Skip to main content

8 Takeaways on the State of Observability for Energy and Utilities

Peter Pezaris
New Relic

In June, New Relic published the State of Observability for Energy and Utilities Report to share insights, analysis, and data on the impact of full-stack observability software in energy and utilities organizations' service capabilities.

  

Source: National Grid

Here are eight key takeaways from the report:

1. Outages Cost Energy and Utilities Companies More than Any Other Industry

The report found that high-impact-outages affect energy and utilities more than any other industry, with 40% experiencing outages at least once per week compared to 32% across all other industries surveyed. Consequently, the median annual downtime for energy and utility organizations was 37 hours, with 61% of respondents reporting that their mean time to resolve (MTTR) is at least 30 minutes to resolve outages. Each second during an outage comes with a price tag. More than half of energy and utilities organizations (52%) shared that critical business app outages cost at least $500,000 per hour, and 34% indicated that outages cost at least $1 million per hour.

2. Observability Increases Productivity

Since adopting observability solutions, energy and utilities companies have experienced substantial productivity improvements. Of those surveyed, 78% said their MTTR has somewhat improved. Further, organizations with full-stack observability noted even more significant MTTR progress, with 87% reporting improvements.

3. Increased Focus on Security, Governance, Risk, and Compliance is Driving Observability Adoption

For energy and utility organizations, the top technology trend driving the need for observability was an increased focus on security, governance, risk, and compliance (44%), followed by the adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies (36%) and customer experience management (36%).

4. Observability Tooling Deployment is on the Rise

Organizations are prioritizing investment in observability tooling, which includes security monitoring (68%), network monitoring (66%), and infrastructure monitoring (60%). Notably, energy and utility organizations reported high levels of deployment for AIOps (AI for IT operations) capabilities, including anomaly detection, indecent intelligence, and root cause analysis (55%). In fact, by mid-2026, 89% of respondents plan to have deployed AIOps.

5. Energy and Utilities Companies are More Likely to Use Multiple Monitoring Tools

Energy and utilities organizations showed a higher tendency than average to utilize multiple monitoring tools across the 17 observability capabilities included in the study. In fact, three-fourths (75%) of respondents used four or more tools for observability, and 24% used eight or more tools. However, over the next year, 36% indicated that their organization is likely to consolidate tools.

6. Organizations are Maximizing the Value of Observability Spend

Out of all industries surveyed, energy and utilities organizations indicated the highest annual observability spend, with more than two-thirds (68%) spending at least $500,000 and 46% spending at least $1 million per year on observability tooling. In turn, organizations are planning to maximize the return on investment (ROI) on observability spending in the next year by training staff on how best to use their observability tools (48%), optimizing their engineering team size (42%), and consolidating tools (36%). Energy and utility companies stated that their organizations receive a significantly higher total annual value from observability than average, with 76% reporting receiving more than $500,000 from its observability investment per year, 66% stating $1 million or more, and 41% attaining $5 million or more per year in total value. The numbers reported around annual spending and annual value received reflect nearly a 3x median ROI, or 192%.

7. Observability Increases Business Value

Energy and utilities companies reported that observability improves their lives in several ways. Half of IT decision-makers (ITDMs) expressed that observability helps establish a technology strategy, and 46% said it enables data visualization from a single dashboard. Practitioners indicated that observability increases productivity so they can detect and resolve issues faster (43%) and allows less guesswork when managing complicated and distributed tech stacks (35%). Respondents also noted benefits enabled by observability, including increased operational efficiency (39%), improved system uptime and reliability (35%), security vulnerability management (35%), and improved real-user experience (29%). Ultimately, organizations concluded that observability provides numerous positive business outcomes, including improving collaboration across teams to make decisions related to the software stack (42%), creating revenue-generating use cases (35%), and quantifying the business impact of events and incidents with telemetry data (33%).

8. The Future is Bright for Observability Tooling Deployment

Energy and utilities companies are enthusiastic about their observability deployment plans over the next one to three years. By mid-2026, 99% of respondents expect to have deployed several monitoring tools, including security monitoring, database monitoring, and network monitoring, followed by 96% of organizations anticipating alerts and application performance monitoring. Methodology: New Relic's annual observability forecast offers insights into how observability influences organizations and their decision-makers. To gauge the current observability landscape, professionals from various industries and regions were surveyed. Among the 1,700 technology practitioners and decision-makers surveyed, 132 were associated with the energy and utilities sectors.

