Skip to main content

You Have 40 Monitoring Tools, Make the Next One Count

Richard Whitehead
Moogsoft

In our growing digital economy, end users have no tolerance for downtime. Consequently, IT leaders invest heavily in availability: DevOps and SRE (site reliability engineering) teams to ensure digital apps and services are continuously available and digital tools built to influence uptime.

As recent research uncovered, IT leaders invest in a lot of single-domain monitoring tools. In fact, teams rely on an average of 16 monitoring tools — and up to 40 — according to the Moogsoft State of Availability Report.

Despite this heavy investment, teams are not achieving positive availability outcomes. Perhaps most telling, monitoring tools only catch performance issues or outages about half of the time. Customers flag the rest.

In other words, monitoring tool investments are not paying dividends. They are not helping teams quickly catch data anomalies and expediently fix incidents, and they certainly are not creating a positive customer experience. Yet, DevOps and SREs need monitoring solutions as manually monitoring ever-complex IT ecosystems with ever more data would be impossible.

So what's the secret to modern availability? How can teams better leverage their tools?

The Point Solution Problem: Partial Information

Part of the proliferation of monitoring tools in the IT stack is due to a proliferation of tools in the incident management space in general. Over the past few years, software vendors have introduced a slew of specific point solutions that solve specific problems.

On the positive side, point solutions specialize in monitoring certain aspects of an organization's IT ecosystem: the network, application, IT infrastructure or digital experience. But, problematically, point solutions do not integrate and cannot enable continuous insights across an IT stack. This siloed approach to monitoring:

Costs time and resources

Licensing copious amounts of monitoring tools is expensive. Perhaps even more expensive, human teams need to spend time managing and maintaining these monitoring solutions. And that is likely why research finds engineers spend more time monitoring over any other activity, innovation and value creation included.

Expands operational risk

Siloed approaches to anything — monitoring included — increase operational efficiencies and slow progress. When knowledge sits in one tool, the information tends to get orphaned and this lengthens communication lines and delays incident triage and resolution.

Increases downtime

Issues within the IT ecosystem are typically connected. But, because point solutions lack insight across the entire system, alerts tend to show up in multiple tools, creating a lot of unnecessary noise and further compounding and slowing incident remediation.

The Availability Answer: Use AIOps to Connect Monitoring Tools

To extract value out of monitoring tools and ensure more uptime, engineering teams need to connect their point solutions, creating a single line of sight across the entire incident lifecycle. Domain-agnostic artificial intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) can be this connective tissue. By converging data from all aspects of the incident lifecycle, AIOps connects otherwise siloed point solutions. This integrated approach to monitoring:

Provides a unified dashboard

Point solutions require engineers to hop from tool and tool, monitoring and maintaining various dashboards and charts. AIOps, on the other hand, integrates and aggregates data from across an organization's entire tool stack. As a result, engineering teams can look at one single dashboard that summarizes the health of all of their systems.

Streamlines the incident lifecycle

In addition to providing a summary of system health, AIOps solutions provide one single system of incident engagement. In this incident home base, engineering teams can track the incident lifecycle: detection, notification and resolution. Seeing the full picture of the incident lifecycle in one platform simplifies and speeds the response, and in the meantime, helps engineers understand — and then reduce — the amount of time each phase takes.

Optimizes overall systems

Because AIOps tools take a holistic approach to monitoring, they act as the connective tissue between an organization's monitoring data and help fill data gaps. These solutions make sense of data pulled from multiple point solutions, deduplicating and correlating alerts, enriching data and adding context across systems. This helps teams eliminate noise and identify root causes faster.

Instead of adding another point solution to a growing monitoring toolbox, IT leaders should make their next investment count. And AIOps could be the key. By adopting an AIOps tool, teams understand the whole picture of system health and can sidestep unnecessary noise and alerts to expediently respond to service-disrupting incidents. DevOps and SREs, facing less unplanned work, can invest in the future, paying down technical debt and further increasing system stability.

Richard Whitehead is Chief Evangelist at Moogsoft

Hot Topics

The Latest

Telecommunications is expanding at an unprecedented pace ... But progress brings complexity. As WanAware's 2025 Telecom Observability Benchmark Report reveals, many operators are discovering that modernization requires more than physical build outs and CapEx — it also demands the tools and insights to manage, secure, and optimize this fast-growing infrastructure in real time ...

As businesses increasingly rely on high-performance applications to deliver seamless user experiences, the demand for fast, reliable, and scalable data storage systems has never been greater. Redis — an open-source, in-memory data structure store — has emerged as a popular choice for use cases ranging from caching to real-time analytics. But with great performance comes the need for vigilant monitoring ...

