Skip to main content

8 Takeaways on the State of Observability for Energy and Utilities

Peter Pezaris
New Relic

In June, New Relic published the State of Observability for Energy and Utilities Report to share insights, analysis, and data on the impact of full-stack observability software in energy and utilities organizations' service capabilities.

  

Source: National Grid

Here are eight key takeaways from the report:

1. Outages Cost Energy and Utilities Companies More than Any Other Industry

The report found that high-impact-outages affect energy and utilities more than any other industry, with 40% experiencing outages at least once per week compared to 32% across all other industries surveyed. Consequently, the median annual downtime for energy and utility organizations was 37 hours, with 61% of respondents reporting that their mean time to resolve (MTTR) is at least 30 minutes to resolve outages. Each second during an outage comes with a price tag. More than half of energy and utilities organizations (52%) shared that critical business app outages cost at least $500,000 per hour, and 34% indicated that outages cost at least $1 million per hour.

2. Observability Increases Productivity

Since adopting observability solutions, energy and utilities companies have experienced substantial productivity improvements. Of those surveyed, 78% said their MTTR has somewhat improved. Further, organizations with full-stack observability noted even more significant MTTR progress, with 87% reporting improvements.

3. Increased Focus on Security, Governance, Risk, and Compliance is Driving Observability Adoption

For energy and utility organizations, the top technology trend driving the need for observability was an increased focus on security, governance, risk, and compliance (44%), followed by the adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies (36%) and customer experience management (36%).

4. Observability Tooling Deployment is on the Rise

Organizations are prioritizing investment in observability tooling, which includes security monitoring (68%), network monitoring (66%), and infrastructure monitoring (60%). Notably, energy and utility organizations reported high levels of deployment for AIOps (AI for IT operations) capabilities, including anomaly detection, indecent intelligence, and root cause analysis (55%). In fact, by mid-2026, 89% of respondents plan to have deployed AIOps.

5. Energy and Utilities Companies are More Likely to Use Multiple Monitoring Tools

Energy and utilities organizations showed a higher tendency than average to utilize multiple monitoring tools across the 17 observability capabilities included in the study. In fact, three-fourths (75%) of respondents used four or more tools for observability, and 24% used eight or more tools. However, over the next year, 36% indicated that their organization is likely to consolidate tools.

6. Organizations are Maximizing the Value of Observability Spend

Out of all industries surveyed, energy and utilities organizations indicated the highest annual observability spend, with more than two-thirds (68%) spending at least $500,000 and 46% spending at least $1 million per year on observability tooling. In turn, organizations are planning to maximize the return on investment (ROI) on observability spending in the next year by training staff on how best to use their observability tools (48%), optimizing their engineering team size (42%), and consolidating tools (36%). Energy and utility companies stated that their organizations receive a significantly higher total annual value from observability than average, with 76% reporting receiving more than $500,000 from its observability investment per year, 66% stating $1 million or more, and 41% attaining $5 million or more per year in total value. The numbers reported around annual spending and annual value received reflect nearly a 3x median ROI, or 192%.

7. Observability Increases Business Value

Energy and utilities companies reported that observability improves their lives in several ways. Half of IT decision-makers (ITDMs) expressed that observability helps establish a technology strategy, and 46% said it enables data visualization from a single dashboard. Practitioners indicated that observability increases productivity so they can detect and resolve issues faster (43%) and allows less guesswork when managing complicated and distributed tech stacks (35%). Respondents also noted benefits enabled by observability, including increased operational efficiency (39%), improved system uptime and reliability (35%), security vulnerability management (35%), and improved real-user experience (29%). Ultimately, organizations concluded that observability provides numerous positive business outcomes, including improving collaboration across teams to make decisions related to the software stack (42%), creating revenue-generating use cases (35%), and quantifying the business impact of events and incidents with telemetry data (33%).

8. The Future is Bright for Observability Tooling Deployment

Energy and utilities companies are enthusiastic about their observability deployment plans over the next one to three years. By mid-2026, 99% of respondents expect to have deployed several monitoring tools, including security monitoring, database monitoring, and network monitoring, followed by 96% of organizations anticipating alerts and application performance monitoring. Methodology: New Relic's annual observability forecast offers insights into how observability influences organizations and their decision-makers. To gauge the current observability landscape, professionals from various industries and regions were surveyed. Among the 1,700 technology practitioners and decision-makers surveyed, 132 were associated with the energy and utilities sectors.