Peter Pezaris is Chief Design and Strategy Officer at New Relic

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

8 Takeaways on the State of Observability for Energy and Utilities

Peter Pezaris
New Relic

In June, New Relic published the State of Observability for Energy and Utilities Report to share insights, analysis, and data on the impact of full-stack observability software in energy and utilities organizations' service capabilities.

  

Source: National Grid

Here are eight key takeaways from the report:

1. Outages Cost Energy and Utilities Companies More than Any Other Industry

The report found that high-impact-outages affect energy and utilities more than any other industry, with 40% experiencing outages at least once per week compared to 32% across all other industries surveyed. Consequently, the median annual downtime for energy and utility organizations was 37 hours, with 61% of respondents reporting that their mean time to resolve (MTTR) is at least 30 minutes to resolve outages. Each second during an outage comes with a price tag. More than half of energy and utilities organizations (52%) shared that critical business app outages cost at least $500,000 per hour, and 34% indicated that outages cost at least $1 million per hour.

2. Observability Increases Productivity

Since adopting observability solutions, energy and utilities companies have experienced substantial productivity improvements. Of those surveyed, 78% said their MTTR has somewhat improved. Further, organizations with full-stack observability noted even more significant MTTR progress, with 87% reporting improvements.

3. Increased Focus on Security, Governance, Risk, and Compliance is Driving Observability Adoption

For energy and utility organizations, the top technology trend driving the need for observability was an increased focus on security, governance, risk, and compliance (44%), followed by the adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies (36%) and customer experience management (36%).

4. Observability Tooling Deployment is on the Rise

Organizations are prioritizing investment in observability tooling, which includes security monitoring (68%), network monitoring (66%), and infrastructure monitoring (60%). Notably, energy and utility organizations reported high levels of deployment for AIOps (AI for IT operations) capabilities, including anomaly detection, indecent intelligence, and root cause analysis (55%). In fact, by mid-2026, 89% of respondents plan to have deployed AIOps.

5. Energy and Utilities Companies are More Likely to Use Multiple Monitoring Tools

Energy and utilities organizations showed a higher tendency than average to utilize multiple monitoring tools across the 17 observability capabilities included in the study. In fact, three-fourths (75%) of respondents used four or more tools for observability, and 24% used eight or more tools. However, over the next year, 36% indicated that their organization is likely to consolidate tools.

6. Organizations are Maximizing the Value of Observability Spend

Out of all industries surveyed, energy and utilities organizations indicated the highest annual observability spend, with more than two-thirds (68%) spending at least $500,000 and 46% spending at least $1 million per year on observability tooling. In turn, organizations are planning to maximize the return on investment (ROI) on observability spending in the next year by training staff on how best to use their observability tools (48%), optimizing their engineering team size (42%), and consolidating tools (36%). Energy and utility companies stated that their organizations receive a significantly higher total annual value from observability than average, with 76% reporting receiving more than $500,000 from its observability investment per year, 66% stating $1 million or more, and 41% attaining $5 million or more per year in total value. The numbers reported around annual spending and annual value received reflect nearly a 3x median ROI, or 192%.

7. Observability Increases Business Value

Energy and utilities companies reported that observability improves their lives in several ways. Half of IT decision-makers (ITDMs) expressed that observability helps establish a technology strategy, and 46% said it enables data visualization from a single dashboard. Practitioners indicated that observability increases productivity so they can detect and resolve issues faster (43%) and allows less guesswork when managing complicated and distributed tech stacks (35%). Respondents also noted benefits enabled by observability, including increased operational efficiency (39%), improved system uptime and reliability (35%), security vulnerability management (35%), and improved real-user experience (29%). Ultimately, organizations concluded that observability provides numerous positive business outcomes, including improving collaboration across teams to make decisions related to the software stack (42%), creating revenue-generating use cases (35%), and quantifying the business impact of events and incidents with telemetry data (33%).

8. The Future is Bright for Observability Tooling Deployment

Energy and utilities companies are enthusiastic about their observability deployment plans over the next one to three years. By mid-2026, 99% of respondents expect to have deployed several monitoring tools, including security monitoring, database monitoring, and network monitoring, followed by 96% of organizations anticipating alerts and application performance monitoring. Methodology: New Relic's annual observability forecast offers insights into how observability influences organizations and their decision-makers. To gauge the current observability landscape, professionals from various industries and regions were surveyed. Among the 1,700 technology practitioners and decision-makers surveyed, 132 were associated with the energy and utilities sectors.

Peter Pezaris is Chief Design and Strategy Officer at New Relic

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...