Kubernetes was not initially designed with AI's vast resource variability in mind, and the rapid rise of AI has exposed Kubernetes limitations, particularly when it comes to cost and resource efficiency. Indeed, AI workloads differ from traditional applications in that they require a staggering amount and variety of compute resources, and their consumption is far less consistent than traditional workloads ... Considering the speed of AI innovation, teams cannot afford to be bogged down by these constant infrastructure concerns. A solution is needed ...

AI is the catalyst for significant investment in data teams as enterprises require higher-quality data to power their AI applications, according to the State of Analytics Engineering Report from dbt Labs ...

Misaligned architecture can lead to business consequences, with 93% of respondents reporting negative outcomes such as service disruptions, high operational costs and security challenges ...

A Gartner analyst recently suggested that GenAI tools could create 25% time savings for network operational teams. Where might these time savings come from? How are GenAI tools helping NetOps teams today, and what other tasks might they take on in the future as models continue improving? In general, these savings come from automating or streamlining manual NetOps tasks ...

IT and line-of-business teams are increasingly aligned in their efforts to close the data gap and drive greater collaboration to alleviate IT bottlenecks and offload growing demands on IT teams, according to The 2025 Automation Benchmark Report: Insights from IT Leaders on Enterprise Automation & the Future of AI-Driven Businesses from Jitterbit ...

A large majority (86%) of data management and AI decision makers cite protecting data privacy as a top concern, with 76% of respondents citing ROI on data privacy and AI initiatives across their organization, according to a new Harris Poll from Collibra ...

According to Gartner, Inc. the following six trends will shape the future of cloud over the next four years, ultimately resulting in new ways of working that are digital in nature and transformative in impact ...

2020 was the equivalent of a wedding with a top-shelf open bar. As businesses scrambled to adjust to remote work, digital transformation accelerated at breakneck speed. New software categories emerged overnight. Tech stacks ballooned with all sorts of SaaS apps solving ALL the problems — often with little oversight or long-term integration planning, and yes frequently a lot of duplicated functionality ... But now the music's faded. The lights are on. Everyone from the CIO to the CFO is checking the bill. Welcome to the Great SaaS Hangover ...

You Have 40 Monitoring Tools, Make the Next One Count

Richard Whitehead
Moogsoft

In our growing digital economy, end users have no tolerance for downtime. Consequently, IT leaders invest heavily in availability: DevOps and SRE (site reliability engineering) teams to ensure digital apps and services are continuously available and digital tools built to influence uptime.

As recent research uncovered, IT leaders invest in a lot of single-domain monitoring tools. In fact, teams rely on an average of 16 monitoring tools — and up to 40 — according to the Moogsoft State of Availability Report.

Despite this heavy investment, teams are not achieving positive availability outcomes. Perhaps most telling, monitoring tools only catch performance issues or outages about half of the time. Customers flag the rest.

In other words, monitoring tool investments are not paying dividends. They are not helping teams quickly catch data anomalies and expediently fix incidents, and they certainly are not creating a positive customer experience. Yet, DevOps and SREs need monitoring solutions as manually monitoring ever-complex IT ecosystems with ever more data would be impossible.

So what's the secret to modern availability? How can teams better leverage their tools?

The Point Solution Problem: Partial Information

Part of the proliferation of monitoring tools in the IT stack is due to a proliferation of tools in the incident management space in general. Over the past few years, software vendors have introduced a slew of specific point solutions that solve specific problems.

On the positive side, point solutions specialize in monitoring certain aspects of an organization's IT ecosystem: the network, application, IT infrastructure or digital experience. But, problematically, point solutions do not integrate and cannot enable continuous insights across an IT stack. This siloed approach to monitoring:

Costs time and resources

Licensing copious amounts of monitoring tools is expensive. Perhaps even more expensive, human teams need to spend time managing and maintaining these monitoring solutions. And that is likely why research finds engineers spend more time monitoring over any other activity, innovation and value creation included.

Expands operational risk

Siloed approaches to anything — monitoring included — increase operational efficiencies and slow progress. When knowledge sits in one tool, the information tends to get orphaned and this lengthens communication lines and delays incident triage and resolution.

Increases downtime

Issues within the IT ecosystem are typically connected. But, because point solutions lack insight across the entire system, alerts tend to show up in multiple tools, creating a lot of unnecessary noise and further compounding and slowing incident remediation.

