The ability to view things from the end user perspective and to drill down into the code level deep dive can be extremely powerful, and the information gathered from this ability provides DevOps teams with an instant view into the direct root cause of any user experience problem they may not otherwise have noticed.
Traditional real-user monitoring (RUM) techniques provide insight into how your user actually interacts with your website or application. Synthetic monitoring, particularly when using real browsers, provides a similar assessment of expected user experience along with the benefits of true availability monitoring, third-party impact, and consistent baselining capabilities.
Combining synthetic and RUM gives a complete view of the user experience along with high level root cause clues. RUM, by itself, can miss outages, page errors, and third-party problems. Synthetic, by itself, is really only a proxy for real-user experience and can miss problems experienced by various user populations. Using both techniques in tandem eliminates those inherent blind spots and can provide an organization with the best view of their users’ experience – both actual and potential.
But monitoring user experience only tells you half of the story. The ability to look at things from the application/back-end perspective and drill down to the code (or up to end-user transactions) is a powerful root cause identifier. By discovering problems in delivery, DevOps teams can work to prevent or minimize user impact on their software.
Application and server monitoring provide insight into relative transaction performance. Furthermore, it provides an accurate view into the root cause of user experience degradation in your own infrastructure. These tools allow developers to identify issues before code is deployed while simultaneously giving ops teams the tools to address issues and communicate to app owners in real time. Providing this flexible view of user experience and application health provides a clear view of impact and root cause, allowing dev and ops to work together prevent and minimize damaging negative user experiences. Having all of this working together at the same time will do wonders for your overall relationship with your end user.
The ability to pivot the perspective from user experience to application transaction performance can give your organization a powerful view into user experience and root cause diagnostics. Put another way, it helps to answer the “what” along with (possibly more importantly) the “why” when it comes to performance issues. When these perspectives are seamlessly tied together and are easily available to a variety of technical and business users, the result can only be APM awesomeness!
Denis Goodwin is Director of Product Management for APM at SmartBear.
The Latest
The 2024 State of the Data Center Report from CoreSite shows that although C-suite confidence in the economy remains high, a VUCA (volatile, uncertain, complex, ambiguous) environment has many business leaders proceeding with caution when it comes to their IT and data ecosystems, with an emphasis on cost control and predictability, flexibility and risk management ...
In June, New Relic published the State of Observability for Energy and Utilities Report to share insights, analysis, and data on the impact of full-stack observability software in energy and utilities organizations' service capabilities. Here are eight key takeaways from the report ...
The rapid rise of generative AI (GenAI) has caught everyone's attention, leaving many to wonder if the technology's impact will live up to the immense hype. A recent survey by Alteryx provides valuable insights into the current state of GenAI adoption, revealing a shift from inflated expectations to tangible value realization across enterprises ... Here are five key takeaways that underscore GenAI's progression from hype to real-world impact ...
As software development grows more intricate, the challenge for observability engineers tasked with ensuring optimal system performance becomes more daunting. Current methodologies are struggling to keep pace, with the annual Observability Pulse surveys indicating a rise in Mean Time to Remediation (MTTR). According to this survey, only a small fraction of organizations, around 10%, achieve full observability today. Generative AI, however, promises to significantly move the needle ...
While nearly all data leaders surveyed are building generative AI applications, most don't believe their data estate is actually prepared to support them, according to the State of Reliable AI report from Monte Carlo Data ...
Enterprises are putting a lot of effort into improving the digital employee experience (DEX), which has become essential to both improving organizational performance and attracting and retaining talented workers. But to date, most efforts to deliver outstanding DEX have focused on people working with laptops, PCs, or thin clients. Employees on the frontlines, using mobile devices to handle logistics ... have been largely overlooked ...
The average customer-facing incident takes nearly three hours to resolve (175 minutes) while the estimated cost of downtime is $4,537 per minute, meaning each incident can cost nearly $794,000, according to new research from PagerDuty ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 8, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses AutoCon with the conference founders Scott Robohn and Chris Grundemann ...
Numerous vendors and service providers have recently embraced the NaaS concept, yet there is still no industry consensus on its definition or the types of networks it involves. Furthermore, providers have varied in how they define the NaaS service delivery model. I conducted research for a new report, Network as a Service: Understanding the Cloud Consumption Model in Networking, to refine the concept of NaaS and reduce buyer confusion over what it is and how it can offer value ...
