Alert Thresholds: Aggravating Mess or Indispensable Friends?
September 18, 2013
Praveen Manohar
Share this

Setting up a network or application monitoring system involves creating alerts for critical parameters that need attention. Alerts are an integral part of monitoring and they should be easily understandable, provide actionable knowledge and should not make excessive noise. For an alert to be valuable to the user and meet those criteria, the right set of thresholds is essential. That really is the question then: How do you find the right threshold values for your alerts?

To determine and set the right threshold value, a deep level of understanding about the application, the server that hosts the application and the environment where the servers reside is required. Also needed is an application monitoring system that simplifies the process of isolating abnormal performance patterns in your environment. In the best case, you also have tools to assist with automatic threshold determination based on your real-world environment.

The Challenge of Dynamic Environments

When an application behaves as expected or if there is no significant variation in its day-to-day behavior, setting an alert threshold is a cakewalk. You know what is normal vs. what is unexpected. What if the application does not have a fixed baseline behavior? When it comes to applications with dynamic behavior patterns, even the Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) may find it challenging to set ideal thresholds, or have the patience to maintain and recalibrate them over time.

Let us take a look at some examples of where alerting can be difficult because finding the right threshold is challenging. Take Page Files for example. Their usage depends on workload, kernel and Operating System parameters and thus the usage differs from server to server.

Other examples are LDAP, Exchange, Lotus, etc., all of whose behavior depends on organization size, deployment platform and usage patterns. And then there is SQL - SQL server behavior changes based on number of applications connected to the DB.

The scenarios we saw now contribute to some major problems:

- False alerts flood your inbox leading you to a “Crying Wolf” situation. This occurs because you used a very low threshold and your mail box was flooded with alarms leaving you with no way to identify truly important alerts.

- You use a very high threshold value and there are almost no alerts. In such cases the first alert you may receive will be a critical level ticket raised by a user about application performance.

- The right threshold varies from server to server and also over time. This means you need to constantly monitor your servers and adapt to changing usage patterns. This could require you to invest time and resources on recalculating numerous threshold values, way more often than you'd like. That is easier said than done.

Since thresholds can change over time and from server to server, the investment of time and resources that goes into pulling up multiple reports, recalculating thresholds, and that too for multiple servers with every change can be huge. This is why it is imperative that you use a monitoring tool with the ability to automatically set your thresholds for alerts.

Your monitoring tools should be able to make use of the data it's already collecting for a monitored parameter and do the math to suggest the right threshold for a parameter. Such a tool can save time because you don't have to constantly revisit hundreds or thousands of metrics for every change in the network or services environment, pull reports and recalculate. Math should be reserved for more enjoyable leisure activities like calculating subnets. With automation you won’t have to find mean values and standard deviations to then determine what you think is the right threshold. And all this leads to reducing false alerts and giving you an opportunity to quickly cut thought the clutter and easily identify critical issues before users call the helpdesk.

Because application uptime is critical, automatic threshold capability will leave you with enough time to deal with issues that really need your attention. Alert tuning shouldn't be one more thing on your backlog list, they can be dependable partners who may bring you bad news, but in the best possible way. Who every thought you could enjoy alerts?

ABOUT Praveen Manohar

Praveen Manohar is a Head Geek at SolarWinds, a global IT management software provider based in Austin, Texas. He has 7 years of IT industry experience in roles such as Support Engineer, Product Trainer and Technical Consultant, and his expertise lies in technologies including NetFlow, Flexible NetFlow, Cisco NBAR, Cisco IPSLA, WMI and SNMP. Manohar gives strategic guidance for end users on applications, networks and performance monitoring tools.

Related Links:

www.solarwinds.com

Share this

The Latest

April 23, 2024

While most companies are now deploying cloud-based technologies, the 2024 Secure Cloud Networking Field Report from Aviatrix found that there is a silent struggle to maximize value from those investments. Many of the challenges organizations have faced over the past several years have evolved, but continue today ...

April 22, 2024

In our latest research, Cisco's The App Attention Index 2023: Beware the Application Generation, 62% of consumers report their expectations for digital experiences are far higher than they were two years ago, and 64% state they are less forgiving of poor digital services than they were just 12 months ago ...

April 19, 2024

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 5, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the network source of truth ...

April 18, 2024

A vast majority (89%) of organizations have rapidly expanded their technology in the past few years and three quarters (76%) say it's brought with it increased "chaos" that they have to manage, according to Situation Report 2024: Managing Technology Chaos from Software AG ...

April 17, 2024

In 2024 the number one challenge facing IT teams is a lack of skilled workers, and many are turning to automation as an answer, according to IT Trends: 2024 Industry Report ...

April 16, 2024

Organizations are continuing to embrace multicloud environments and cloud-native architectures to enable rapid transformation and deliver secure innovation. However, despite the speed, scale, and agility enabled by these modern cloud ecosystems, organizations are struggling to manage the explosion of data they create, according to The state of observability 2024: Overcoming complexity through AI-driven analytics and automation strategies, a report from Dynatrace ...

April 15, 2024

Organizations recognize the value of observability, but only 10% of them are actually practicing full observability of their applications and infrastructure. This is among the key findings from the recently completed Logz.io 2024 Observability Pulse Survey and Report ...

April 11, 2024

Businesses must adopt a comprehensive Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) strategy, says Enterprise Management Associates (EMA), a leading IT analyst research firm. This strategy is crucial to bridge the significant observability gap within today's complex IT infrastructures. The recommendation is particularly timely, given that 99% of enterprises are expanding their use of the Internet as a primary connectivity conduit while facing challenges due to the inefficiency of multiple, disjointed monitoring tools, according to Modern Enterprises Must Boost Observability with Internet Performance Monitoring, a new report from EMA and Catchpoint ...

April 10, 2024

Choosing the right approach is critical with cloud monitoring in hybrid environments. Otherwise, you may drive up costs with features you don’t need and risk diminishing the visibility of your on-premises IT ...

April 09, 2024

Consumers ranked the marketing strategies and missteps that most significantly impact brand trust, which 73% say is their biggest motivator to share first-party data, according to The Rules of the Marketing Game, a 2023 report from Pantheon ...