Flying Blind — The 2013 IT Operations Quotient Report
June 11, 2013

Sasha Gilenson
Evolven

Share this

IT Operations is now overwhelmed — by the volume, velocity and variety of change and configuration data, lacking insight or actionable information, all making change and configuration problems a chronic pain.

As shown by recent surveys at the Gartner Data Center Summit and ServiceNow Knowledge13 conferences, where Evolven surveyed over 300 IT Operations professionals asking questions critical to IT operations management, 84% of IT professionals said that they want to significantly improve their IT operations management.

The 2013 IT OQ (Operations Quotient) Report provides a good indication to IT executives as to whether IT ops investments have yielded desired results, using the IT Operations Quotient (OQ), a metric for evaluating operational ability to support existing business services and incoming business requirements.

When an Incident Occurs, Can You Quickly Know What Changed?

Only 7% of the professionals surveys indicated that, using their current IT management tools, they could quickly identify what changed in order to respond to problems and incidents.

The first question IT operations asks themselves when an incident occurs is "what changed?" Due to the complexity and dynamics taking place in the modern data center, with overwhelming configuration data and frequent changes, this question has become quite formidable.

Between applications, environments, and individual instances, mistakes and unauthorized changes happen, demanding that IT ops spend significant amounts of time managing configuration values.

Traditional IT management tools were not designed to deal with the complexity and dynamics of the modern data center. These tools have not been automated to collect data down to granular details, analyzing all changes and consolidating information to extract meaningful information from the sea of raw change and configuration data.

Without systems to manage and organize this growth, IT will drown in its own data.

Can You Automatically Validate that Your Release Deployed Accurately?

Only 8% of the participants surveyed agreed that they could currently automatically validate the accuracy of their deployments. Available release management tools are unprepared for one-off changes or changes that do not follow policy.

IT organizations regularly transition changes to production environments, checking changes throughout a set of pre-production environments.

Now IT is under even more pressure. To meet business requirements, application deployments have accelerated and software deployment schedules have driven up high-paced change activity. The increasingly agile nature of application and infrastructure change requests, leaves IT operations at a loss as they are inundated by change requests that run the gamut from the critical and high priority to the minor and unimportant.

With a typical environment having thousands of different system configuration parameters, any little change can impact performance. So it’s not surprising to see many companies going through painful stabilization periods after a release, as well as production outages.

Even when using automated tools for deployment, the lack of detailed visibility into the release means IT ops can’t ensure accurate, error-free deployments.

Can You Quickly Identify the Incident’s Root Cause?

As shown in this survey, the vast majority of IT professionals surveyed concurred that they lack the capabilities to quickly identify an incident’s root cause. IT organizations find themselves challenged when assessing system failure and tracking down the root cause, such as if a patch wasn't deployed or a server failed.

Any minute misconfiguration or omission of a single configuration parameter can quickly lead to an incident with high impact. With an infinite number of these configuration parameters in play when an environment incident hits, finding the root cause consumes both precious time and manpower, making MTTR woefully high in most organizations.

The root cause of downtime and incidents often start at the most granular level of configuration changes where today's configuration management and change management tools don't provide visibility. The different groups in organizations, like IT Development, Support, and Operations, tend to point the finger of blame for issues, and fail to diagnose or deal with the root cause of the problem.

After a major incident, root cause analysis should focus on root cause of the failure in order to not only resolve the incident but to head off a recurrence. Even when IT teams manage to suppress a failure, and operations can return to "normal", the true root cause may still remain unresolved, leaving the organization exposed to further chaos.

Can You Automatically Verify the Consistency of Your Environments?

From our survey, only 5% of the respondents felt that currently they can automatically verify the consistency of their environments, where they need to go into the fine, granular details and identify the make-up of even minor changes, having to process the enormous amounts of configuration data, for verifying the consistency between servers and environments.

As IT organizations regularly transition changes to production environments, IT teams need to check changes throughout a set of pre-production environments that can include system test, performance test, UAT, staging, etc (changes are also mirrored in a Disaster Recovery environment). IT has sought to diversify their workloads, spreading deployments over multiple IT environments to mitigate risk, yet also doubling complexity.

The high volumes of changes means that not all changes consistently make their way to all environments (pre-prod, prod, DR). The configuration parameters must be validated for consistency in real-time.

IT Operations Analytics Helps

With performance at risk from any disruptions to stability, IT teams need to know exactly what has changed in an environment.

Managing IT environments with intelligent automated analytics will drive more sophisticated proactive processes like comparing environment states, validating releases, and verifying consistency of changes,helping to prevent or identify critical issues. So rather than continue to feed bloated system tools, IT Operations should strive to simplify and implement configuration management based on IT Operations Analytics, and turn the situation around from what can’t be managed to being what can be done about performance and availability.

Sasha Gilenson is the Founder and CEO of Evolven Software.

Share this

The Latest

September 25, 2020

Michael Olson on the AI+ITOPS Podcast: "I really see AIOps as being a core requirement for observability because it ... applies intelligence to your telemetry data and your incident data ... to potentially predict problems before they happen."

September 24, 2020

Enterprise ITOM and ITSM teams have been welcoming of AIOps, believing that it has the potential to deliver great value to them as their IT environments become more distributed, hybrid and complex. Not so with DevOps teams. It's safe to say they've kept AIOps at arm's length, because they don't think it's relevant nor useful for what they do. Instead, to manage the software code they develop and deploy, they've focused on observability ...

September 23, 2020

The post-pandemic environment has resulted in a major shift on where SREs will be located, with nearly 50% of SREs believing they will be working remotely post COVID-19, as compared to only 19% prior to the pandemic, according to the 2020 SRE Survey Report from Catchpoint and the DevOps Institute ...

September 22, 2020

All application traffic travels across the network. While application performance management tools can offer insight into how critical applications are functioning, they do not provide visibility into the broader network environment. In order to optimize application performance, you need a few key capabilities. Let's explore three steps that can help NetOps teams better support the critical applications upon which your business depends ...

September 21, 2020

In Episode 8, Michael Olson, Director of Product Marketing at New Relic, joins the AI+ITOPS Podcast to discuss how AIOps provides real benefits to IT teams ...

September 18, 2020

Will Cappelli on the AI+ITOPS Podcast: "I'll predict that in 5 years time, APM as we know it will have been completely mutated into an observability plus dynamic analytics capability."

September 17, 2020
One of the benefits of doing the EMA Radar Report: AIOps- A Guide for Investing in Innovation was getting data from all 17 vendors on critical areas ranging from deployment and adoption challenges, to cost and pricing, to architectural and functionality insights across everything from heuristics, to automation, and data assimilation ...
September 16, 2020

When you consider that the average end-user interacts with at least 8 applications, then think about how important those applications are in the overall success of the business and how often the interface between the application and the hardware needs to be updated, it's a potential minefield for business operations. Any single update could explode in your face at any time ...

September 15, 2020

Despite the efforts in modernizing and building a robust infrastructure, IT teams routinely deal with the application, database, hardware, or software outages that can last from a few minutes to several days. These types of incidents can cause financial losses to businesses and damage its reputation ...

September 14, 2020

In Episode 7, Will Cappelli, Field CTO of Moogsoft and Former Gartner Research VP, joins the AI+ITOPS Podcast to discuss the future of APM, AIOps and Observability ...