Skip to main content

Aging IT Infrastructure Drives IT Budget Increases in 2019

Nine out of ten (89 percent) companies expect their IT budgets to grow or remain flat in 2019. Although factors driving budget increases vary significantly by company size, 64 percent of those planning to increase budgets are doing so to upgrade outdated IT infrastructure, according to the 2019 State of IT Budgets report from Spiceworks.

Across all company sizes, 38 percent of organizations expect IT budgets to increase in 2019, and 51 percent expect them to remain flat year over year. Organizations that expect budget increases next year anticipate a 20 percent increase on average, up from 19 percent in 2018. Only 6 percent of companies expect their IT budget to decrease in 2019, compared to 11 percent in 2018. Larger organizations are most likely to see their budgets grow: 56 percent of companies with more than 5,000 employees expect IT budgets to grow, and 43 percent expect them to stay the same in 2019.

When comparing the factors driving budget increases by company size, large enterprises (88 percent) are more likely to boost their budgets due to increased security concerns. In contrast, IT budgets at midsize organizations are more likely to grow due to corporate tax cuts: 35 percent of businesses with 500 to 999 employees reported increased tech budgets for 2019 because of lower taxes.

“Most organizations, particularly small businesses, are increasing IT budgets in 2019 to upgrade aging IT infrastructure and support digital transformation initiatives,” said Peter Tsai, Senior Technology Analyst at Spiceworks. “However, large enterprises, typically with more data and devices to lock down, are primarily increasing budgets due to growing security concerns. With more employees to target, larger organizations recognize the importance of boosting budgets to protect against phishing attacks and avoid potentially crippling malware.”

IT Budget Allocations

Organizations plan to spend 35 percent of their IT budgets on hardware in 2019, up by 4 percentage points year over year. Software and cloud budget allocations remain steady year over year at 26 percent and 21 percent respectively, while budget allocations for managed IT services grew by 1 percentage point to 14 percent of budgets. However, IT budget allocations vary greatly by company size.

Small organizations with less than 100 employees are planning to significantly increase their hardware investments from 31 percent of their total IT budget in 2018 to 42 percent in 2019.

Conversely, large enterprises plan to slightly increase their cloud budgets. Companies with 1,000 to 4,999 employees plan to allocate 22 percent of their IT budgets toward hosted/cloud-based services, up by 2 percentage points year over year, and enterprises with more than 5,000 employees plan to allocate 24 percent of their IT budgets toward cloud services, up by 3 percentage points year over year.

Budget highlights within each category include:

■ In hardware, budget allocations for desktops (18 percent), laptops (17 percent), servers (12 percent), and power and climate (7 percent) hardware top the list.

■ Top software budget allocations include operating systems (12 percent), virtualization (10 percent), productivity (10 percent), and security software (10 percent).

■ Online backup and recovery leads spending in the hosted/cloud-based services category: 15 percent of cloud budgets are allocated towards online backup/recovery, followed by email hosting (11 percent), online productivity (9 percent), and web hosting (9 percent) services.

■ In managed services, 11 percent of budgets will be spent on managed hosting, followed by managed storage/backup (10 percent), managed security (9 percent), and managed business applications (8 percent).

Technology Purchase Decisions

Spiceworks also examined the roles various individuals play in the technology purchase process. The president/CEO is involved the technology purchase decisions in 38 percent of organizations, line of business directors are involved in 32 percent of companies, and finance managers are involved in 28 percent of organizations.

However, across all company sizes, IT decision makers (ITDMs) are nearly twice as likely to be the sole decision maker for most technology categories when compared to business decision makers (BDMs). In small businesses, ITDMs are nearly four times as likely to be the sole decision maker. When involved, BDMs are more likely to either provide final approval or veto the deal after ITDMs have made their vendor and product selection.

Methodology: The survey was conducted by Spiceworks in July 2018 and included 780 respondents from North America and Europe. Respondents are among the millions of business technology buyers in Spiceworks and represent a variety of company sizes including small-to-medium-sized businesses as well as enterprises. Respondents come from a variety of industries including manufacturing, healthcare, non-profits, education, government, and finance.

The Latest

Reliability is no longer proven by uptime alone, according to the The SRE Report 2026 from LogicMonitor. In the AI era, it is experienced through speed, consistency, and user trust, and increasingly judged by business impact. As digital services grow more complex and AI systems move into production, traditional monitoring approaches are struggling to keep pace, increasing the need for AI-first observability that spans applications, infrastructure, and the Internet ...

If AI is the engine of a modern organization, then data engineering is the road system beneath it. You can build the most powerful engine in the world, but without paved roads, traffic signals, and bridges that can support its weight, it will stall. In many enterprises, the engine is ready. The roads are not ...

In the world of digital-first business, there is no tolerance for service outages. Businesses know that outages are the quickest way to lose money and customers. For smaller organizations, unplanned downtime could even force the business to close ... A new study from PagerDuty, The State of AI-First Operations, reveals that companies actively incorporating AI into operations now view operational resilience as a growth driver rather than a cost center. But how are they achieving it? ...

