Skip to main content

Streaming Wars: How Streaming Services Can Strengthen Infrastructure to Improve the User Experience

Amir Krayden
Senser

Following the release of Netflix's impressive fourth quarter earnings report, which highlighted a 12.5% increase in revenue and an additional 13 million subscribers from the previous year, one thing is for certain: we are in the heyday of video streaming services. As viewers continue to be glued to their screens to tune in to new content and rewatch their favorite shows, the industry is absolutely thriving — in 2021, Forbes reported close to 50 services in North America alone, and as of 2023, that number has climbed to 239 (according to IBISWorld).

But with over 200 streaming services to choose from, including multiple platforms featuring similar types of entertainment, users have little incentive to remain loyal to any given platform if it exhibits performance issues. Big names in streaming like Hulu, Amazon Prime and HBO Max invest thousands of hours into engineering observability and closed-loop monitoring to combat infrastructure and application issues, but smaller platforms struggle to remain competitive without access to the same resources.


Compounding the importance of reliability for brand loyalty is the need for streaming platforms to constantly innovate and outpace competitors; new UX and faster speeds are necessary to stand out from the pack. However, these new deployments can easily lead to unforeseen service issues unless proper monitoring is put in place.

Market Evolution

Combined with the standards set by industry leaders like Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime and HBO Max, our culture's heightened emphasis on and desire for instant gratification has raised the bar for customer expectations. Because of this, traditional infrastructure and application tools are no longer good enough. Existing solutions leave room for potential disruptions that go undetected and impact the user experience. To keep pace with the times, streaming services — especially ones of smaller scale — must invest in future-proofing observability solutions that combine real-time, zero-instrumentation topology of their environments with predictive analytics and machine learning to stay ahead of competitors and maintain the business of their customers.

How Smaller Streaming Companies Can Position Themselves to Win

Large streaming services such as Prime Video and Hulu invest thousands of hours into engineering observability and closed-loop monitoring. An example of this is Netflix's pioneering architecture and in-house tools, which have set the curve for the industry. But for the smaller streaming services, particularly newcomers to the AVOD and FAST spaces, scaling the many moving parts of a streaming platform becomes a challenge. The layers of infrastructure, network, storage and computation create interdependent systems that can lead to cascading effects and serious service disruptions. To secure their position within an increasingly crowded space, it's essential for streaming services to build strong observability.

To ensure that they are best positioned to mitigate and quickly respond to anything that could result in a service disruption, it is important for all streaming services to have the resources in place to allow them to scale and strengthen the layers of technology that are critical to their continued operations and efficiency.

For smaller and newer streaming services looking to scale operations — and deploy increasingly complicated infrastructure and networking — it's essential to understand the interdependencies of different systems, services, and data centers. Rather than attempt to cobble these solutions together in-house with limited resources, streamers can take advantage of the growing AIOps for observability space, and make use of both vendors and open-source tools.

Key Factors to Consider

When exploring the option to onboard next-gen observability tools, smaller streaming platforms should consider the following elements:

The "hidden costs" of observability — Paying for a third-party service is often cheaper than the ballooning costs of attempting to monitor in-house, or use legacy solutions. Traditional monitoring tools can eat up a significant portion of infrastructure budgets, as high as 30%.

Getting DevOps back to important feature work — as mentioned above, staying ahead of the competition is essential in the streaming space. If DevOps teams are burdened by triaging and analyzing production issues, they're unable to work on new feature developments — such as improved UX — that will help their organization get ahead of the competition.

Streaming services are very sensitive in terms of their entire stack — infrastructure, network and video layers all comprise a delicate ecosystem, wherein a production issue has a compounded risk to affect customers. A full-stack holistic approach to observability is a must.

By ensuring that their IT infrastructure and environments are well-equipped with the tools and capabilities necessary to maintain smooth service to users, smaller streaming platforms can position themselves to uphold important operations and be able to keep pace with a market dominated by industry leaders.

Amir Krayden is CEO and Co-Founder of Senser

The Latest

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

40% of organizations deploying AI will implement dedicated AI observability tools by 2028 to monitor model performance, bias and outputs, according to Gartner ...

Until AI-powered engineering tools have live visibility of how code behaves at runtime, they cannot be trusted to autonomously ensure reliable systems, according to the State of AI-Powered Engineering Report 2026 report from Lightrun. The report reveals that a major volume of manual work is required when AI-generated code is deployed: 43% of AI-generated code requires manual debugging in production, even after passing QA or staging tests. Furthermore, an average of three manual redeploy cycles are required to verify a single AI-suggested code fix in production ...

Many organizations describe AI as strategic, but they do not manage it strategically. When AI plans are disconnected from strategy, detached from organizational learning, and protected from serious assumptions testing, the problem is no longer technical immaturity; it is a failure of management discipline ... Executives too often tell organizations to "use AI" before they define what AI is supposed to change. The problem deepens in organizations where strategy isn't well articulated in the first place ...

Across the enterprise technology landscape, a quiet crisis is playing out. Organizations have run hundreds, sometimes thousands, of generative AI pilots. Leadership has celebrated the proof of concept (POCs) ... Industry experience points to a sobering reality: only 5-10% of AI POCs that progress to the pilot stage successfully reach scaled production. The remaining 90% fail because the enterprise environment around them was never ready to absorb them, not the AI models ...

