90% Experience Barriers to IoT
December 05, 2018
Share this

One in four Global Fortune 2000 enterprises rank Internet of Things (IoT) deployment as the most important initiative in their organization, yet 90% experience barriers to effective implementation and expansion due to lack of IoT expertise and skills in-house, according to a new independent survey from VansonBourne sponsored by Software AG.

98% of respondents stated that they are already generating some level of return from their IoT investments yet 89% still believe that they must improve their approach to IoT to further improve ROI.

Most respondents report achieving specific business benefits from their early IoT implementations with 39% citing production capacity increases and higher customer satisfaction and 38% making better informed business decisions. Respondents with the highest rate of satisfaction with their IoT deployments used a hybrid implementation approach – namely buying an IoT platform from an external vendor and then building upon it with customization done in-house, giving them the flexibility, they require within the framework of a reliable platform.

According to the survey, the biggest barrier to effective IoT implementation is lack of internal expertise and skills according to 31% of respondents. Other barriers include the inability to manage and process large volumes of data (29%), integration issues (28%), too many legacy systems (28%), inability to scale the network to meet IoT demands (26%) and cybersecurity challenges (25%).

The majority of respondents (93%) employed some level of hybrid approach to IoT implementation — both buying an IoT platform from an external vendor and then adding customization internally. When evaluating IoT platform vendors, respondents stated that they are looking for an innovative partner (46%), with a solution that an be easily integrated across an entire organization (40%), with customization that suits their specific needs (39%).

“Organizations know they cannot deliver IoT with off-the-shelf packaged applications or with ground-up in-house builds,” said Raj Datta, President, Software AG North America. “They need to rapidly deploy IoT in way that is easy to customize, open enough to seamlessly integrate with their existing landscape while remaining proven, secure and robust. This points to the need for a platform with rich functionality out-of-the-box that still gives customers the ability to quickly create business solutions to suit their unique needs.”

Datta pointed out that 72% of survey respondents feel their IoT platform vendor could and should be doing more to help them. And, they want to realize better IoT platform functionality with 49% seeing high reliability and 48% seeking enhanced security as two key attributes they want from their external vendor IoT platforms. Furthermore, as more organizations seek carrier-grade IoT platforms, they will continue to depend on external vendors to achieve that level of stealth functionality and reliability.

98% of respondents stated that all business processes ... expect to be positively impacted by IoT

Most organizations are still in the early stages of their IoT implementations which explains why 89% of survey respondents believe that their organization needs to improve its plans for IoT. At the same time, there is tremendous optimism and confidence regarding how their IoT implementations can transform their organizations and make them more competitive in the future. 98% of respondents stated that all business processes and functions within their organizations have been or expect to be positively impacted by IoT. Those functions include customer service/relationships, product/service delivery, supply chain management, marketing/sales, product/service development, employee/HR processes, infrastructure management, contact center/support, accounting/finance and administration.

Regarding IoT deployment in 2019 and beyond, most organizations are looking to deploy IoT on the edge but are struggling to do so — 80% of respondents want to deploy IoT on the edge but only 8% are actually doing that today. By combining IoT and edge computing, organizations can shift the workload of processing IoT data closer to, or in some cases on the device itself. For example, instead of sending all the data from a wind turbine to the cloud and processing the data centrally, users can process data and analytics locally and then send the results to the cloud. This reduces network load, cloud processing and storage requirements while making IoT in areas without reliable networks possible.

According to market research firm IDC, the IT spend on edge infrastructure will reach up to 18% of the total spend on IoT infrastructure by 2020. That spend is driven by the deployment of converged IT and OT systems which reduces the time to value of data collected from their connected devices.

Methodology: The survey queried 800 senior IT and business decision makers at organizations with a global annual revenue of $500M and higher across 13 different countries in North America, Europe and Asia Pacific. The respondents came from organizations that were deploying IoT platforms and the respondents themselves had some level of involvement and responsibility for selecting and maintaining those solutions.

Share this

The Latest

February 14, 2019

Part 3 of our three-part blog series on the shortcomings of traditional APM solutions for monitoring microservices based applications explains how the alerting and troubleshooting capabilities of traditional APM do not address the evolving requirements of monitoring microservices based applications ...

February 13, 2019

In a digital world where the speed of innovation matters, are you anchored down by legacy APM agents? ...

February 12, 2019

In a digital world where customer experience defines your business, is your APM solution doing its job? This may seem like a strange question to open a technical blog on Application Performance Management (APM), but it's not. With customer experience today largely driven by software, we think there's no more important question to ask ...

February 11, 2019

According to the NetEnrich 2019 Cloud Adoption survey, 68% of enterprise IT departments are using public cloud infrastructure today, and 27% of respondents said that doing so is part of their near-term plan ...

February 08, 2019

Organizations and their IT teams are not in sync when pursuing their digital transformation strategies, according to a new report released today by The Economist Intelligence Unit ...

February 07, 2019

Having the right tools and good visibility are critical to understanding what's going on in your network and applications. However, as networks become more complex and hybrid in nature, organizations can no longer afford to be reactive and rely only on portable diagnostic tools. They need real-time, comprehensive visibility ...

February 06, 2019

When building out new services, SaaS providers need to keep in mind a set of best practices and "habits of success," which cover their organization's culture, relationships with third-party providers and customers, and overall strategic decisions and operational know-how. If you're a SaaS application provider, here are five considerations you need to keep in mind ...

February 05, 2019

In the coming weeks, EMA will be gathering data on what we believe is a unique research topic — approaching DevOps initiatives from the perspectives of all key constituents. We're doing this to try to break through some of the "false walls" created by more niche, market-defined insights, or some of our industry hyperbole. Here are some of the directions we're pursuing ...

February 01, 2019

An application on your network is running slow. Before you even understand what the problem is, the network is blamed for the issue. This puts network teams in a dangerous position — guilty until proven innocent. Even when network teams are sure an issue doesn't stem from a network problem, they are still forced to prove it, spending sometimes significant amounts of time going through troubleshooting processes, looking for a problem that doesn't exist ...

January 31, 2019

Tap and SPAN. It's the same thing, right? That answer would be wrong. Some network engineers may not know the difference, but there are definitely clear and distinct differences between these two types of devices. Understanding these differences will help you elevate your game when it comes to network performance monitoring and application performance monitoring ...