CA Technologies announced the results of sponsored research that shows a strong relationship between use of an executive dashboard and the revenue growth of the overall business.
The study, Making Your Investment in an Executive Dashboard Count: What to Look for and Why, revealed how IT and business leaders are using executive dashboards to support effective IT service delivery and ultimately drive business growth. An executive dashboard is a tool that provides information regarding business impact and overall performance of IT services in support of more effective IT service delivery.
A full two-thirds of the 250 respondents surveyed claim to have seen clear financial benefits from their dashboards by improving operational efficiency (64 percent), uptime for critical services (51 percent) and company productivity (44 percent).
The average estimated bottom-line contribution of their executive dashboard (without subtracting costs for ROI) was approximately $250,000 over a 12 month period, while about 25 percent claimed to have seen more than $500,000 in value from their dashboard.
“Given trends such as cloud, the growth of IT business ecosystems, cost pressures to outperform, and business pressures to deliver increasing value, the right executive dashboard can become one of the most positive and catalytic investments a company can make,” said Dennis Drogseth, VP, EMA. “If chosen well, an executive dashboard will promote awareness and communication, and provide the flexibility needed to assimilate the information resources most relevant to an organization without sacrificing easy access and without requiring high administrative overhead.”
The research also showed data that supports the importance of correlating IT service performance and IT activities with desired business outcomes, thus improving service delivery and business-IT alignment.
Chief among these data are:
* A viable tool: A significant percentage of IT and line of business (LOB) executives today leverage executive dashboards for information about business impact and overall IT performance. Nearly 80 percent of IT executives and 70 percent of LOB executives use executive dashboards two or more times per week.
* Most important benefits: Respondents cited better alignment of IT resources to the business (48 percent) and good communication between IT and the LOB (34 percent) as the top benefits expected from executive dashboards.
* Main drivers of purchase decision: Difficulty sharing IT metrics more broadly across IT and with business stakeholders and lack of real-time awareness of service health and performance were cited as two of the primary pain points that drive the purchase of executive dashboards.
“Information-overloaded executives aren’t interested in every detailed metric and they don’t want to be bombarded by information that isn’t directly relevant to their concerns,” said Mike Sargent, general manager, Enterprise Management, CA Technologies. “They want to know about the performance of critical services that directly impact business value – such as end-user experience, brand reputation, and opportunities to drive revenue and profit. They want to be able to consume this information easily, whenever or wherever they are working, and in a format that’s focused, interactive and supports their rapid decision-making."
“CA Executive Insight for Service Assurance enables IT to be a more strategic partner to the lines of business. By providing visibility into real time performance metrics and gaining a better understanding which metrics are most important to the business, IT can better align resources with business priorities and help drive bottom-line impact. Access to early warning signs of success or failure help the lines of business minimize risks and pursue opportunities.”
Enterprise Management Associates (EMA) conducted the study on behalf of CA Technologies. EMA surveyed 250 active users of executive dashboards in North America. Strict priorities were placed on achieving a truly executive mix among respondents, which included 60% C-level, VP or Director-level respondents within IT, and 15% line-of-business executives, managers and strategists. A targeted balance between IT and non-IT respondents helped ensure that a meaningful population came from business rather than IT sectors. Top verticals were Financial Services, Manufacturing and Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals, which represented 53% of the respondent base.
Hot Topic
The Latest
Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...
In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ...
Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...
Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...
Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...
The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...
The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...
In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...
AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.
The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...