The Availability Answer: Use AIOps to Connect Monitoring Tools

To extract value out of monitoring tools and ensure more uptime, engineering teams need to connect their point solutions, creating a single line of sight across the entire incident lifecycle. Domain-agnostic artificial intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) can be this connective tissue. By converging data from all aspects of the incident lifecycle, AIOps connects otherwise siloed point solutions. This integrated approach to monitoring:

Provides a unified dashboard

Point solutions require engineers to hop from tool and tool, monitoring and maintaining various dashboards and charts. AIOps, on the other hand, integrates and aggregates data from across an organization's entire tool stack. As a result, engineering teams can look at one single dashboard that summarizes the health of all of their systems.

Streamlines the incident lifecycle

In addition to providing a summary of system health, AIOps solutions provide one single system of incident engagement. In this incident home base, engineering teams can track the incident lifecycle: detection, notification and resolution. Seeing the full picture of the incident lifecycle in one platform simplifies and speeds the response, and in the meantime, helps engineers understand — and then reduce — the amount of time each phase takes.

Optimizes overall systems

Because AIOps tools take a holistic approach to monitoring, they act as the connective tissue between an organization's monitoring data and help fill data gaps. These solutions make sense of data pulled from multiple point solutions, deduplicating and correlating alerts, enriching data and adding context across systems. This helps teams eliminate noise and identify root causes faster.

Instead of adding another point solution to a growing monitoring toolbox, IT leaders should make their next investment count. And AIOps could be the key. By adopting an AIOps tool, teams understand the whole picture of system health and can sidestep unnecessary noise and alerts to expediently respond to service-disrupting incidents. DevOps and SREs, facing less unplanned work, can invest in the future, paying down technical debt and further increasing system stability.

Richard Whitehead is Chief Evangelist at Moogsoft

Hot Topics

The Latest

Telecommunications is expanding at an unprecedented pace ... But progress brings complexity. As WanAware's 2025 Telecom Observability Benchmark Report reveals, many operators are discovering that modernization requires more than physical build outs and CapEx — it also demands the tools and insights to manage, secure, and optimize this fast-growing infrastructure in real time ...

As businesses increasingly rely on high-performance applications to deliver seamless user experiences, the demand for fast, reliable, and scalable data storage systems has never been greater. Redis — an open-source, in-memory data structure store — has emerged as a popular choice for use cases ranging from caching to real-time analytics. But with great performance comes the need for vigilant monitoring ...

Kubernetes was not initially designed with AI's vast resource variability in mind, and the rapid rise of AI has exposed Kubernetes limitations, particularly when it comes to cost and resource efficiency. Indeed, AI workloads differ from traditional applications in that they require a staggering amount and variety of compute resources, and their consumption is far less consistent than traditional workloads ... Considering the speed of AI innovation, teams cannot afford to be bogged down by these constant infrastructure concerns. A solution is needed ...

AI is the catalyst for significant investment in data teams as enterprises require higher-quality data to power their AI applications, according to the State of Analytics Engineering Report from dbt Labs ...

Misaligned architecture can lead to business consequences, with 93% of respondents reporting negative outcomes such as service disruptions, high operational costs and security challenges ...

A Gartner analyst recently suggested that GenAI tools could create 25% time savings for network operational teams. Where might these time savings come from? How are GenAI tools helping NetOps teams today, and what other tasks might they take on in the future as models continue improving? In general, these savings come from automating or streamlining manual NetOps tasks ...

IT and line-of-business teams are increasingly aligned in their efforts to close the data gap and drive greater collaboration to alleviate IT bottlenecks and offload growing demands on IT teams, according to The 2025 Automation Benchmark Report: Insights from IT Leaders on Enterprise Automation & the Future of AI-Driven Businesses from Jitterbit ...

A large majority (86%) of data management and AI decision makers cite protecting data privacy as a top concern, with 76% of respondents citing ROI on data privacy and AI initiatives across their organization, according to a new Harris Poll from Collibra ...

According to Gartner, Inc. the following six trends will shape the future of cloud over the next four years, ultimately resulting in new ways of working that are digital in nature and transformative in impact ...

2020 was the equivalent of a wedding with a top-shelf open bar. As businesses scrambled to adjust to remote work, digital transformation accelerated at breakneck speed. New software categories emerged overnight. Tech stacks ballooned with all sorts of SaaS apps solving ALL the problems — often with little oversight or long-term integration planning, and yes frequently a lot of duplicated functionality ... But now the music's faded. The lights are on. Everyone from the CIO to the CFO is checking the bill. Welcome to the Great SaaS Hangover ...