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

Aging IT Infrastructure Drives IT Budget Increases in 2019

Nine out of ten (89 percent) companies expect their IT budgets to grow or remain flat in 2019. Although factors driving budget increases vary significantly by company size, 64 percent of those planning to increase budgets are doing so to upgrade outdated IT infrastructure, according to the 2019 State of IT Budgets report from Spiceworks.

Across all company sizes, 38 percent of organizations expect IT budgets to increase in 2019, and 51 percent expect them to remain flat year over year. Organizations that expect budget increases next year anticipate a 20 percent increase on average, up from 19 percent in 2018. Only 6 percent of companies expect their IT budget to decrease in 2019, compared to 11 percent in 2018. Larger organizations are most likely to see their budgets grow: 56 percent of companies with more than 5,000 employees expect IT budgets to grow, and 43 percent expect them to stay the same in 2019.

When comparing the factors driving budget increases by company size, large enterprises (88 percent) are more likely to boost their budgets due to increased security concerns. In contrast, IT budgets at midsize organizations are more likely to grow due to corporate tax cuts: 35 percent of businesses with 500 to 999 employees reported increased tech budgets for 2019 because of lower taxes.

“Most organizations, particularly small businesses, are increasing IT budgets in 2019 to upgrade aging IT infrastructure and support digital transformation initiatives,” said Peter Tsai, Senior Technology Analyst at Spiceworks. “However, large enterprises, typically with more data and devices to lock down, are primarily increasing budgets due to growing security concerns. With more employees to target, larger organizations recognize the importance of boosting budgets to protect against phishing attacks and avoid potentially crippling malware.”

IT Budget Allocations

Organizations plan to spend 35 percent of their IT budgets on hardware in 2019, up by 4 percentage points year over year. Software and cloud budget allocations remain steady year over year at 26 percent and 21 percent respectively, while budget allocations for managed IT services grew by 1 percentage point to 14 percent of budgets. However, IT budget allocations vary greatly by company size.

Small organizations with less than 100 employees are planning to significantly increase their hardware investments from 31 percent of their total IT budget in 2018 to 42 percent in 2019.

Conversely, large enterprises plan to slightly increase their cloud budgets. Companies with 1,000 to 4,999 employees plan to allocate 22 percent of their IT budgets toward hosted/cloud-based services, up by 2 percentage points year over year, and enterprises with more than 5,000 employees plan to allocate 24 percent of their IT budgets toward cloud services, up by 3 percentage points year over year.

Budget highlights within each category include:

■ In hardware, budget allocations for desktops (18 percent), laptops (17 percent), servers (12 percent), and power and climate (7 percent) hardware top the list.

■ Top software budget allocations include operating systems (12 percent), virtualization (10 percent), productivity (10 percent), and security software (10 percent).

■ Online backup and recovery leads spending in the hosted/cloud-based services category: 15 percent of cloud budgets are allocated towards online backup/recovery, followed by email hosting (11 percent), online productivity (9 percent), and web hosting (9 percent) services.

■ In managed services, 11 percent of budgets will be spent on managed hosting, followed by managed storage/backup (10 percent), managed security (9 percent), and managed business applications (8 percent).

Technology Purchase Decisions

Spiceworks also examined the roles various individuals play in the technology purchase process. The president/CEO is involved the technology purchase decisions in 38 percent of organizations, line of business directors are involved in 32 percent of companies, and finance managers are involved in 28 percent of organizations.

However, across all company sizes, IT decision makers (ITDMs) are nearly twice as likely to be the sole decision maker for most technology categories when compared to business decision makers (BDMs). In small businesses, ITDMs are nearly four times as likely to be the sole decision maker. When involved, BDMs are more likely to either provide final approval or veto the deal after ITDMs have made their vendor and product selection.

Methodology: The survey was conducted by Spiceworks in July 2018 and included 780 respondents from North America and Europe. Respondents are among the millions of business technology buyers in Spiceworks and represent a variety of company sizes including small-to-medium-sized businesses as well as enterprises. Respondents come from a variety of industries including manufacturing, healthcare, non-profits, education, government, and finance.

The Latest

Reliability is no longer proven by uptime alone, according to the The SRE Report 2026 from LogicMonitor. In the AI era, it is experienced through speed, consistency, and user trust, and increasingly judged by business impact. As digital services grow more complex and AI systems move into production, traditional monitoring approaches are struggling to keep pace, increasing the need for AI-first observability that spans applications, infrastructure, and the Internet ...

If AI is the engine of a modern organization, then data engineering is the road system beneath it. You can build the most powerful engine in the world, but without paved roads, traffic signals, and bridges that can support its weight, it will stall. In many enterprises, the engine is ready. The roads are not ...

In the world of digital-first business, there is no tolerance for service outages. Businesses know that outages are the quickest way to lose money and customers. For smaller organizations, unplanned downtime could even force the business to close ... A new study from PagerDuty, The State of AI-First Operations, reveals that companies actively incorporating AI into operations now view operational resilience as a growth driver rather than a cost center. But how are they achieving it? ...

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...