This question is really two questions.
The first would be: What's really going on in terms of a confusion of terms? — as we wrestle with AIOps, IT Operational Analytics, big data, AI bots, machine learning, and more generically stated "AI platforms" (… and the list is far from complete).
The second might be phrased as: What's really going on in terms of real-world advanced IT analytics deployments — where are they succeeding, and where are they not?
This blog will look at both questions as a way of introducing EMA's newest research with data just coming in from North America and Europe (UK, Germany and France). Like this blog, our research will also examine both questions, with the weight on examining real-world deployments. We hope to have at least a few real answers for you by September, with fresh data and timely analysis.
A Term by Any Other Name …
I'm borrowing, admittedly, from Shakespeare, to suggest that buzzwords in tech often get in the way of understanding real value, even as they seek to clarify it. In the case of what EMA prefers to call "advanced IT analytics" the fugal use of AI, machine learning, and big data, among other terms, often confuses what's really afoot. The real value is almost always in the mixture of science and artistry with which the analytics are applied to various use cases, not a purely academic discussion about what heuristics lie underneath the hood.
But EMA believes there is nevertheless a commonality across all true AIA solutions.
Last summer, EMA embarked on research that strongly indicates that there are common benefits, requirements and challenge surrounding an investment in AIA. Some of the more dramatic benefits typically included values in unifying IT across silos, toolset consolidation, dramatic reductions in mean-time-to-repair and mean time between failures, as well as other use cases that typically ranged from performance and availability management, to change management and capacity optimization, to support for DevOps and SecOps, to optimizing migrations to public cloud. As such we view AIA as a potentially transformative arena for both IT and the business it serves.
In our current research, we will be asking some simple questions regarding terminology and attributes to test the waters, especially in the now prevalent area of AIOps. But we'll also be able to track deployments centering on big data, security-related analytics, capacity-specific analytics and end-user or customer experience analytics, to see what patterns emerge and how they actually differ.
How Do You Make it All Real?
What's currently afoot in operationalizing advanced analytics for IT?
This is the main focus for our research, and it will also help to inform on the first question — what people are actually doing when they champion AIOps, or big data, etc.
Some areas of focus include:
■ Use cases: Here we are expanding on capacity, security and end-user experience to include cross-domain application/infrastructure availability and performance, DevOps/agile, cost management (including hybrid and multi-cloud), change management, and IoT.
■ Leadership: Who's leading in investments in advanced IT analytics, and who's leading in overseeing and actually delivering on deployments? What are their objectives, and how are they going about it?
■ Best practices: Are there any consistent best practices that emerge from the usual laundry list when advanced analytics are being deployed and used? If so, what are they? And how effective are they?
■ Integrations: How much are investments in advanced analytics being used to assimilate and optimize other toolsets?
■ Automation: What are the current priorities for integrated automation, where AI and machine learning can help to intelligently and adaptively drive more automated outcomes?
■ AI bots: Along with general automation priorities, we are looking at AI bot strategies to see how they converge (or don't) with AIOps and other analytics investments.
■ Technology and data sources: What data sets are IT organizations most hungry for when it comes to advanced analytics? What heuristics do they feel are most critical now, and in the future? How is service modeling and dependency mapping playing in the advanced IT analytics arena?
■ Roadblocks and benefits: What are the major obstacles remaining in 2018 to effective advanced IT analytics deployments? And what are the more prevalent benefits achieved?
These are admittedly a lot of areas for examination, and once again, the list is not complete. Moreover, we plan to investigate the answers we receive for all these questions from various perspectives, including company size, vertical, geography, roles (what do IT executives think versus more hands-on stakeholders?), success rates and other factors.
Finally, we'll be looking for trends based on the research done in two prior reports: Advanced IT Analytics: A Look at Real-World Adoptions in the Real World March 2016, and The Many Faces of Advanced Operations Analytics September 2014.
What I'm hoping we'll see in September is continued growth toward a more mature, more business-aligned, and more IT-unifying approach to advanced analytics deployments, with a growing number of stakeholders and benefits. I'm also hoping for a more definitive set of AIA profiles, as operations analytics continues to redefine itself away from just "big data," and as the need for more evolved, holistic and dynamic multi-use-case AIA platforms becomes more pronounced.
But it's too soon to tell. The data is still coming in. Nevertheless, I should know soon. In a follow-up blog in the first-half of September I'll be able to present some real news.
While remote work policies have been gaining steam for the better part of the past decade across the enterprise space — driven in large part by more agile and scalable, cloud-delivered business solutions — recent events have pushed adoption into overdrive ...
Time-critical, unplanned work caused by IT disruptions continues to plague enterprises around the world, leading to lost revenue, significant employee morale problems and missed opportunities to innovate, according to the State of Unplanned Work Report 2020, conducted by Dimensional Research for PagerDuty ...
In today's iterative world, development teams care a lot more about how apps are running. There's a demand for fixing actionable items. Developers want to know exactly what's broken, what to fix right now, and what can wait. They want to know, "Do we build or fix?" This trade-off between building new features versus fixing bugs is one of the key factors behind the adoption of Application Stability management tools ...
With the rise of mobile apps and iterative development releases, Application Stability has answered the widespread need to monitor applications in a new way, shifting the focus from servers and networks to the customer experience. The emergence of Application Stability has caused some consternation for diehard APM fans. However, these two solutions embody very distinct monitoring focuses, which leads me to believe there's room for both tools, as well as different teams for both ...
The 2019 State of E-Commerce Infrastructure Report, from Webscale, analyzes findings from a comprehensive survey of more than 450 ecommerce professionals regarding how their online stores performed during the 2019 holiday season. Some key insights from the report include ...
Robinhood is a unicorn startup that has been disrupting the way by which many millennials have been investing and managing their money for the past few years. For Robinhood, the burden of proof was to show that they can provide an infrastructure that is as scalable, reliable and secure as that of major banks who have been developing their trading infrastructure for the last quarter-century. That promise fell flat last week, when the market volatility brought about a set of edge cases that brought Robinhood's trading app to its knees ...
Application backend monitoring is the key to acquiring visibility across the enterprise's application stack, from the application layer and underlying infrastructure to third-party API services, web servers and databases, be they on-premises, in a public or private cloud, or in a hybrid model. By tracking and reporting performance in real time, IT teams can ensure applications perform at peak efficiency — and guarantee a seamless customer experience. How can IT operations teams improve application backend monitoring? By embracing artificial intelligence for operations — AIOps ...
In 2020, DevOps teams will face heightened expectations for higher speed and frequency of code delivery, which means their IT environments will become even more modular, ephemeral and dynamic — and significantly more complicated to monitor. As a result, AIOps will further cement its position as the most effective technology that DevOps teams can use to see and control what's going on with their applications and their underlying infrastructure, so that they can prevent outages. Here I outline five key trends to watch related to how AIOps will impact DevOps in 2020 and beyond ...
With the spread of the coronavirus (COVID-19), CIOs should focus on three short-term actions to increase their organizations' resilience against disruptions and prepare for rebound and growth, according to Gartner ...
Whether you consider the first generation of APM or the updates that followed for SOA and microservices, the most basic premise of the tools remains the same — PROVIDE VISIBILITY ...