Skip to main content

4 Factors That Can Make or Break an AI Project

Dmitrii Evstiukhin
Provectus

Machine Learning (ML) technologies have evolved at an incredible pace over the past few years, and yet multiple studies suggest that most ML projects fail in the real world. Despite the availability of high-quality technologies, there still exist challenges in using these technologies to create and deliver complete solutions, which can be attributed to several factors.

The main causes of failure can be grouped into four categories:

■ failure to frame the ML problem from a business perspective

■ failure to build a team with the right talent, in the right roles

■ failure to select the right data and ML infrastructure

■ failure to properly manage the AI solution in production

Let's dive into each of these areas in more detail.

1. Failure to frame the ML problem from a business perspective

Firstly, failure to frame the ML problem from a business challenge or opportunity perspective is a common issue. Many companies approach ML with unrealistic expectations, or they are simply following the trend to implement ML, without a clear business need or opportunity. This can lead to wasted resources and disappointment when the project fails to deliver the expected results. To avoid this, it is crucial for the ML problem to be clearly defined, with close collaboration between business leaders and experienced engineers. This ensures that both the business and technical aspects of the problem are considered and that the solution is tailored to the specific needs of the company.

2. Failure to build a team with the right talent, in the right roles

The second factor of AI project failure is the failure to put the right talent in the right roles on the team. When a company has a problem to solve, it is important to get the right talent to work on it. However, this can be a challenging task, as it requires the ability to recognize genuine expertise and skill, which in turn requires the presence of that talent within the organization. To address this, companies should invest in training and development programs to develop talent with the necessary skills within the organization. They should also look for external experts who can bring in specialized knowledge.

3. Failure to select the right data and ML infrastructure

The third cause of failure is not having the right data and ML infrastructure. Even with the right talent, a project can still fail if the appropriate data and infrastructure are not in place. Data is the backbone of any ML project, and without quality data, the model cannot deliver accurate results. Infrastructure is also crucial for the success of the project. This includes hardware and software used for data processing, storage, and model training. Without the right infrastructure, the project will be unable to scale and deliver the expected results.

4. Failure to properly manage the AI solution in production

The final major reason for failure is the failure to properly maintain the AI solution in production. This is the final step of any ML project, and it is where many companies stumble. Once the model has been trained and tested, it needs to be integrated into the current business systems, and work at the scale of the business. This requires talent with yet another expert skillset, and it can be challenging to manage the model in production. This includes monitoring the model, updating it as necessary, and addressing any issues that arise.

Essential Capabilities for ML Infrastructure

These four horsemen of AI project failure are common issues that companies face when implementing ML solutions.

The first two issues are not so much technical as organizational. Clearly, when starting such initiatives, the company's leadership should closely watch for any discrepancies in the organizational structure and processes.

The last two factors that often contribute to an ML project’s failure can be attributed to MLOps and can be resolved by an appropriate implementation.

MLOps, or Machine Learning Operations, is a highly fragmented space, and it can be overwhelming to keep up with all the frameworks and platforms available. But there are certain capabilities that are essential for any real-world ML infrastructure solution. One of the most important is scalability. Organizations and use cases often need to be able to scale up and down, to adjust to the usage patterns of end users. Without scalability, an ML solution may be unable to meet the demands of a production environment.

Another important capability is reproducibility. The platform should be able to successfully reproduce an experiment from a month ago, which requires versioning of everything: data, ML code, pipeline configuration, infrastructure code, experiments, and more. This capability ensures that the results are consistent and can be trusted.

Security and observability are also key capabilities for an ML platform. Properly configured security ensures that the data and models are protected from unauthorized access. In its turn, observability ensures that the platform has full visibility into everything, including data, models, infrastructure, code, and users. This allows for a better understanding and management of the solution.

