2016 Application Performance Management Predictions - Part 5
December 22, 2015
Share this

Industry experts — from analysts and consultants to users and the top vendors — offer thoughtful, insightful, and often controversial predictions on how APM and related technologies will evolve and impact business in 2016. Part 5, the final installment, highlights the evolving IT environment, and offers a few predictions on the Application Performance Management market.

Start with 2016 Application Performance Management Predictions - Part 1

Start with 2016 Application Performance Management Predictions - Part 2

Start with 2016 Application Performance Management Predictions - Part 3

Start with 2016 Application Performance Management Predictions - Part 4

RELEASE QUALITY – THE NEW APPLICATION PERFORMANCE METRIC

In 2015, less than half of performance and development professionals used Release Quality as a baseline metric to judge application performance according to a report sponsored by HPE and blind survey executed by YouGov. This number is expected to rise in 2016 as organizations fully appreciate that there are no second chances with respect to making a strong first impression based on performance.
Todd DeCapua
Chief Technology Evangelist, Hewlett Packard Enterprise

2016 APM Prediction: Application Performance and Delivery Remain Top-of-Mind

API CHALLENGE DRIVES NEW APM, NPM AND ITOA TOOLS

Businesses will rely on APIs in their application stack more than ever, extending beyond internal business-related web services to infrastructure-related microservice APIs and external partner APIs. Development, QA and operations teams will face new challenges related to the integration of mission-critical services that are managed outside of their department, or even their organization. The concerns of these teams, when working with external service dependencies, are intertwined throughout the entire SDLC. Thus new tools will have to emerge that combine aspects of APM, NPM and ITOA relative to APIs, but more importantly, provide a common interface for easy cross-discipline collaboration between developers, testers and ops.
Neil Mansilla
VP of Developer Relations, Runscope

MICROSERVICES AND CONTAINERS REQUIRE REINVENTION OF APM

There will be increasing challenges for APM providers to be able to support the application (microservices), infrastructure (containers, SDx) and process changes (CI/CD) that are occurring in support of the needs of an increasingly digital business environment.
Cameron Haight
Research VP, IT Operations, Gartner

Perhaps the biggest disruption will be the continued adoption and evolution of microservices and containerization, which have really just started to become commodities. While microservices offer a lot of very compelling advantages, they also bring a new level of complexity to APM. The number of interacting components that make-up a system impacts all areas of troubleshooting, monitoring, logging, and debugging.
Sven Dummer
Senior Director of Product Marketing, Loggly

2016 will be the year where we see adoption of containers and microservices architectures truly skyrockets. It will be critical for APM solutions to provide additional and deeper metrics on containers performance. With modern containerized architectures gaining in terms of flexibility, speed and re-use, in a lot of cases the downside is a lot of additional complexity. APM solutions will need to focus on containers performance and how it maps to the overall application performance. There will be a greater need for higher visibility and additional levels of analytics for container-driven architectures.
Paola Moretto
Founder and CEO, Nouvola

APM has traditionally placed focus on user-facing services, such as web performance which took center stage in recent years. We are now in the rise of micro-service architectures, and in 2016, APM products will retool to focus on service-to-service performance analysis to better serve engineering teams.
Theo Schlossnagle
Founder and EVP, Products, Circonus

APM vendors will have to reinvent their products and business models to take advantage of and cope with Docker and containerization in general. Applications running on one JVM will get disaggregated into hundreds of micro-services, each of which talk to other micro-services on the same and different hosts. Transaction tracing between this "swarm" of micro-services will become essential. This is an enormous technical challenge that only leading edge APM vendors are equipped to meet. APM vendors will also have to revisit their pricing models as charging customers for each instance of each micro-service is simply not going to work.
Bernd Harzog
CEO, OpsDataStore

VENDOR OUTLOOK: CONSOLIDATION

As foreseen in previous years, the APM market continues to develop, both in terms of numbers of providers and inherent functionality, particularly with regard to end user visibility. However, a lack of fundamental differentiation between many of the providers means that consolidation is to be expected, either due to the collapse of (over geared) vendors, or via acquisition.
Larry Haig
Senior Consultant, Intechnica