Peter Pezaris is Chief Design and Strategy Officer at New Relic

Hot Topics

The Latest

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

8 Takeaways on the State of Observability for Energy and Utilities

Peter Pezaris
New Relic

In June, New Relic published the State of Observability for Energy and Utilities Report to share insights, analysis, and data on the impact of full-stack observability software in energy and utilities organizations' service capabilities.

  

Source: National Grid

Here are eight key takeaways from the report:

1. Outages Cost Energy and Utilities Companies More than Any Other Industry

The report found that high-impact-outages affect energy and utilities more than any other industry, with 40% experiencing outages at least once per week compared to 32% across all other industries surveyed. Consequently, the median annual downtime for energy and utility organizations was 37 hours, with 61% of respondents reporting that their mean time to resolve (MTTR) is at least 30 minutes to resolve outages. Each second during an outage comes with a price tag. More than half of energy and utilities organizations (52%) shared that critical business app outages cost at least $500,000 per hour, and 34% indicated that outages cost at least $1 million per hour.

2. Observability Increases Productivity

Since adopting observability solutions, energy and utilities companies have experienced substantial productivity improvements. Of those surveyed, 78% said their MTTR has somewhat improved. Further, organizations with full-stack observability noted even more significant MTTR progress, with 87% reporting improvements.

3. Increased Focus on Security, Governance, Risk, and Compliance is Driving Observability Adoption

For energy and utility organizations, the top technology trend driving the need for observability was an increased focus on security, governance, risk, and compliance (44%), followed by the adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies (36%) and customer experience management (36%).

4. Observability Tooling Deployment is on the Rise

Organizations are prioritizing investment in observability tooling, which includes security monitoring (68%), network monitoring (66%), and infrastructure monitoring (60%). Notably, energy and utility organizations reported high levels of deployment for AIOps (AI for IT operations) capabilities, including anomaly detection, indecent intelligence, and root cause analysis (55%). In fact, by mid-2026, 89% of respondents plan to have deployed AIOps.

5. Energy and Utilities Companies are More Likely to Use Multiple Monitoring Tools

Energy and utilities organizations showed a higher tendency than average to utilize multiple monitoring tools across the 17 observability capabilities included in the study. In fact, three-fourths (75%) of respondents used four or more tools for observability, and 24% used eight or more tools. However, over the next year, 36% indicated that their organization is likely to consolidate tools.

6. Organizations are Maximizing the Value of Observability Spend

Out of all industries surveyed, energy and utilities organizations indicated the highest annual observability spend, with more than two-thirds (68%) spending at least $500,000 and 46% spending at least $1 million per year on observability tooling. In turn, organizations are planning to maximize the return on investment (ROI) on observability spending in the next year by training staff on how best to use their observability tools (48%), optimizing their engineering team size (42%), and consolidating tools (36%). Energy and utility companies stated that their organizations receive a significantly higher total annual value from observability than average, with 76% reporting receiving more than $500,000 from its observability investment per year, 66% stating $1 million or more, and 41% attaining $5 million or more per year in total value. The numbers reported around annual spending and annual value received reflect nearly a 3x median ROI, or 192%.

7. Observability Increases Business Value

Energy and utilities companies reported that observability improves their lives in several ways. Half of IT decision-makers (ITDMs) expressed that observability helps establish a technology strategy, and 46% said it enables data visualization from a single dashboard. Practitioners indicated that observability increases productivity so they can detect and resolve issues faster (43%) and allows less guesswork when managing complicated and distributed tech stacks (35%). Respondents also noted benefits enabled by observability, including increased operational efficiency (39%), improved system uptime and reliability (35%), security vulnerability management (35%), and improved real-user experience (29%). Ultimately, organizations concluded that observability provides numerous positive business outcomes, including improving collaboration across teams to make decisions related to the software stack (42%), creating revenue-generating use cases (35%), and quantifying the business impact of events and incidents with telemetry data (33%).

8. The Future is Bright for Observability Tooling Deployment

Energy and utilities companies are enthusiastic about their observability deployment plans over the next one to three years. By mid-2026, 99% of respondents expect to have deployed several monitoring tools, including security monitoring, database monitoring, and network monitoring, followed by 96% of organizations anticipating alerts and application performance monitoring. Methodology: New Relic's annual observability forecast offers insights into how observability influences organizations and their decision-makers. To gauge the current observability landscape, professionals from various industries and regions were surveyed. Among the 1,700 technology practitioners and decision-makers surveyed, 132 were associated with the energy and utilities sectors.

Peter Pezaris is Chief Design and Strategy Officer at New Relic

Hot Topics

The Latest

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...