In conclusion, while ML technologies have advanced rapidly in recent years, the implementation of ML solutions in real-world environments remains a challenge. To overcome challenges, companies should clearly define the ML problem through collaboration between business leaders and experienced engineers. They should invest in training and development programs to build the necessary skills within the organization and seek external experts to bring in specialized knowledge.

Additionally, organizations should focus on building a robust ML infrastructure that includes key capabilities, including scalability, reproducibility, security, and observability.

With a well-defined problem, and the right talent, data, and infrastructure in place, companies can increase their chances of success in implementing ML solutions in the real world.

Dmitrii Evstiukhin is Director of Managed Services at Provectus

The Latest

AI is becoming the operating system of the enterprise. It acts as an invisible coordination layer that understands intent, connects systems, and executes work across complex SaaS environments. Previously, employees had to click through multiple systems — CRM, ERP, support tools, collaboration platforms — to complete a single task. Now, instead of navigating each application manually, they can simply state what they need to accomplish ...

In 2026, the cost of downtime or an outage is no longer just a technical inconvenience; it's a $600 billion wake up call for global businesses. As our digital ecosystems become  more interconnected, each touchpoint introduces new risks and multiplies the consequences when things go wrong. And the data is clear: aggregate downtime costs  for Global 2,000 companies have surged 50% since 2024, reaching a staggering $600 billion ...

Deloitte found that 74% of enterprises expect to deploy agentic AI solutions in the next 24 months. However, the rush to deployment is outpacing foundational work, though. Only 21% of enterprises have fully formed agent governance models in place. The result? AI agents deployed without guidance or governance begin to function as fragmented islands of complexity ...

Cloud spending is no longer viewed as a passthrough IT expense, but as a strategic financial lever that directly impacts innovation capacity, profitability and enterprise resilience, according to the CFO Cloud Cost Optimization Report from Azul ...

As AI moves from generating responses to performing actions, the need for trust increases exponentially. And as organizations enlist AI agents for increasingly sophisticated business processes, trust is going to be the single most important theme for spurring adoption. What can organizations do to build trustworthy AI agents? ...

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

4 Factors That Can Make or Break an AI Project

Dmitrii Evstiukhin
Provectus

Machine Learning (ML) technologies have evolved at an incredible pace over the past few years, and yet multiple studies suggest that most ML projects fail in the real world. Despite the availability of high-quality technologies, there still exist challenges in using these technologies to create and deliver complete solutions, which can be attributed to several factors.

The main causes of failure can be grouped into four categories:

■ failure to frame the ML problem from a business perspective

■ failure to build a team with the right talent, in the right roles

■ failure to select the right data and ML infrastructure

■ failure to properly manage the AI solution in production

Let's dive into each of these areas in more detail.

1. Failure to frame the ML problem from a business perspective

Firstly, failure to frame the ML problem from a business challenge or opportunity perspective is a common issue. Many companies approach ML with unrealistic expectations, or they are simply following the trend to implement ML, without a clear business need or opportunity. This can lead to wasted resources and disappointment when the project fails to deliver the expected results. To avoid this, it is crucial for the ML problem to be clearly defined, with close collaboration between business leaders and experienced engineers. This ensures that both the business and technical aspects of the problem are considered and that the solution is tailored to the specific needs of the company.

2. Failure to build a team with the right talent, in the right roles

The second factor of AI project failure is the failure to put the right talent in the right roles on the team. When a company has a problem to solve, it is important to get the right talent to work on it. However, this can be a challenging task, as it requires the ability to recognize genuine expertise and skill, which in turn requires the presence of that talent within the organization. To address this, companies should invest in training and development programs to develop talent with the necessary skills within the organization. They should also look for external experts who can bring in specialized knowledge.

3. Failure to select the right data and ML infrastructure

The third cause of failure is not having the right data and ML infrastructure. Even with the right talent, a project can still fail if the appropriate data and infrastructure are not in place. Data is the backbone of any ML project, and without quality data, the model cannot deliver accurate results. Infrastructure is also crucial for the success of the project. This includes hardware and software used for data processing, storage, and model training. Without the right infrastructure, the project will be unable to scale and deliver the expected results.