APM Predictions 2016: Choosing an APM for Maximum Advantage

VENDOR OUTLOOK: THE BATTLE BETWEEN GROWTH PLAYERS AND STARTUPS

If we look at the market as falling into three categories: incumbent players, growth players, and startups, my prediction for 2016 is that the battle between growth players and startups will reach a feverish pitch. Growth players are driving toward going public, or perhaps having recently gone public, are driving overall customer growth. The younger startups in the space, in contrast, are seeking to flesh out differentiated products that will position them to take leadership positions away from growth players in 2017 and eventually from the incumbent players as well. But for 2016, the battle will be for mindshare between the growth players and startups.
Jason Bloomberg
President, Intellyx

Share this

The Latest

March 21, 2019

Achieving audit compliance within your IT ecosystem can be an iterative process, and it doesn't have to be compressed into the five days before the audit is due. Following is a four-step process I use to guide clients through the process of preparing for and successfully completing IT audits ...

March 20, 2019

Network performance issues come in all shapes and sizes, and can require vast amounts of time and resources to solve. Here are three examples of painful network performance issues you're likely to encounter this year, and how NPMD solutions can help you overcome them ...

March 19, 2019

"Scale up" versus "scale out" doesn't just apply to hardware investments, it also has an impact on product features. "Scale up" promotes buying the feature set you think you need now, then adding "feature modules" and licenses as you discover additional feature requirements are needed. Often as networks grow in size they also grow in complexity ...

March 18, 2019

Network Packet Brokers play a critical role in gaining visibility into new complex networks. They deliver the packet data and information IT and security teams need to identify problems, recognize security issues, and ensure overall network performance. However, not all Packet Brokers are created equal when it comes to scalability. Simply "scaling up" your network infrastructure at every growth point is a more complex and more expensive endeavor over time. Let's explore three ways the "scale up" approach to infrastructure growth impedes NetOps and security professionals (and the business as a whole) ...

March 15, 2019

Loyal users are the key to your service desk's success. Happy users want to use your services and they recommend your services in the organization. It takes time and effort to exceed user expectations, but doing so means keeping the promises we make to our users and being careful not to do too much without careful consideration for what's best for the organization and users ...

March 14, 2019

What's the difference between user satisfaction and user loyalty? How can you measure whether your users are satisfied and will keep buying from you? How much effort should you make to offer your users the ultimate experience? If you're a service provider, what matters in the end is whether users will keep coming back to you and will stay loyal ...

March 13, 2019

What if I said that a 95% reduction in the amount of IT noise, 99% reduction in ticket volume and 99% L1 resolution rate are not only possible, but that some of the largest, most complex enterprises in the world see these metrics in their environments every day, thanks to Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)? Would you dismiss that as belonging to the realm of science fiction? ...

March 12, 2019
As a consumer, when you order products online, how do you expect them to get delivered? Some key requirements are: the product must arrive on time, well-packed, and ultimately must give you an easy gateway to return it if it is not as per your expectations. All this has been made possible via a single application. But what if this application doesn't function the way you want or cracks down mid-way, or probably leaks off information about you to some potential hackers? Technical uncertainty and digital chaos are the two double-edged swords dangling over this billion-dollar ecommerce market. Can Quality Assurance and Software Testing save application developers from this endless juggle? ...
March 11, 2019

Of those surveyed, 96% of organizations have a digital transformation strategy, with 57% approaching it as an enterprise-wide priority, with a clear emphasis on speed of business, costs, risk, and customer satisfaction, according to IDC’s Aligning IT Strategies and Business Expectations for Digital Transformation Success, sponsored by EasyVista ...

March 08, 2019

One of my ongoing areas of focus is analytics, AIOps, and the intersection with AI and machine learning more broadly. Within this space, sad to say, semantic confusion surrounding just what these terms mean echoes the confusions surrounding ITSM ...