AI Assets and Intellectual Property Ownership
May 13, 2019

Ramesh Mahalingam
Vizru

Share this

A subtle, deliberate shift has occurred within the software industry which, at present, only the most innovative organizations have seized upon for competitive advantage. Although primarily driven by Artificial Intelligence (AI), this transformation strikes at the core of the most pervasive IT resources including cloud computing and predictive analytics.

Initially, software was used to solve internal problems via an ownership model that eventually yielded to the contemporary SaaS paradigm in which applications are effectively rented. However, the next generation of application building is based on nuanced, individualized customer experiences in which ownership of the intellectual property of software is a critical determinant for optimizing revenues and customer relationships.

Intellectual property ownership is not possible with contemporary SaaS offerings. What's required is a new approach in which organizations decouple their stacks from AI vendors', commercialize them for bespoke customer experiences, and retain full rights to the intellectual property of the customized, artisan AI models delivering these advantages. The monetary benefits of owning the AI assets organizations use, and their intellectual property, will ensure this next evolution of app building is as ubiquitous as the current one is.

Customized Artisan Solutions and AI Models

AI is the forerunner in this movement because of the degree of individualization it offers via its micro-segmentation capacity. Artificial Intelligence systems can personalize models for particular demographics including age, geographic location, user behavior and an assortment of other pertinent categories. For example, in finance, a bot can know the best way to communicate with a person according to his or her profile and customer segmentation.

Because all of these various factors are packaged within AI models, there's a pivotal distinction in owning their intellectual property, particularly when it comes to commercializing it by offering services to consumers. However, when those models are simply rented from AI vendors via SaaS or other options, organizations are restricted in their ability to customize solutions by including the vendor in the processes. The reality is that simply by using the vendor's resources to build or deploy models, organizations are compromising their claims to the intellectual property of services based on them.

Commercializing Bespoke AI

Intellectual property is a key factor for commercializing customized AI models that tailor services to individual consumers. In insurance, for example, an organization may want to create additional revenue streams by offering a service to senior customers to store their wills, trusts, and other such documents in one place. In theory, such a company should have the autonomy to sell this capability as a service. If its applications are running in current cloud offerings like Salesforce, however, this conglomerate owns the intellectual property for this idea because it's facilitating the infrastructure.

Modern organizations require total ownership of their AI resources, whether that involves owning models, bots, or the intellectual property driving them. Without ownership of that intellectual property, organizations are considerably slowed — if not stuck in a state of paralysis — when it comes to extending new, personalized services to their customers that AI substantially helps facilitate. But if they owned the whole stack themselves, they could reap the full monetary benefits of commercializing AI without any restrictions of building atop an application provider's stack.

Decoupling Services from AI Stacks

The ability to decouple AI from a vendor's stack to commercialize various services at will is a crucial prerequisite for exploiting the boons of intellectual property ownership of AI assets. The majority of contemporary SaaS providers don't offer this degree of autonomy. Nonetheless, modern AI platforms give organizations the license to decouple everything needed to independently deploy AI services where they're most beneficial, giving them sole claim to the intellectual property.

Typically comprised of a user interface, bots specializing in various forms of AI, and respective layers for workflows and integration, these mechanisms are optimal for rapid deployments in a multiplicity of environments whether on-premises, in hybrid or multi-clouds, or at the edge. Such solutions are virtual software factories in which organizations not only own their intellectual property, but can sell AI services to customers with complete autonomy.

The Valuation of Intellectual Property

Ultimately, this emergent paradigm for deploying software will usurp the modern one for customer-facing applications because of the financial benefits of intellectual property's valuation. Intellectual property rights enable organizations to deliver hyper-personalized customer interactions, own the artisan AI models driving them, and profit exponentially on their net valuation.

In insurance, if a company can demonstrate its customers on-board through a technology platform it owns, its valuation increases 10 times because it's categorized differently on its balance sheet than if it used another's platform. Insurance revenues of $20 million become $200 million. That difference is the final boon of intellectual property ownership in the AI services space, which also includes individualization and celeritous commercialization to satisfy customers the way other technologies can't.

Ramesh Mahalingam is CEO of Vizru
Share this

The Latest

March 31, 2020

Organizations face major infrastructure and security challenges in supporting multi-cloud and edge deployments, according to new global survey conducted by Propeller Insights for Volterra ...

March 30, 2020

Developers spend roughly 17.3 hours each week debugging, refactoring and modifying bad code — valuable time that could be spent writing more code, shipping better products and innovating. The bottom line? Nearly $300B (US) in lost developer productivity every year ...

March 26, 2020

While remote work policies have been gaining steam for the better part of the past decade across the enterprise space — driven in large part by more agile and scalable, cloud-delivered business solutions — recent events have pushed adoption into overdrive ...

March 25, 2020

Time-critical, unplanned work caused by IT disruptions continues to plague enterprises around the world, leading to lost revenue, significant employee morale problems and missed opportunities to innovate, according to the State of Unplanned Work Report 2020, conducted by Dimensional Research for PagerDuty ...

March 24, 2020

In today's iterative world, development teams care a lot more about how apps are running. There's a demand for fixing actionable items. Developers want to know exactly what's broken, what to fix right now, and what can wait. They want to know, "Do we build or fix?" This trade-off between building new features versus fixing bugs is one of the key factors behind the adoption of Application Stability management tools ...

March 23, 2020

With the rise of mobile apps and iterative development releases, Application Stability has answered the widespread need to monitor applications in a new way, shifting the focus from servers and networks to the customer experience. The emergence of Application Stability has caused some consternation for diehard APM fans. However, these two solutions embody very distinct monitoring focuses, which leads me to believe there's room for both tools, as well as different teams for both ...

March 19, 2020

The 2019 State of E-Commerce Infrastructure Report, from Webscale, analyzes findings from a comprehensive survey of more than 450 ecommerce professionals regarding how their online stores performed during the 2019 holiday season. Some key insights from the report include ...

March 18, 2020

Robinhood is a unicorn startup that has been disrupting the way by which many millennials have been investing and managing their money for the past few years. For Robinhood, the burden of proof was to show that they can provide an infrastructure that is as scalable, reliable and secure as that of major banks who have been developing their trading infrastructure for the last quarter-century. That promise fell flat last week, when the market volatility brought about a set of edge cases that brought Robinhood's trading app to its knees ...

March 17, 2020

Application backend monitoring is the key to acquiring visibility across the enterprise's application stack, from the application layer and underlying infrastructure to third-party API services, web servers and databases, be they on-premises, in a public or private cloud, or in a hybrid model. By tracking and reporting performance in real time, IT teams can ensure applications perform at peak efficiency — and guarantee a seamless customer experience. How can IT operations teams improve application backend monitoring? By embracing artificial intelligence for operations — AIOps ...

March 16, 2020

In 2020, DevOps teams will face heightened expectations for higher speed and frequency of code delivery, which means their IT environments will become even more modular, ephemeral and dynamic — and significantly more complicated to monitor. As a result, AIOps will further cement its position as the most effective technology that DevOps teams can use to see and control what's going on with their applications and their underlying infrastructure, so that they can prevent outages. Here I outline five key trends to watch related to how AIOps will impact DevOps in 2020 and beyond ...