software goes through extensive testing, this type of thing “just happens.” The old saying “to err is human” is the scapegoat. But that is exactly the problem. While the human component of application development and testing won't go away, it can be eased and supplemented by far more efficient and automated methods to proactively determine software health and identify flaws.

Gaining insight into software health lends itself to knowing how secure applications are. A recent Software Intelligence Report from CAST found 28% of businesses rely on “instinct” or their architects to assess potential IT risks. However, being in the blind about software robustness can leave organizations vulnerable, so they need to understand where the weaknesses are before it's too late, using Software Intelligence to find the biggest threats.

Just like a doctor doesn't diagnose a broken arm without an x-ray, a business shouldn't rely on human assessments alone to diagnose software issues.

Routine Checks, Spot Fixes and Physicals

The good news is with a few tweaks software health assessments can become much more effective and preventative. This can be achieved by breaking up your software health checks into three categories: routine checks, spot fixes and physicals. With this strategy, weaknesses can be detected quickly especially if the software is scanned on a regular basis. This will help identify and catch the biggest issues.

For routine checks, which should occur monthly, the focus should be on removing more defects than were added, and identifying the most common defects and asking, “do we know how to avoid the obvious flaws?” Identifying what a bad practice is helps teach developers not just about weaknesses but how to avoid them. In addition, change velocity should be relatively constant. Software releases with massive changes in functionality tend to cause concern. Defect density should also never slide up.
 
Spot fixes are frequent but can tell you a lot about a specific problem. Trouble tickets provided by customers or users can let you know specifics such as did it crash, was it slow, did it lockup? Knowing a specific pain and developing a plan to treat it will create real data that can improve metrics and identify issues such performance against the defects in a module or method, machine reboots caused by memory leaks or security breaches. In addition, this data can be combined with cost and hour data to develop a better prediction on staffing and usage.
 
Finally, the annual physical. Look for trends in key data from the same point each year. For example, was there an increase in complexity? Is the application getting harder to maintain? Has the defect density increased/decreased? Are the lines of code or number of transactions increasing? This can signify less experienced coders and increases the risk for potential defects.
 
Application maintenance is the responsibility of every IT department but understanding software health – whether it's secure, efficient, resilient – is the most vital aspect to ensuring that even a minor update, doesn't cause a ripple effect on the whole organization and generate unintended consequences, like what happened to Boeing.

Better software intelligence processes to determine health can pre-warn a business about risk and these three checkups should be a part of maintaining every application over time. All of the data should also be captured in a software health dashboard that tracks progress and can provide a quick glance at health in terms of robustness, efficiency, security, changeability, transferability and quality. A dashboard not only gives fast facts about the evolution of the software, but it also can give insights to where you are at highest risk and providing trending analysis to benchmark over time.

All developers should remember that it's impossible to retrofit stability and trust into an application. It has to be designed and engineered in, or the erosion sets in and your business can jump the queue and become the next Boeing.

Lev Lesokhin is EVP of Strategy and Analytics at CAST
Share this

The Latest

July 09, 2020

Enterprises that halted their cloud migration journey during the current global pandemic are two and a half times more likely than those that continued their move to the cloud to have experienced IT outages that negatively impacted their SLAs, according to Virtana's latest survey report The Current State of Hybrid Cloud and IT ...

July 08, 2020

Every business has the responsibility to do their part against climate change by reducing their carbon footprint while increasing sustainability and efficiency. Harnessing optimization of IT infrastructure is one method companies can use to reduce carbon footprint, improve sustainability and increase business efficiency, while also keeping costs down ...

July 07, 2020

While the adoption of continuous integration (CI) is on the rise, software engineering teams are unable to take a zero-tolerance approach to software failures, costing enterprise organizations billions annually, according to a quantitative study conducted by Undo and a Cambridge Judge Business School MBA project ...

June 25, 2020

I've had the opportunity to work with a number of organizations embarking on their AIOps journey. I always advise them to start by evaluating their needs and the possibilities AIOps can bring to them through five different levels of AIOps maturity. This is a strategic approach that allows enterprises to achieve complete automation for long-term success ...

June 24, 2020

Sumo Logic recently commissioned an independent market research study to understand the industry momentum behind continuous intelligence — and the necessity for digital organizations to embrace a cloud-native, real-time continuous intelligence platform to support the speed and agility of business for faster decision-making, optimizing security, driving new innovation and delivering world-class customer experiences. Some of the key findings include ...