Skip to main content

3 Considerations When Switching Network Monitoring Systems

Mark Towler
Progress

As remote work persists, and organizations take advantage of hire-from-anywhere models — in addition to facing other challenges like extreme weather events — companies across industries are continuing to re-evaluate the effectiveness of their tech stack. Today's increasingly distributed workforce has put a much greater emphasis on network availability across more endpoints as well as increased the bandwidth required for voice and video. For many, this has posed the question of whether to switch to a new network monitoring system.

For IT leaders, network monitoring is now more crucial than ever. IT teams need the ability to support a more disparate user base who put a greater load on the network and rely upon even more applications. The ability to understand real-time network status and proactively resolve network issues before they impact end users is paramount. For IT leaders, network monitoring is table stakes. However, there are new things to consider when it comes to switching systems — including, yes, the technical nuts and bolts, but first, let's look at operational considerations.

First, Evaluate the Solution's Impact on the Organization's Bottom Line

First and foremost, all tools that make up an organization's tech stack should be as easy on the bottom line as possible. However, once tools are implemented and subscriptions are running, it can be easy to forget about maintenance and evaluation on just how much any given tool costs. And cost increases and fluctuations can come in multiple forms. For IT teams, and network monitoring admins specifically, the main culprits are typically unnecessary runtime and inefficient workflow processes.

First, the right network monitoring solutions enable organizations to get ahead of application end-of-life (EOL) and unnecessary runtime, for example, which can ultimately result in cost savings across a breadth of applications the organization utilizes as a whole.

Additionally, for IT admins, modernized solutions increase productivity and efficiency via more streamlined workflows. When considering a new network monitoring system, IT leaders should consider device-based licensing and solutions that provide real-time, easy access and visibility into application use, needed updates, and upcoming EOL deadlines. When it comes to table stakes capabilities, ease-of-use, automation and integration capabilities, and real-time reporting is key to ensure a more streamlined, efficient workflow — and to ensure the team is aligned with other departments.

Consider the Digital Experience

In today's remote environment, ease-of-use network monitoring itself is much more than tracking application runtime and end-of-life management. In terms of optimizing efficiencies for the network monitoring team, customization when it comes to platform visualization and interactive reporting capabilities are benefits when setting up a new system. However, there is an overall expansion of the role of network monitoring to encompass the entire digital experience.

It's no longer enough to know whether the infrastructure or application is up or down — IT teams need to be able to track the experience of those using that infrastructure. Today's fully remote world now requires the ability to track the end-user's experience in depth, including site lag and slow load times, for example. Being able to monitor the network and the way users are experiencing that network are going to be requirements for network monitoring solutions in the very near future.

Implement Change Management Policies

Whether an organization is switching their network monitoring system in response to an event or simply making an upgrade, it can often feel like a hair-on-fire transition for IT teams. Change is never easy — and with the additional stress put on these teams to ensure everything is working smoothly in today's remote world, IT leaders will find themselves faced with questions like "how fast can we make this transition?" and "does the new system do everything we need?"

To streamline the process and ease stress for IT teams, now is the time for IT leaders to lean on leadership best practices and have discussions with their teams around how to get the most out of the new system. It's easy to get in the weeds in tech, but communication and transparency are currently at the forefront for organizations — across all industries and all departments.

It's important to involve the full team in conversations around new capabilities, what's not available anymore, and how to leverage the new system to access what's needed in the most efficient way possible. For team members, it's important to ask about new features that should be implemented and how the solution integrates and amplifies other tools they need to ensure the use of the new tool to its full potential.

As IT leaders look at a blank slate and prepare to move servers, applications, and other workflow tools to a new system, it's imperative to take a step back to ensure optimal agility and resiliency in the future.

Mark Towler is Senior Product Marketing Manager at Progress

Hot Topics

The Latest

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...

Technology leaders across the federal landscape are facing, and will continue to face, an uphill battle when it comes to fortifying their digital environments against hostile and persistent threat actors. On one hand, they are being asked to push digital transformation ... On the other hand, they are facing the fiscal uncertainty of continuing resolutions (CR) and government shutdowns looming near and far. In the face of these challenges, CIOs, CTOs, and CISOs must figure out how to modernize legacy systems and infrastructure while doing more with less and still defending against external and internal threats ...

Reliability is no longer proven by uptime alone, according to the The SRE Report 2026 from LogicMonitor. In the AI era, it is experienced through speed, consistency, and user trust, and increasingly judged by business impact. As digital services grow more complex and AI systems move into production, traditional monitoring approaches are struggling to keep pace, increasing the need for AI-first observability that spans applications, infrastructure, and the Internet ...

If AI is the engine of a modern organization, then data engineering is the road system beneath it. You can build the most powerful engine in the world, but without paved roads, traffic signals, and bridges that can support its weight, it will stall. In many enterprises, the engine is ready. The roads are not ...

In the world of digital-first business, there is no tolerance for service outages. Businesses know that outages are the quickest way to lose money and customers. For smaller organizations, unplanned downtime could even force the business to close ... A new study from PagerDuty, The State of AI-First Operations, reveals that companies actively incorporating AI into operations now view operational resilience as a growth driver rather than a cost center. But how are they achieving it? ...