4. Failure to properly manage the AI solution in production

The final major reason for failure is the failure to properly maintain the AI solution in production. This is the final step of any ML project, and it is where many companies stumble. Once the model has been trained and tested, it needs to be integrated into the current business systems, and work at the scale of the business. This requires talent with yet another expert skillset, and it can be challenging to manage the model in production. This includes monitoring the model, updating it as necessary, and addressing any issues that arise.

Essential Capabilities for ML Infrastructure

These four horsemen of AI project failure are common issues that companies face when implementing ML solutions.

The first two issues are not so much technical as organizational. Clearly, when starting such initiatives, the company's leadership should closely watch for any discrepancies in the organizational structure and processes.

The last two factors that often contribute to an ML project’s failure can be attributed to MLOps and can be resolved by an appropriate implementation.

MLOps, or Machine Learning Operations, is a highly fragmented space, and it can be overwhelming to keep up with all the frameworks and platforms available. But there are certain capabilities that are essential for any real-world ML infrastructure solution. One of the most important is scalability. Organizations and use cases often need to be able to scale up and down, to adjust to the usage patterns of end users. Without scalability, an ML solution may be unable to meet the demands of a production environment.

Another important capability is reproducibility. The platform should be able to successfully reproduce an experiment from a month ago, which requires versioning of everything: data, ML code, pipeline configuration, infrastructure code, experiments, and more. This capability ensures that the results are consistent and can be trusted.

Security and observability are also key capabilities for an ML platform. Properly configured security ensures that the data and models are protected from unauthorized access. In its turn, observability ensures that the platform has full visibility into everything, including data, models, infrastructure, code, and users. This allows for a better understanding and management of the solution.

In conclusion, while ML technologies have advanced rapidly in recent years, the implementation of ML solutions in real-world environments remains a challenge. To overcome challenges, companies should clearly define the ML problem through collaboration between business leaders and experienced engineers. They should invest in training and development programs to build the necessary skills within the organization and seek external experts to bring in specialized knowledge.

Additionally, organizations should focus on building a robust ML infrastructure that includes key capabilities, including scalability, reproducibility, security, and observability.

With a well-defined problem, and the right talent, data, and infrastructure in place, companies can increase their chances of success in implementing ML solutions in the real world.

Dmitrii Evstiukhin is Director of Managed Services at Provectus

The Latest

AI is becoming the operating system of the enterprise. It acts as an invisible coordination layer that understands intent, connects systems, and executes work across complex SaaS environments. Previously, employees had to click through multiple systems — CRM, ERP, support tools, collaboration platforms — to complete a single task. Now, instead of navigating each application manually, they can simply state what they need to accomplish ...

In 2026, the cost of downtime or an outage is no longer just a technical inconvenience; it's a $600 billion wake up call for global businesses. As our digital ecosystems become  more interconnected, each touchpoint introduces new risks and multiplies the consequences when things go wrong. And the data is clear: aggregate downtime costs  for Global 2,000 companies have surged 50% since 2024, reaching a staggering $600 billion ...

Deloitte found that 74% of enterprises expect to deploy agentic AI solutions in the next 24 months. However, the rush to deployment is outpacing foundational work, though. Only 21% of enterprises have fully formed agent governance models in place. The result? AI agents deployed without guidance or governance begin to function as fragmented islands of complexity ...

Cloud spending is no longer viewed as a passthrough IT expense, but as a strategic financial lever that directly impacts innovation capacity, profitability and enterprise resilience, according to the CFO Cloud Cost Optimization Report from Azul ...

As AI moves from generating responses to performing actions, the need for trust increases exponentially. And as organizations enlist AI agents for increasingly sophisticated business processes, trust is going to be the single most important theme for spurring adoption. What can organizations do to build trustworthy AI agents? ...

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...