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...

Streaming Wars: How Streaming Services Can Strengthen Infrastructure to Improve the User Experience

Amir Krayden
Senser

Following the release of Netflix's impressive fourth quarter earnings report, which highlighted a 12.5% increase in revenue and an additional 13 million subscribers from the previous year, one thing is for certain: we are in the heyday of video streaming services. As viewers continue to be glued to their screens to tune in to new content and rewatch their favorite shows, the industry is absolutely thriving — in 2021, Forbes reported close to 50 services in North America alone, and as of 2023, that number has climbed to 239 (according to IBISWorld).

But with over 200 streaming services to choose from, including multiple platforms featuring similar types of entertainment, users have little incentive to remain loyal to any given platform if it exhibits performance issues. Big names in streaming like Hulu, Amazon Prime and HBO Max invest thousands of hours into engineering observability and closed-loop monitoring to combat infrastructure and application issues, but smaller platforms struggle to remain competitive without access to the same resources.


Compounding the importance of reliability for brand loyalty is the need for streaming platforms to constantly innovate and outpace competitors; new UX and faster speeds are necessary to stand out from the pack. However, these new deployments can easily lead to unforeseen service issues unless proper monitoring is put in place.

Market Evolution

Combined with the standards set by industry leaders like Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime and HBO Max, our culture's heightened emphasis on and desire for instant gratification has raised the bar for customer expectations. Because of this, traditional infrastructure and application tools are no longer good enough. Existing solutions leave room for potential disruptions that go undetected and impact the user experience. To keep pace with the times, streaming services — especially ones of smaller scale — must invest in future-proofing observability solutions that combine real-time, zero-instrumentation topology of their environments with predictive analytics and machine learning to stay ahead of competitors and maintain the business of their customers.

How Smaller Streaming Companies Can Position Themselves to Win

Large streaming services such as Prime Video and Hulu invest thousands of hours into engineering observability and closed-loop monitoring. An example of this is Netflix's pioneering architecture and in-house tools, which have set the curve for the industry. But for the smaller streaming services, particularly newcomers to the AVOD and FAST spaces, scaling the many moving parts of a streaming platform becomes a challenge. The layers of infrastructure, network, storage and computation create interdependent systems that can lead to cascading effects and serious service disruptions. To secure their position within an increasingly crowded space, it's essential for streaming services to build strong observability.

To ensure that they are best positioned to mitigate and quickly respond to anything that could result in a service disruption, it is important for all streaming services to have the resources in place to allow them to scale and strengthen the layers of technology that are critical to their continued operations and efficiency.

For smaller and newer streaming services looking to scale operations — and deploy increasingly complicated infrastructure and networking — it's essential to understand the interdependencies of different systems, services, and data centers. Rather than attempt to cobble these solutions together in-house with limited resources, streamers can take advantage of the growing AIOps for observability space, and make use of both vendors and open-source tools.

Key Factors to Consider

When exploring the option to onboard next-gen observability tools, smaller streaming platforms should consider the following elements:

The "hidden costs" of observability — Paying for a third-party service is often cheaper than the ballooning costs of attempting to monitor in-house, or use legacy solutions. Traditional monitoring tools can eat up a significant portion of infrastructure budgets, as high as 30%.

Getting DevOps back to important feature work — as mentioned above, staying ahead of the competition is essential in the streaming space. If DevOps teams are burdened by triaging and analyzing production issues, they're unable to work on new feature developments — such as improved UX — that will help their organization get ahead of the competition.

Streaming services are very sensitive in terms of their entire stack — infrastructure, network and video layers all comprise a delicate ecosystem, wherein a production issue has a compounded risk to affect customers. A full-stack holistic approach to observability is a must.

By ensuring that their IT infrastructure and environments are well-equipped with the tools and capabilities necessary to maintain smooth service to users, smaller streaming platforms can position themselves to uphold important operations and be able to keep pace with a market dominated by industry leaders.

Amir Krayden is CEO and Co-Founder of Senser

The Latest

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

40% of organizations deploying AI will implement dedicated AI observability tools by 2028 to monitor model performance, bias and outputs, according to Gartner ...

Until AI-powered engineering tools have live visibility of how code behaves at runtime, they cannot be trusted to autonomously ensure reliable systems, according to the State of AI-Powered Engineering Report 2026 report from Lightrun. The report reveals that a major volume of manual work is required when AI-generated code is deployed: 43% of AI-generated code requires manual debugging in production, even after passing QA or staging tests. Furthermore, an average of three manual redeploy cycles are required to verify a single AI-suggested code fix in production ...

Many organizations describe AI as strategic, but they do not manage it strategically. When AI plans are disconnected from strategy, detached from organizational learning, and protected from serious assumptions testing, the problem is no longer technical immaturity; it is a failure of management discipline ... Executives too often tell organizations to "use AI" before they define what AI is supposed to change. The problem deepens in organizations where strategy isn't well articulated in the first place ...

Across the enterprise technology landscape, a quiet crisis is playing out. Organizations have run hundreds, sometimes thousands, of generative AI pilots. Leadership has celebrated the proof of concept (POCs) ... Industry experience points to a sobering reality: only 5-10% of AI POCs that progress to the pilot stage successfully reach scaled production. The remaining 90% fail because the enterprise environment around them was never ready to absorb them, not the AI models ...

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...