
Sentry launched AI Agent Monitoring to help teams keep an eye on the AI/Agents in their products.
Within the same Sentry UI that developers already use to fix app issues, teams can now also see exactly how their AI features are working — or not working. They can figure out why an AI response was slow, where/why it's throwing errors, which tool or model or type of user input caused the problem, and how many resources (like tokens) were used.
All of this is deeply connected to the frontend/backend that Sentry already helps with — so if an issue is only showing up for users on a certain device/software build/region, for example, you will know. If the AI model is returning data in a way that is making the app crash but only on some dusty Android build, you will know. This would otherwise take hours and hours to track down.
With Agent Monitoring, you get a complete, interactive trace of every agent run:
- Full execution breakdowns: from the System prompts, across user input, model generation, tool usage, and final output — making it easy to see what actually happened at each step, not just where it ended up.
- Model performance details: token usage, latency, error rate — all filterable by model name and version — to surface slow, costly, or silently failing calls before they hit production users.
- Tool analytics: usage volume, durations, and failure patterns — helping you identify bottlenecks, debug tool errors, and understand where the heavy lifting is really happening.
- Error tagging and grouping: automatically groups similar failures across runs — reducing noise and letting you focus on fixing what matters most.
At launch Sentry AI Agent Monitoring will work with OpenAI, Vercel's AI SDK, and most setups that use OpenTelemetry.
The Latest
While 87% of manufacturing leaders and technical specialists report that ROI from their AIOps initiatives has met or exceeded expectations, only 37% say they are fully prepared to operationalize AI at scale, according to The Future of IT Operations in the AI Era, a report from Riverbed ...
Many organizations rely on cloud-first architectures to aggregate, analyze, and act on their operational data ... However, not all environments are conducive to cloud-first architectures ... There are limitations to cloud-first architectures that render them ineffective in mission-critical situations where responsiveness, cost control, and data sovereignty are non-negotiable; these limitations include ...
For years, cybersecurity was built around a simple assumption: protect the physical network and trust everything inside it. That model made sense when employees worked in offices, applications lived in data centers, and devices rarely left the building. Today's reality is fluid: people work from everywhere, applications run across multiple clouds, and AI-driven agents are beginning to act on behalf of users. But while the old perimeter dissolved, a new one quietly emerged ...
For years, infrastructure teams have treated compute as a relatively stable input. Capacity was provisioned, costs were forecasted, and performance expectations were set based on the assumption that identical resources behaved identically. That mental model is starting to break down. AI infrastructure is no longer behaving like static cloud capacity. It is increasingly behaving like a market ...
Resilience can no longer be defined by how quickly an organization recovers from an incident or disruption. The effectiveness of any resilience strategy is dependent on its ability to anticipate change, operate under continuous stress, and adapt confidently amid uncertainty ...
Mobile users are less tolerant of app instability than ever before. According to a new report from Luciq, No Margin for Error: What Mobile Users Expect and What Mobile Leaders Must Deliver in 2026, even minor performance issues now result in immediate abandonment, lost purchases, and long-term brand impact ...
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become the dominant force shaping enterprise data strategies. Boards expect progress. Executives expect returns. And data leaders are under pressure to prove that their organizations are "AI-ready" ...
Agentic AI is a major buzzword for 2026. Many tech companies are making bold promises about this technology, but many aren't grounded in reality, at least not yet. This coming year will likely be shaped by reality checks for IT teams, and progress will only come from a focus on strong foundations and disciplined execution ...
AI systems are still prone to hallucinations and misjudgments ... To build the trust needed for adoption, AI must be paired with human-in-the-loop (HITL) oversight, or checkpoints where humans verify, guide, and decide what actions are taken. The balance between autonomy and accountability is what will allow AI to deliver on its promise without sacrificing human trust ...
More data center leaders are reducing their reliance on utility grids by investing in onsite power for rapidly scaling data centers, according to the Data Center Power Report from Bloom Energy ...