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

3 Considerations When Switching Network Monitoring Systems

Mark Towler
Progress

As remote work persists, and organizations take advantage of hire-from-anywhere models — in addition to facing other challenges like extreme weather events — companies across industries are continuing to re-evaluate the effectiveness of their tech stack. Today's increasingly distributed workforce has put a much greater emphasis on network availability across more endpoints as well as increased the bandwidth required for voice and video. For many, this has posed the question of whether to switch to a new network monitoring system.

For IT leaders, network monitoring is now more crucial than ever. IT teams need the ability to support a more disparate user base who put a greater load on the network and rely upon even more applications. The ability to understand real-time network status and proactively resolve network issues before they impact end users is paramount. For IT leaders, network monitoring is table stakes. However, there are new things to consider when it comes to switching systems — including, yes, the technical nuts and bolts, but first, let's look at operational considerations.

First, Evaluate the Solution's Impact on the Organization's Bottom Line

First and foremost, all tools that make up an organization's tech stack should be as easy on the bottom line as possible. However, once tools are implemented and subscriptions are running, it can be easy to forget about maintenance and evaluation on just how much any given tool costs. And cost increases and fluctuations can come in multiple forms. For IT teams, and network monitoring admins specifically, the main culprits are typically unnecessary runtime and inefficient workflow processes.

First, the right network monitoring solutions enable organizations to get ahead of application end-of-life (EOL) and unnecessary runtime, for example, which can ultimately result in cost savings across a breadth of applications the organization utilizes as a whole.

Additionally, for IT admins, modernized solutions increase productivity and efficiency via more streamlined workflows. When considering a new network monitoring system, IT leaders should consider device-based licensing and solutions that provide real-time, easy access and visibility into application use, needed updates, and upcoming EOL deadlines. When it comes to table stakes capabilities, ease-of-use, automation and integration capabilities, and real-time reporting is key to ensure a more streamlined, efficient workflow — and to ensure the team is aligned with other departments.

Consider the Digital Experience

In today's remote environment, ease-of-use network monitoring itself is much more than tracking application runtime and end-of-life management. In terms of optimizing efficiencies for the network monitoring team, customization when it comes to platform visualization and interactive reporting capabilities are benefits when setting up a new system. However, there is an overall expansion of the role of network monitoring to encompass the entire digital experience.

It's no longer enough to know whether the infrastructure or application is up or down — IT teams need to be able to track the experience of those using that infrastructure. Today's fully remote world now requires the ability to track the end-user's experience in depth, including site lag and slow load times, for example. Being able to monitor the network and the way users are experiencing that network are going to be requirements for network monitoring solutions in the very near future.

Implement Change Management Policies

Whether an organization is switching their network monitoring system in response to an event or simply making an upgrade, it can often feel like a hair-on-fire transition for IT teams. Change is never easy — and with the additional stress put on these teams to ensure everything is working smoothly in today's remote world, IT leaders will find themselves faced with questions like "how fast can we make this transition?" and "does the new system do everything we need?"

To streamline the process and ease stress for IT teams, now is the time for IT leaders to lean on leadership best practices and have discussions with their teams around how to get the most out of the new system. It's easy to get in the weeds in tech, but communication and transparency are currently at the forefront for organizations — across all industries and all departments.

It's important to involve the full team in conversations around new capabilities, what's not available anymore, and how to leverage the new system to access what's needed in the most efficient way possible. For team members, it's important to ask about new features that should be implemented and how the solution integrates and amplifies other tools they need to ensure the use of the new tool to its full potential.

As IT leaders look at a blank slate and prepare to move servers, applications, and other workflow tools to a new system, it's imperative to take a step back to ensure optimal agility and resiliency in the future.

Mark Towler is Senior Product Marketing Manager at Progress

Hot Topics

The Latest

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...

Technology leaders across the federal landscape are facing, and will continue to face, an uphill battle when it comes to fortifying their digital environments against hostile and persistent threat actors. On one hand, they are being asked to push digital transformation ... On the other hand, they are facing the fiscal uncertainty of continuing resolutions (CR) and government shutdowns looming near and far. In the face of these challenges, CIOs, CTOs, and CISOs must figure out how to modernize legacy systems and infrastructure while doing more with less and still defending against external and internal threats ...

Reliability is no longer proven by uptime alone, according to the The SRE Report 2026 from LogicMonitor. In the AI era, it is experienced through speed, consistency, and user trust, and increasingly judged by business impact. As digital services grow more complex and AI systems move into production, traditional monitoring approaches are struggling to keep pace, increasing the need for AI-first observability that spans applications, infrastructure, and the Internet ...

If AI is the engine of a modern organization, then data engineering is the road system beneath it. You can build the most powerful engine in the world, but without paved roads, traffic signals, and bridges that can support its weight, it will stall. In many enterprises, the engine is ready. The roads are not ...

In the world of digital-first business, there is no tolerance for service outages. Businesses know that outages are the quickest way to lose money and customers. For smaller organizations, unplanned downtime could even force the business to close ... A new study from PagerDuty, The State of AI-First Operations, reveals that companies actively incorporating AI into operations now view operational resilience as a growth driver rather than a cost center. But how are they achieving it? ...

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...