In the latest Keynote study of air travel websites, Southwest.com took first place for Overall Customer Experience, while US Airways scored highest for Responsiveness (Speed) and JetBlue took first for Reliability.
The study is part of the work performed by Keynote Competitive Research. The rankings are based on responses from real users, who were observed as they accomplished tasks on each of the sites studied, as well as real data collected through Keynote website monitoring to assess the technical quality of the sites. For each study, Keynote recognizes the companies with the overall top ranking, as well as those exhibiting excellence in specific categories.
For the 'Customer Experience' portion of the study, Keynote conducted online user testing sessions with 2,000 prospective customers (200 per site) from across the United States as each interacted with the website of one of 10 air travel booking websites: American, Delta, Expedia, JetBlue, Orbitz, Priceline (NEW), Southwest, Travelocity, United and US Airways.
For the Customer Experience portion of the 2013 US Air Travel Study, panelists were asked to spend a few minutes on the site's home page, forming an impression of the site and what it has to offer. Panelists were then asked to complete a variety of flight search and booking tasks, including searching for a particular flight from the site's homepage, as well as from an outside search engine. Finally, panelists were asked to proceed through the process of booking the flight they found during the previous task, going as far as possible without actually completing the purchase.
The study revealed that when tested by actual consumers Southwest's website (www.southwest.com) offered the strongest overall Customer Experience, finishing first in the Brand Impact and Customer Satisfaction categories.
Other key findings include:
- Ease of Booking remains the most important aspect of the customer experience, predicting brand perceptions and conversion
- Price Satisfaction, Site Organization, Flight Search Option Satisfaction, Flight Availability, Visual Appeal, and Perceived Performance are the key drivers for brand and conversion
- Five sites now provide the best Overall Customer Experience in 2013: Southwest, Travelocity, Priceline, Orbitz, and Expedia
- Southwest, Orbitz, and Expedia continue to be top performers. Travelocity improves significantly this year and is now a top site across all 4 indices. Priceline enters the rankings in 2013, also a top performer across all Keynote indices.
"Our quantitative analysis revealed that when actual users visited the air travel sites, ease of booking continues to be the most important predictor of a positive customer experience, but price satisfaction, site organization and strong search functionality were all also very important to our panel of testers," said Ben Rushlo, senior director of performance management at Keynote. "In the Technical Quality portion of the study, JetBlue scored very well for both Reliability and Responsiveness, but overall, while improving slightly from last year's study, almost all of the sites had slower load times than recommended for optimal performance levels."
In addition to evaluating customer experience with its panel of actual users, the Keynote study also examined two broad aspects of technical quality: responsiveness and reliability. Responsiveness comprises: high speed response, DSL (midband) response, response time consistency, geographic uniformity and load handling, while reliability is comprised of availability and outages.
For the 'Technical Quality' portion of the study, using measurement computers located in 12 locations across the US, Keynote measured a typical transaction of starting at the Home Page and going through the process of searching for and booking a flight, stopping where payment information was requested. Based on the thousands of transactions monitored over the course of the study, US Airways' website scored highest in site Responsiveness (or speed), while JetBlue's website scored the highest for Reliability with a perfect score of 1000.
The Latest
Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ...
Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...
Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...
Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...
The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...
The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...
In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...
AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.
The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...