Skip to main content

User Experience is King

Rob Mason
Applause

For businesses of every size and industry, customer experience should be of the highest priority. In today's "new normal," the majority of customer experiences are now happening digitally. This means everything from signing up for an account to checking out online needs to be perfected for a smooth, easy user experience. If potential customers are frustrated by your sign-up process, or things don't work as they'd expect, it's all too easy for them to turn to your competitors for similar offerings and easier user experiences.

To get insights into how users feel about signing up for new digital services and overall expectations of their online experiences, my organization, Applause, conducted a survey last month with over 4,200 participants globally on this topic. Here's what we found.

Nearly 2/3 of consumers have abandoned an online purchase or account sign-up because the process was too difficult. This stat alone highlights just how important user experience is. The majority of a business' potential customers will go elsewhere or not complete a sale just because of user experience. With that in mind, excellent digital user experience isn't a nice to have for today's brands. It's not even a competitive advantage. It's an essential, and without it, a business is unlikely to succeed.

Taking it a step further, we asked what specifically was difficult about the online sign-up process that led users to abandon it. The five most common challenges were:

■ Too many steps / too long of a process

■ Process was unclear

■ Something didn't work right, a bug in the application

■ Account activation issues

■ Difficulty entering the required information

Poor customer onboarding hurts any organization's bottom line. It increases the costs required to get a new customer, lowers customer retention, and in today's online-first world, can result in negative reviews for your application or website that make potential customers avoid it entirely. Today, poor user experience equals lost opportunities, and worse, poor brand reputation.

Other findings from our survey included:

■ 64% of users had created two or more new digital service accounts within the past month

■ 55% reported experiencing a digital process that took too long or had too many steps

■ 32% said they experienced a digital process that was unclear

While these numbers show just how little the margin for digital error is, they could be even worse. When users were asked why they didn't abandon a process, they typically reported that the account was required (for work, school, etc.), or they couldn't get the same product or service elsewhere.

The bottom line findings from this survey were that in a digital-first world, user patience is low and expectations are high. Users expect applications to be easy to understand and use, and to work without any issues or errors arising. If a process is too complex or slow, that is enough to send a potential customer to your competitors.

The reality of the situation is, no user experience can be totally perfect for everyone. Each user is different, coming from a different location, using a different device, among many other variables. The best thing an organization can do is give application development and testing the time and resources needed to get it right. You can equate prioritizing digital user experience with prioritizing your customers, something brands have been doing all along. The main difference is that the landscape for making customers king has shifted to online. As you would train employees to deliver excellent customer service and be ready to help customers when they enter a store, you need to bring that same thoughtfulness to your digital applications, by designing and testing them with your users in mind.

Rob Mason is CTO of Applause

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

User Experience is King

Rob Mason
Applause

For businesses of every size and industry, customer experience should be of the highest priority. In today's "new normal," the majority of customer experiences are now happening digitally. This means everything from signing up for an account to checking out online needs to be perfected for a smooth, easy user experience. If potential customers are frustrated by your sign-up process, or things don't work as they'd expect, it's all too easy for them to turn to your competitors for similar offerings and easier user experiences.

To get insights into how users feel about signing up for new digital services and overall expectations of their online experiences, my organization, Applause, conducted a survey last month with over 4,200 participants globally on this topic. Here's what we found.

Nearly 2/3 of consumers have abandoned an online purchase or account sign-up because the process was too difficult. This stat alone highlights just how important user experience is. The majority of a business' potential customers will go elsewhere or not complete a sale just because of user experience. With that in mind, excellent digital user experience isn't a nice to have for today's brands. It's not even a competitive advantage. It's an essential, and without it, a business is unlikely to succeed.

Taking it a step further, we asked what specifically was difficult about the online sign-up process that led users to abandon it. The five most common challenges were:

■ Too many steps / too long of a process

■ Process was unclear

■ Something didn't work right, a bug in the application

■ Account activation issues

■ Difficulty entering the required information

Poor customer onboarding hurts any organization's bottom line. It increases the costs required to get a new customer, lowers customer retention, and in today's online-first world, can result in negative reviews for your application or website that make potential customers avoid it entirely. Today, poor user experience equals lost opportunities, and worse, poor brand reputation.

Other findings from our survey included:

■ 64% of users had created two or more new digital service accounts within the past month

■ 55% reported experiencing a digital process that took too long or had too many steps

■ 32% said they experienced a digital process that was unclear

While these numbers show just how little the margin for digital error is, they could be even worse. When users were asked why they didn't abandon a process, they typically reported that the account was required (for work, school, etc.), or they couldn't get the same product or service elsewhere.

The bottom line findings from this survey were that in a digital-first world, user patience is low and expectations are high. Users expect applications to be easy to understand and use, and to work without any issues or errors arising. If a process is too complex or slow, that is enough to send a potential customer to your competitors.

The reality of the situation is, no user experience can be totally perfect for everyone. Each user is different, coming from a different location, using a different device, among many other variables. The best thing an organization can do is give application development and testing the time and resources needed to get it right. You can equate prioritizing digital user experience with prioritizing your customers, something brands have been doing all along. The main difference is that the landscape for making customers king has shifted to online. As you would train employees to deliver excellent customer service and be ready to help customers when they enter a store, you need to bring that same thoughtfulness to your digital applications, by designing and testing them with your users in mind.

Rob Mason is CTO of Applause

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...