Two APM Takeaways from Velocity Santa Clara 2014
July 07, 2014

Denis Goodwin
SmartBear

Share this

Last week my team and I spent several days at the Velocity conference for web application and performance – arguably the one place where the most technical of performance folk and the most business focused web folk come together and focus solely on application performance. Anyone with a vested interest is there to learn, debate and show off their latest and greatest products and ideas. As the team and I spent time talking to customers, attending sessions and visiting vendors I was struck by a couple of interesting trends that seemed to stand out.


1. Continuous Development/Integration + Tools Fragmentation

Interestingly enough, while everyone was talking about continuous integration, very few solutions actually play well with each other – never mind being integrated in the same platform. I was particularly struck by the tremendous amount of fragmentation in the market. A lot of vendors are solving just one part of the problem. As the CEO of one exhibitor said to me when I pressed him on this point: the specific pain points and their separate solutions represent a big enough problem as it is – solving the larger problem of bringing all the parts together is almost insurmountable at this particular moment in time for this market lifecycle. This is true for almost every APM vendor in the marketplace today.  

Many of the folks I spoke with at the show are using several solutions simultaneously in order to measure all different parts of the full APM spectrum — user experience, performance, and availability. This seemed at odds with the buzz around DevOps and continuous integration and delivery. If users aren’t able to standardize on a common tool to monitor their production web apps and APIs, how can they possibly be consistent in measuring the quality of their user’s experience while delivering those apps via continuous integration? If there are multiple tools being used to measure user experience via synthetic and real monitoring and load testing in production, how many are being added in pre-production environments? How does a team know what the varied data is showing them if each tool only shows an individual part on its own terms?

2. Load Testing = Very Popular Topic

It was interesting to see load testing get as much emphasis as it did, among both vendors and attendees. What really seemed to generate excitement was the importance of tightly connecting both load testing and synthetic monitoring.  Companies need the ability to apply load against their applications for a simultaneous understanding of the user experience – before going live. Without the ability to empathize with the end user, companies can never confidently deploy their applications. The move to continuous delivery and integration only amplifies the importance of stressing your applications on a regular basis and the need for tools that enable efficient load tests. It also calls for excellent diagnostic tools to facilitate fixes and so facilitate time to market.

Is it possible that what’s old is new again? Does continuous integration and delivery require a new way of doing old things? Is it simply applying the same approach to multiple environments simultaneously? It seems that bringing a consistency to measurement and assessment methodologies across environments, coupled with continuous assessment and feedback, is a key to ensuring that your software improves with each iteration. Equally important is an easy to deploy toolset that is accessible and provides insights to users developing applications as well as those supporting them in production.

Denis Goodwin is Director of Product Management, APM, AlertSite UXM, SmartBear Software.


Denis Goodwin at Velocity 2014

Share this

The Latest

August 21, 2019

For the first time, a majority of companies are putting mission critical apps in the cloud, according to the latest report by Cloud Foundry Foundation ...

August 20, 2019

The cloud continues to transform IT in every industry. But in order to migrate to the cloud, embrace these new technologies and truly evolve their business, organizations need an underlying network that can support digital transformation ...

August 19, 2019

One common infrastructure challenge arises with virtual private networks (VPNs). VPNs have long been relied upon to deliver the network connectivity and security enterprises required at a price they could afford. Organizations still routinely turn to them to provide internal and trusted third-parties with "secure" remote access to isolated networks. However, with the rise in mobile, IoT, multi- and hybrid-cloud, as well as edge computing, traditional enterprise perimeters are extending and becoming blurred ...

August 15, 2019

The configuration management database (CMDB), along with its more federated companion, the configuration management system (CMS), has been bathed in a deluge of negative opinions from all fronts — industry experts, vendors, and IT professionals. But from what recent EMA research on analytics, ITSM performance and other areas is indicating, those negative views seem to be missing out on a real undercurrent of truth — that CMDB/CMS alignments, whatever their defects, strongly skew to success in terms of overall IT progressiveness and effectiveness ...

August 14, 2019

The on-demand economy has transformed the way we move around, eat, learn, travel and connect at a massive scale. However, with disruption and big aspirations comes big, complex challenges. To take these challenges head-on, on-demand economy companies are finding new ways to deliver their services and products to an audience with ever-increasing expectations, and that's what we'll look at in this blog ...